The cortilymph wave: Its relation to the traveling wave, auditory-nerve responses, and low-frequency downward glides

IF 2.5 2区 医学 Q1 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
John J. Guinan Jr
{"title":"The cortilymph wave: Its relation to the traveling wave, auditory-nerve responses, and low-frequency downward glides","authors":"John J. Guinan Jr","doi":"10.1016/j.heares.2025.109279","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In the cochlear base, recent data show that amplification of the traveling wave does <em>not</em> come from outer-hair-cell (OHC) forces acting on the basilar membrane (BM). Instead, traveling wave amplification is hypothesized to come from OHCs producing cyclic cortilymph flow along the organ-of-Corti (OoC) tunnels (the “cortilymph wave”), which changes OoC cross-section area and adds energy to the scala-media-fluid traveling wave. This hypothesis accounts for amplification of cochlear-motion in the base but may not work in the low-frequency apex. One base-to-apex difference is the OHC-membrane resistance-capacitance (RC) low-pass filter. Measurements in live animals found the OHC-RC corner frequency, Fc, was ∼3 kHz. At tone frequencies &gt;&gt;Fc, the RC filter delays the cortilymph wave from the traveling wave by ¼ cycle, which provides the correct timing for OoC-area-change traveling-wave amplification. However, at frequencies &lt;&lt;Fc, the RC-filter delay is shorter, so traveling-wave amplification may be different in the low-frequency cochlear apex. A source of data for understanding low-frequency cochlear mechanics is auditory-nerve (AN) data. AN rate-vs-level functions show two components separated by a phase jump. The frequency relative to the fiber characteristic frequency (CF) where the jump is a phase reversal varies across fibers. This variation is hypothesized to be due to a variable phase relationship of the cortilymph and traveling waves. It is further hypothesized (1) that low-CF AN-tuning-curve “side lobes” have short group delays because they are excited by a cortilymph wave that flows ahead of the traveling wave, and (2) low-CF AN-fiber impulse-response instantaneous-frequency-versus-time profiles (glides) are downward mostly due to a cortilymph wave driven from more basal OHCs. A long downward glide may indicate the presence of a cortilymph wave. Cochlear output is driven by both the traveling wave and the cortilymph wave.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12881,"journal":{"name":"Hearing Research","volume":"462 ","pages":"Article 109279"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hearing Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378595525000978","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the cochlear base, recent data show that amplification of the traveling wave does not come from outer-hair-cell (OHC) forces acting on the basilar membrane (BM). Instead, traveling wave amplification is hypothesized to come from OHCs producing cyclic cortilymph flow along the organ-of-Corti (OoC) tunnels (the “cortilymph wave”), which changes OoC cross-section area and adds energy to the scala-media-fluid traveling wave. This hypothesis accounts for amplification of cochlear-motion in the base but may not work in the low-frequency apex. One base-to-apex difference is the OHC-membrane resistance-capacitance (RC) low-pass filter. Measurements in live animals found the OHC-RC corner frequency, Fc, was ∼3 kHz. At tone frequencies >>Fc, the RC filter delays the cortilymph wave from the traveling wave by ¼ cycle, which provides the correct timing for OoC-area-change traveling-wave amplification. However, at frequencies <<Fc, the RC-filter delay is shorter, so traveling-wave amplification may be different in the low-frequency cochlear apex. A source of data for understanding low-frequency cochlear mechanics is auditory-nerve (AN) data. AN rate-vs-level functions show two components separated by a phase jump. The frequency relative to the fiber characteristic frequency (CF) where the jump is a phase reversal varies across fibers. This variation is hypothesized to be due to a variable phase relationship of the cortilymph and traveling waves. It is further hypothesized (1) that low-CF AN-tuning-curve “side lobes” have short group delays because they are excited by a cortilymph wave that flows ahead of the traveling wave, and (2) low-CF AN-fiber impulse-response instantaneous-frequency-versus-time profiles (glides) are downward mostly due to a cortilymph wave driven from more basal OHCs. A long downward glide may indicate the presence of a cortilymph wave. Cochlear output is driven by both the traveling wave and the cortilymph wave.
皮质淋巴波:它与行波、听神经反应和低频下行滑动的关系
在耳蜗基底,最近的数据显示行波的放大不是来自于作用在基底膜上的外毛细胞(OHC)力。相反,行波放大被假设来自于OHCs沿着器官- corti (OoC)隧道产生循环皮质淋巴流(“皮质淋巴波”),它改变了OoC的横截面面积,并增加了标量-介质-流体行波的能量。这一假说解释了耳蜗运动在基底区的放大,但可能不适用于低频顶点。一个基到顶点的区别是ohc膜电阻-电容(RC)低通滤波器。在活体动物中测量发现,OHC-RC角频率Fc为~ 3 kHz。在音调频率>;>Fc, RC滤波器将皮质淋巴波从行波中延迟¼周期,这为ooc -面积变化行波放大提供了正确的时序。但在频率<;<;Fc处,rc滤波器延迟较短,因此行波放大在低频耳蜗尖处可能有所不同。了解低频耳蜗力学的一个数据来源是听神经(AN)数据。AN速率对电平函数显示由相位跳变分开的两个分量。相对于光纤特征频率(CF)的频率,其中跳变是相位反转,在光纤之间变化。这种变化被假设是由于皮质淋巴和行波的可变相位关系。进一步假设:(1)低cf - an调谐曲线“侧叶”具有较短的群延迟,因为它们是由先于行波流动的皮质淋巴波激发的;(2)低cf - an光纤脉冲响应的瞬时频率与时间分布(滑降)主要是由更基础的OHCs驱动的皮质淋巴波导致的。长时间向下滑动可能表明皮质淋巴波的存在。耳蜗输出由行波和皮质淋巴波共同驱动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Hearing Research
Hearing Research 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
14.30%
发文量
163
审稿时长
75 days
期刊介绍: The aim of the journal is to provide a forum for papers concerned with basic peripheral and central auditory mechanisms. Emphasis is on experimental and clinical studies, but theoretical and methodological papers will also be considered. The journal publishes original research papers, review and mini- review articles, rapid communications, method/protocol and perspective articles. Papers submitted should deal with auditory anatomy, physiology, psychophysics, imaging, modeling and behavioural studies in animals and humans, as well as hearing aids and cochlear implants. Papers dealing with the vestibular system are also considered for publication. Papers on comparative aspects of hearing and on effects of drugs and environmental contaminants on hearing function will also be considered. Clinical papers will be accepted when they contribute to the understanding of normal and pathological hearing functions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信