André Tavares , Emilio Di Lorenzo , Bram Cornelis , Simone Manzato , Bart Peeters , Wim Desmet , Konstantinos Gryllias
{"title":"Automated experimental modal analysis with density-based clustering: A benchmark validation through jury testing","authors":"André Tavares , Emilio Di Lorenzo , Bram Cornelis , Simone Manzato , Bart Peeters , Wim Desmet , Konstantinos Gryllias","doi":"10.1016/j.ymssp.2025.112714","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Modal analysis has evolved into a major technology for the study of structural dynamics in the past several decades. Through it, complex structural dynamics phenomena can be represented in terms of structural resonance characteristics, i.e., the modal parameters: natural frequencies, damping ratios, and mode shapes. These analyses are often performed by analysts who manually select the system’s poles (which represent the modal parameters), from so-called stabilization diagrams, which is a time-consuming and error-prone process. Furthermore, the difficulty of interpreting stabilization diagrams increases with the complexity of the dataset, sometimes requiring an expert with a high level of domain knowledge to interpret it. Therefore, the automation of pole selection in modal analysis is important to accurately process complex datasets without user-dependent interaction and with repeatability. In this work, three Automated Modal Analysis (AMA) methodologies are proposed using three Machine Learning (ML) density-based clustering techniques, combined with domain knowledge of modal parameter selection. The methodologies are benchmarked against the manual selection by multiple engineers with different levels of modal analysis expertise. The benchmark study consists of the analysis of eight industrial datasets, and the further comparison to another industrially used AMA method applied to the same datasets. A comparative overview of the results is described in this paper, along with the advantages of the proposed AMA methodologies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51124,"journal":{"name":"Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing","volume":"232 ","pages":"Article 112714"},"PeriodicalIF":8.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0888327025004157","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Modal analysis has evolved into a major technology for the study of structural dynamics in the past several decades. Through it, complex structural dynamics phenomena can be represented in terms of structural resonance characteristics, i.e., the modal parameters: natural frequencies, damping ratios, and mode shapes. These analyses are often performed by analysts who manually select the system’s poles (which represent the modal parameters), from so-called stabilization diagrams, which is a time-consuming and error-prone process. Furthermore, the difficulty of interpreting stabilization diagrams increases with the complexity of the dataset, sometimes requiring an expert with a high level of domain knowledge to interpret it. Therefore, the automation of pole selection in modal analysis is important to accurately process complex datasets without user-dependent interaction and with repeatability. In this work, three Automated Modal Analysis (AMA) methodologies are proposed using three Machine Learning (ML) density-based clustering techniques, combined with domain knowledge of modal parameter selection. The methodologies are benchmarked against the manual selection by multiple engineers with different levels of modal analysis expertise. The benchmark study consists of the analysis of eight industrial datasets, and the further comparison to another industrially used AMA method applied to the same datasets. A comparative overview of the results is described in this paper, along with the advantages of the proposed AMA methodologies.
期刊介绍:
Journal Name: Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing (MSSP)
Interdisciplinary Focus:
Mechanical, Aerospace, and Civil Engineering
Purpose:Reporting scientific advancements of the highest quality
Arising from new techniques in sensing, instrumentation, signal processing, modelling, and control of dynamic systems