Probabilistic assessment of seismic acceleration demands of ductile light NSCs in moderately ductile RC frame buildings

IF 6.4 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Majid Mehrjoo, Rola Assi
{"title":"Probabilistic assessment of seismic acceleration demands of ductile light NSCs in moderately ductile RC frame buildings","authors":"Majid Mehrjoo,&nbsp;Rola Assi","doi":"10.1016/j.engstruct.2025.120347","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study investigates how the seismic demands of non-structural components (NSCs) are influenced by both their attachment ductility and the nonlinear behavior of supporting structures. The research focuses on acceleration demands at various building elevations and evaluates component damage states according to Hazus guidelines. Incremental dynamic analysis (IDA) was applied to evaluate both linear and nonlinear structural responses of four archetype reinforced concrete moment-resisting frame buildings. Ground motions, consisting of historical and synthetic records, were scaled to match Montreal’s uniform hazard spectrum for Site Class 'C' with a 2 % probability of exceedance per 50 years. NSC responses were assessed using an uncoupled analysis approach, implemented through iterative Newmark integration. Key findings demonstrate that increasing the ductility of NSC attachments reduces their acceleration demands by up to 140 % in elastic structures. When accounting for structural nonlinearity, acceleration demands decrease by 110 %, highlighting the conservative nature of elastic analysis assumptions commonly used in current design practices. These reductions are most pronounced for components with periods corresponding to the structure's fundamental mode, with the effect diminishing for higher modes. The research provides practical design implications by quantifying the relationship between attachment ductility, structural behavior, and component damage thresholds. The results indicate that a moderately ductile (μ≈1.5) NSC attachment provides optimal performance benefits while minimizing the risk of NSC damage, offering valuable insights for the performance-based design of NSCs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11763,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Structures","volume":"335 ","pages":"Article 120347"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Structures","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0141029625007382","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigates how the seismic demands of non-structural components (NSCs) are influenced by both their attachment ductility and the nonlinear behavior of supporting structures. The research focuses on acceleration demands at various building elevations and evaluates component damage states according to Hazus guidelines. Incremental dynamic analysis (IDA) was applied to evaluate both linear and nonlinear structural responses of four archetype reinforced concrete moment-resisting frame buildings. Ground motions, consisting of historical and synthetic records, were scaled to match Montreal’s uniform hazard spectrum for Site Class 'C' with a 2 % probability of exceedance per 50 years. NSC responses were assessed using an uncoupled analysis approach, implemented through iterative Newmark integration. Key findings demonstrate that increasing the ductility of NSC attachments reduces their acceleration demands by up to 140 % in elastic structures. When accounting for structural nonlinearity, acceleration demands decrease by 110 %, highlighting the conservative nature of elastic analysis assumptions commonly used in current design practices. These reductions are most pronounced for components with periods corresponding to the structure's fundamental mode, with the effect diminishing for higher modes. The research provides practical design implications by quantifying the relationship between attachment ductility, structural behavior, and component damage thresholds. The results indicate that a moderately ductile (μ≈1.5) NSC attachment provides optimal performance benefits while minimizing the risk of NSC damage, offering valuable insights for the performance-based design of NSCs.
中等延性钢筋混凝土框架建筑中延性轻型NSCs地震加速度需求的概率评估
本文研究了非结构构件(NSCs)的附加延性和支承结构的非线性行为对其抗震要求的影响。研究重点是不同建筑高度下的加速度需求,并根据Hazus准则评估构件的损伤状态。采用增量动力分析(IDA)方法对四栋典型钢筋混凝土抗弯矩框架结构的线性和非线性结构响应进行了分析。由历史和合成记录组成的地面运动被按比例调整,以符合蒙特利尔的“C”级场地统一危险谱,每50年超过2 %的概率。NSC响应采用非耦合分析方法进行评估,通过迭代Newmark集成实现。主要研究结果表明,增加NSC附件的延展性可以减少弹性结构中高达140% %的加速度需求。当考虑结构非线性时,加速度要求减少110% %,突出了当前设计实践中常用的弹性分析假设的保守性。对于周期与结构基本模态相对应的组件,这种减少最为明显,而对于较高模态的组件,这种影响逐渐减弱。该研究通过量化附着物延展性、结构行为和构件损伤阈值之间的关系,为实际设计提供了参考。结果表明,中等延展性(μ≈1.5)的NSC附件可提供最佳的性能优势,同时将NSC损伤的风险降至最低,为基于性能的NSC设计提供了有价值的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Engineering Structures
Engineering Structures 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
14.50%
发文量
1385
审稿时长
67 days
期刊介绍: Engineering Structures provides a forum for a broad blend of scientific and technical papers to reflect the evolving needs of the structural engineering and structural mechanics communities. Particularly welcome are contributions dealing with applications of structural engineering and mechanics principles in all areas of technology. The journal aspires to a broad and integrated coverage of the effects of dynamic loadings and of the modelling techniques whereby the structural response to these loadings may be computed. The scope of Engineering Structures encompasses, but is not restricted to, the following areas: infrastructure engineering; earthquake engineering; structure-fluid-soil interaction; wind engineering; fire engineering; blast engineering; structural reliability/stability; life assessment/integrity; structural health monitoring; multi-hazard engineering; structural dynamics; optimization; expert systems; experimental modelling; performance-based design; multiscale analysis; value engineering. Topics of interest include: tall buildings; innovative structures; environmentally responsive structures; bridges; stadiums; commercial and public buildings; transmission towers; television and telecommunication masts; foldable structures; cooling towers; plates and shells; suspension structures; protective structures; smart structures; nuclear reactors; dams; pressure vessels; pipelines; tunnels. Engineering Structures also publishes review articles, short communications and discussions, book reviews, and a diary on international events related to any aspect of structural engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信