Méline Vautrin , Eric Teillet , Daniel Ahmad , Christine Urbano , Arnaud Thomas
{"title":"Free comment versus word association test: Methodological insights for sensory analysis","authors":"Méline Vautrin , Eric Teillet , Daniel Ahmad , Christine Urbano , Arnaud Thomas","doi":"10.1016/j.foodqual.2025.105555","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study compares the Free Comment method and the Word Association Test as two consumer-based approaches for the auditory characterization of single-serve coffee machines. A total of 133 consumers evaluated four machine sounds using both methods in an intra-subject design. While both approaches yielded largely similar sensory interpretations and highlighted nearly the same key descriptors, the Word Association Test resulted in clearer product discrimination and identified more significant associations. These findings suggest that, despite their conceptual similarity, the two methods differ in the number and strength of product-term associations they generate. Further research could investigate the extent to which these findings generalize to other sensory modalities, such as smell or taste, where associative and emotional memory processes may influence consumer responses.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":322,"journal":{"name":"Food Quality and Preference","volume":"130 ","pages":"Article 105555"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Quality and Preference","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950329325001302","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study compares the Free Comment method and the Word Association Test as two consumer-based approaches for the auditory characterization of single-serve coffee machines. A total of 133 consumers evaluated four machine sounds using both methods in an intra-subject design. While both approaches yielded largely similar sensory interpretations and highlighted nearly the same key descriptors, the Word Association Test resulted in clearer product discrimination and identified more significant associations. These findings suggest that, despite their conceptual similarity, the two methods differ in the number and strength of product-term associations they generate. Further research could investigate the extent to which these findings generalize to other sensory modalities, such as smell or taste, where associative and emotional memory processes may influence consumer responses.
期刊介绍:
Food Quality and Preference is a journal devoted to sensory, consumer and behavioural research in food and non-food products. It publishes original research, critical reviews, and short communications in sensory and consumer science, and sensometrics. In addition, the journal publishes special invited issues on important timely topics and from relevant conferences. These are aimed at bridging the gap between research and application, bringing together authors and readers in consumer and market research, sensory science, sensometrics and sensory evaluation, nutrition and food choice, as well as food research, product development and sensory quality assurance. Submissions to Food Quality and Preference are limited to papers that include some form of human measurement; papers that are limited to physical/chemical measures or the routine application of sensory, consumer or econometric analysis will not be considered unless they specifically make a novel scientific contribution in line with the journal''s coverage as outlined below.