Association Between Neuromuscular Blockade and Its Reversal With Postoperative Delirium in Older Patients: A Hospital Registry Study.

Elena Ahrens,Luca J Wachtendorf,Denys Shay,Theresa Tenge,Béla-Simon Paschold,Maíra I Rudolph,Simone Redaelli,Lars Kaiser,Aiman Suleiman,Haobo Ma,Philipp J Fassbender,Maximilian S Schaefer
{"title":"Association Between Neuromuscular Blockade and Its Reversal With Postoperative Delirium in Older Patients: A Hospital Registry Study.","authors":"Elena Ahrens,Luca J Wachtendorf,Denys Shay,Theresa Tenge,Béla-Simon Paschold,Maíra I Rudolph,Simone Redaelli,Lars Kaiser,Aiman Suleiman,Haobo Ma,Philipp J Fassbender,Maximilian S Schaefer","doi":"10.1213/ane.0000000000007489","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nNondepolarizing neuromuscular blocking agents (ND-NMBAs) are dose-dependently associated with residual paralysis, delayed recovery, and prolonged hospitalization, factors that can predispose patients to postoperative delirium. We hypothesized that neuromuscular blockade is associated with a higher risk of delirium after surgery, and that this can be mitigated by administration of reversal agents.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nIn total, 53,772 adult hospitalized patients aged ≥60 years who underwent general anesthesia for noncardiac, nonneurosurgical, nontransplant procedures between 2008 and 2024 at a tertiary health care network in Massachusetts, were included. The exposure was the intraoperative administration of ND-NMBAs. The primary outcome was 7-day delirium, identified from nursing and physician charts using a keyword-based search strategy paired with manual chart review, Confusion Assessment Method assessments, and International Classification of Diseases (9th/10th Revision, Clinical Modification) diagnostic codes.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nIn total, 43,723 (81.3%) patients received neuromuscular blockade. Approximately 2259 (4.2%) patients developed delirium, 1884 (4.3%) with, and 375 (3.7%) without ND-NMBA administration. In adjusted analyses, administration of ND-NMBAs was dose-dependently associated with a higher risk of postoperative delirium (adjusted odds ratio [ORadj] 1.15; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01-1.31; P = .038 and 1.09; 95% CI, 1.06-1.12; P < .001 per each unit increase in the effective dose required to achieve a 95% twitch reduction). 38,143 (87.2%) patients who received ND-NMBAs also received a reversal agent, which was associated with a lower risk of impaired neuromuscular recovery (preextubation train-of-four ratio <95; ORadj 0.60; 95% CI, 0.49-0.74; P < .001) and delirium (ORadj 0.73; 95% CI, 0.64-0.83; P < .001), compared to no reversal. The adverse effect of ND-NMBAs on delirium risk was eliminated by reversal agent administration (ORadj 1.07; 95% CI, 0.94-1.23; P = .30 with and ORadj 1.52; 95% CI, 1.28-1.79; P < .001 without reversal agent administration). There was no association between administration of neostigmine, compared to sugammadex, with postoperative delirium (ORadj 0.91; 95% CI, 0.73-1.12; P = .36).\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nNeuromuscular blockade during general anesthesia is dose-dependently associated with a higher risk of postoperative delirium. The administration of reversal agents mitigates this risk and might help reduce the occurrence of delirium after surgery.","PeriodicalId":7799,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesia & Analgesia","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesia & Analgesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0000000000007489","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND Nondepolarizing neuromuscular blocking agents (ND-NMBAs) are dose-dependently associated with residual paralysis, delayed recovery, and prolonged hospitalization, factors that can predispose patients to postoperative delirium. We hypothesized that neuromuscular blockade is associated with a higher risk of delirium after surgery, and that this can be mitigated by administration of reversal agents. METHODS In total, 53,772 adult hospitalized patients aged ≥60 years who underwent general anesthesia for noncardiac, nonneurosurgical, nontransplant procedures between 2008 and 2024 at a tertiary health care network in Massachusetts, were included. The exposure was the intraoperative administration of ND-NMBAs. The primary outcome was 7-day delirium, identified from nursing and physician charts using a keyword-based search strategy paired with manual chart review, Confusion Assessment Method assessments, and International Classification of Diseases (9th/10th Revision, Clinical Modification) diagnostic codes. RESULTS In total, 43,723 (81.3%) patients received neuromuscular blockade. Approximately 2259 (4.2%) patients developed delirium, 1884 (4.3%) with, and 375 (3.7%) without ND-NMBA administration. In adjusted analyses, administration of ND-NMBAs was dose-dependently associated with a higher risk of postoperative delirium (adjusted odds ratio [ORadj] 1.15; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01-1.31; P = .038 and 1.09; 95% CI, 1.06-1.12; P < .001 per each unit increase in the effective dose required to achieve a 95% twitch reduction). 38,143 (87.2%) patients who received ND-NMBAs also received a reversal agent, which was associated with a lower risk of impaired neuromuscular recovery (preextubation train-of-four ratio <95; ORadj 0.60; 95% CI, 0.49-0.74; P < .001) and delirium (ORadj 0.73; 95% CI, 0.64-0.83; P < .001), compared to no reversal. The adverse effect of ND-NMBAs on delirium risk was eliminated by reversal agent administration (ORadj 1.07; 95% CI, 0.94-1.23; P = .30 with and ORadj 1.52; 95% CI, 1.28-1.79; P < .001 without reversal agent administration). There was no association between administration of neostigmine, compared to sugammadex, with postoperative delirium (ORadj 0.91; 95% CI, 0.73-1.12; P = .36). CONCLUSIONS Neuromuscular blockade during general anesthesia is dose-dependently associated with a higher risk of postoperative delirium. The administration of reversal agents mitigates this risk and might help reduce the occurrence of delirium after surgery.
神经肌肉阻断及其逆转与老年患者术后谵妄的关系:一项医院登记研究。
背景非去极化神经肌肉阻滞剂(ND-NMBA)与残余麻痹、恢复延迟和住院时间延长呈剂量依赖关系,这些因素可能导致患者术后谵妄。我们假设神经肌肉阻滞与较高的术后谵妄风险相关,而这一风险可以通过使用逆转剂得到缓解。方法共纳入了马萨诸塞州一家三级医疗保健网络在 2008 年至 2024 年期间因非心脏、非神经外科、非器官移植手术而接受全身麻醉的 53772 名年龄≥60 岁的成年住院患者。暴露是术中施用 ND-NMBAs。主要研究结果为 7 天谵妄,采用基于关键词的搜索策略,结合人工病历审查、意识混乱评估方法评估和《国际疾病分类》(第 9/10 版,临床修订版)诊断代码,从护理和医生病历中确定谵妄。结果共有 43723 名(81.3%)患者接受了神经肌肉阻滞治疗。约有 2259 名(4.2%)患者出现谵妄,其中有 1884 名(4.3%)患者使用了 ND-NMBA,375 名(3.7%)患者未使用 ND-NMBA。在调整后的分析中,施用 ND-NMBA 与术后谵妄的较高风险呈剂量依赖关系(调整后的几率比 [ORadj] 1.15;95% 置信区间 [CI],1.01-1.31;P = .038 和 1.09;95% CI,1.06-1.12;P < .001,达到 95% 的抽搐减少率所需的有效剂量每增加一个单位)。38,143例(87.2%)接受ND-NMBAs治疗的患者也接受了逆转剂治疗,与不接受逆转剂治疗相比,神经肌肉恢复受损(拔管前四次训练比值<95;ORadj 0.60;95% CI,0.49-0.74;P < .001)和谵妄(ORadj 0.73;95% CI,0.64-0.83;P < .001)的风险较低。使用逆转剂可消除 ND-NMBAs 对谵妄风险的不利影响(使用逆转剂的 ORadj 为 1.07;95% CI 为 0.94-1.23;P = .30;未使用逆转剂的 ORadj 为 1.52;95% CI 为 1.28-1.79;P < .001)。结论全身麻醉期间的神经肌肉阻滞与较高的术后谵妄风险之间存在剂量依赖关系。使用逆转剂可降低这一风险,并有助于减少术后谵妄的发生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信