Filipe Matos Pereira Lima, Mélodie Laniel, Hambaliou Baldé, Robert Gordon and Andrew VanderZaag*,
{"title":"Sulfate Additives Cut Methane Emissions More Effectively at Lower Liquid Manure Storage Temperatures","authors":"Filipe Matos Pereira Lima, Mélodie Laniel, Hambaliou Baldé, Robert Gordon and Andrew VanderZaag*, ","doi":"10.1021/acsagscitech.4c0065910.1021/acsagscitech.4c00659","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Reducing methane (CH<sub>4</sub>) emissions from dairy farms is a key objective in limiting total greenhouse gas emissions from the livestock industry. Reducing CH<sub>4</sub> emissions from manure storage using additives may provide an achievable near-term contribution to this long-term goal in alignment with the International Dairy Federation’s initiative on pathways to net zero. Sulfate-based H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub> and the sulfate-containing nonacid CaSO<sub>4</sub> have effectively suppressed methane emissions in lab studies at a single temperature. The present study analyzes the effect of temperature on the efficacy of these two additives, bridging the gap between common laboratory conditions and average on-farm temperature. We found superior cumulative suppression, higher peak suppression, and longer duration of high-end suppression at lower temperatures when comparing controls to additive experiments at 24, 21, and 18 °C over 120 days. Peak mitigation increased as temperature decreased, culminating at 82.9% and 57.6% for H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub> and CaSO<sub>4</sub>, respectively, at 18 °C. Additives remained effective for longer at lower temperatures, with H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub> maintaining ≥70% peak mitigation (PM) for 102 days at 18 °C, but only 48 days at 24 °C; CaSO<sub>4</sub> retained ≥70% PM for 87 days at 18 °C, but only 38 days at 24 °C. PM for each additive occurs at similar thermal times, despite appearing different at conventional times. Our analysis creates a link between the efficacy of CH<sub>4</sub> mitigation and local temperatures, which can be related to cumulative heat (thermal time/degree-days) to establish site-specific guidance for CH<sub>4</sub> mitigation protocols.</p>","PeriodicalId":93846,"journal":{"name":"ACS agricultural science & technology","volume":"5 4","pages":"552–558 552–558"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/epdf/10.1021/acsagscitech.4c00659","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS agricultural science & technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsagscitech.4c00659","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Reducing methane (CH4) emissions from dairy farms is a key objective in limiting total greenhouse gas emissions from the livestock industry. Reducing CH4 emissions from manure storage using additives may provide an achievable near-term contribution to this long-term goal in alignment with the International Dairy Federation’s initiative on pathways to net zero. Sulfate-based H2SO4 and the sulfate-containing nonacid CaSO4 have effectively suppressed methane emissions in lab studies at a single temperature. The present study analyzes the effect of temperature on the efficacy of these two additives, bridging the gap between common laboratory conditions and average on-farm temperature. We found superior cumulative suppression, higher peak suppression, and longer duration of high-end suppression at lower temperatures when comparing controls to additive experiments at 24, 21, and 18 °C over 120 days. Peak mitigation increased as temperature decreased, culminating at 82.9% and 57.6% for H2SO4 and CaSO4, respectively, at 18 °C. Additives remained effective for longer at lower temperatures, with H2SO4 maintaining ≥70% peak mitigation (PM) for 102 days at 18 °C, but only 48 days at 24 °C; CaSO4 retained ≥70% PM for 87 days at 18 °C, but only 38 days at 24 °C. PM for each additive occurs at similar thermal times, despite appearing different at conventional times. Our analysis creates a link between the efficacy of CH4 mitigation and local temperatures, which can be related to cumulative heat (thermal time/degree-days) to establish site-specific guidance for CH4 mitigation protocols.