Mike M. Webster, Nicholas A. R. Jones, Akanksha N. Shah, Ashley J. W. Ward
{"title":"Mixed‐Species Fish Shoals: Any Port in a Storm?","authors":"Mike M. Webster, Nicholas A. R. Jones, Akanksha N. Shah, Ashley J. W. Ward","doi":"10.1111/faf.12902","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Mixed‐species fish shoals are common, and form for a variety of reasons. We suggest that short term mixed‐species shoals, that persist for minutes or hours, might form because lone individuals (or small groups) of one species might benefit from joining larger groups of heterospecifics to reduce predation risk. We carried out a literature survey, which revealed that mixed‐species groups seldom contain equal numbers of species; rather one or two dominate, with others present as small minorities. Furthermore, we found that the proportion of minority species decreases as absolute shoal size increases. We suggest that although minority members of mixed‐species groups might suffer costs associated with being odd, they might often still do better by grouping than if they remained alone. We term this ‘any port in a storm’. This explanation makes several predictions and assumptions, and we suggest approaches for testing these. For example, minority members should attempt to form single‐species groups when the opportunity arises, and mixed species‐groups should coincide with periods of heightened predation risk. Mixed‐species groups may be influenced by the distribution of shelter, and further work is needed to disentangle the relative importance of aggregation versus social attraction in the formation of mixed‐species‐shoals. This account of mixed‐species groups does not exclude other ecological functions, such as forager‐guild formation, but may explain cases of short‐term associations of minority species with numerically dominant species in fish shoals. Our predictions are readily testable, and we hope they spur further research in this area.","PeriodicalId":169,"journal":{"name":"Fish and Fisheries","volume":"39 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fish and Fisheries","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/faf.12902","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FISHERIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Mixed‐species fish shoals are common, and form for a variety of reasons. We suggest that short term mixed‐species shoals, that persist for minutes or hours, might form because lone individuals (or small groups) of one species might benefit from joining larger groups of heterospecifics to reduce predation risk. We carried out a literature survey, which revealed that mixed‐species groups seldom contain equal numbers of species; rather one or two dominate, with others present as small minorities. Furthermore, we found that the proportion of minority species decreases as absolute shoal size increases. We suggest that although minority members of mixed‐species groups might suffer costs associated with being odd, they might often still do better by grouping than if they remained alone. We term this ‘any port in a storm’. This explanation makes several predictions and assumptions, and we suggest approaches for testing these. For example, minority members should attempt to form single‐species groups when the opportunity arises, and mixed species‐groups should coincide with periods of heightened predation risk. Mixed‐species groups may be influenced by the distribution of shelter, and further work is needed to disentangle the relative importance of aggregation versus social attraction in the formation of mixed‐species‐shoals. This account of mixed‐species groups does not exclude other ecological functions, such as forager‐guild formation, but may explain cases of short‐term associations of minority species with numerically dominant species in fish shoals. Our predictions are readily testable, and we hope they spur further research in this area.
期刊介绍:
Fish and Fisheries adopts a broad, interdisciplinary approach to the subject of fish biology and fisheries. It draws contributions in the form of major synoptic papers and syntheses or meta-analyses that lay out new approaches, re-examine existing findings, methods or theory, and discuss papers and commentaries from diverse areas. Focal areas include fish palaeontology, molecular biology and ecology, genetics, biochemistry, physiology, ecology, behaviour, evolutionary studies, conservation, assessment, population dynamics, mathematical modelling, ecosystem analysis and the social, economic and policy aspects of fisheries where they are grounded in a scientific approach. A paper in Fish and Fisheries must draw upon all key elements of the existing literature on a topic, normally have a broad geographic and/or taxonomic scope, and provide general points which make it compelling to a wide range of readers whatever their geographical location. So, in short, we aim to publish articles that make syntheses of old or synoptic, long-term or spatially widespread data, introduce or consolidate fresh concepts or theory, or, in the Ghoti section, briefly justify preliminary, new synoptic ideas. Please note that authors of submissions not meeting this mandate will be directed to the appropriate primary literature.