Embedding justice into climate policies through participatory approaches: prospects and pitfalls toward community-based adaptation pathways in Bologna, Italy
Cassandra Fontana , Andrea Testi , Giovanni Allegretti , Iacopo Zetti , Maddalena Rossi
{"title":"Embedding justice into climate policies through participatory approaches: prospects and pitfalls toward community-based adaptation pathways in Bologna, Italy","authors":"Cassandra Fontana , Andrea Testi , Giovanni Allegretti , Iacopo Zetti , Maddalena Rossi","doi":"10.1016/j.cities.2025.105998","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Cities across the world are increasingly confronted with the consequences of climate change, requiring the urgent identification and implementation of climate mitigation and adaptation strategies. As these policies and interventions impact current social, spatial, and environmental configurations, the decision-making process is inherently characterised by conflicts of values and interests. This adds to the unequal distribution of burdens and risks that already concern the most vulnerable and excluded groups, raising questions about how planning processes dealing with environmental and climate issues can ensure equity and legitimacy. Drawing from post-political theory and agonistic planning perspectives, the paper is grounded in the assumption that procedural justice and democratic confrontation are essential to addressing the structural causes and uneven impacts of climate change. Using Bologna, Italy, as a case study, it explores the intersections between community-based climate adaptation and institution-led participatory processes to challenge the post-political condition of climate governance. The paper investigates the role of a specific category of urban commons, namely the Neighborhood Houses (<em>Case di Quartiere</em>), as potential arenas for re-politicising climate discourse. It explores how their widespread spatial distribution across the city and their embeddedness within complex governance configurations can promote the articulation of citizen-led demands, particularly those related to climate justice. Drawing on four years of research involving data collection, participant observation, and the co-design of a participatory initiative in Bologna, the paper offers a critical analysis of the opportunities and limitations that decentralised institutions face in fostering stronger linkages between community-based organisations and municipal authorities, ultimately contributing to a more just and democratic approach to climate policy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48405,"journal":{"name":"Cities","volume":"163 ","pages":"Article 105998"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cities","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264275125002987","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"URBAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Cities across the world are increasingly confronted with the consequences of climate change, requiring the urgent identification and implementation of climate mitigation and adaptation strategies. As these policies and interventions impact current social, spatial, and environmental configurations, the decision-making process is inherently characterised by conflicts of values and interests. This adds to the unequal distribution of burdens and risks that already concern the most vulnerable and excluded groups, raising questions about how planning processes dealing with environmental and climate issues can ensure equity and legitimacy. Drawing from post-political theory and agonistic planning perspectives, the paper is grounded in the assumption that procedural justice and democratic confrontation are essential to addressing the structural causes and uneven impacts of climate change. Using Bologna, Italy, as a case study, it explores the intersections between community-based climate adaptation and institution-led participatory processes to challenge the post-political condition of climate governance. The paper investigates the role of a specific category of urban commons, namely the Neighborhood Houses (Case di Quartiere), as potential arenas for re-politicising climate discourse. It explores how their widespread spatial distribution across the city and their embeddedness within complex governance configurations can promote the articulation of citizen-led demands, particularly those related to climate justice. Drawing on four years of research involving data collection, participant observation, and the co-design of a participatory initiative in Bologna, the paper offers a critical analysis of the opportunities and limitations that decentralised institutions face in fostering stronger linkages between community-based organisations and municipal authorities, ultimately contributing to a more just and democratic approach to climate policy.
世界各地的城市日益面临气候变化的后果,需要紧急确定和实施气候减缓和适应战略。由于这些政策和干预措施影响当前的社会、空间和环境配置,决策过程本身就具有价值观和利益冲突的特征。这加剧了最脆弱和最受排斥群体所面临的负担和风险的不平等分配,引发了人们对处理环境和气候问题的规划过程如何确保公平和合法性的质疑。从后政治理论和竞争规划的角度出发,本文基于程序正义和民主对抗对于解决气候变化的结构性原因和不平衡影响至关重要的假设。本文以意大利博洛尼亚为例,探讨了以社区为基础的气候适应与机构主导的参与性进程之间的交集,以挑战气候治理的后政治条件。本文调查了一类特定的城市公地的作用,即邻里住宅(Case di Quartiere),作为气候话语重新政治化的潜在场所。它探讨了它们在城市中的广泛空间分布以及它们在复杂治理结构中的嵌入性如何促进公民主导需求的表达,特别是与气候正义相关的需求。通过四年的研究,包括数据收集、参与性观察和博洛尼亚参与性倡议的共同设计,本文对分散式机构在促进社区组织和市政当局之间建立更强联系方面面临的机遇和限制进行了批判性分析,最终为气候政策的制定做出了更公正和民主的贡献。
期刊介绍:
Cities offers a comprehensive range of articles on all aspects of urban policy. It provides an international and interdisciplinary platform for the exchange of ideas and information between urban planners and policy makers from national and local government, non-government organizations, academia and consultancy. The primary aims of the journal are to analyse and assess past and present urban development and management as a reflection of effective, ineffective and non-existent planning policies; and the promotion of the implementation of appropriate urban policies in both the developed and the developing world.