{"title":"Functional asymmetry in processivity clamp proteins.","authors":"Sam Mahdi,Penny J Beuning,Dmitry M Korzhnev","doi":"10.1016/j.bpj.2025.04.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Symmetric homo-oligomeric proteins comprising multiple copies of identical subunits are abundant in all domains of life. To fulfill their biological function, these complexes undergo conformational changes, binding events, or post-translational modifications leading to loss of symmetry. Processivity clamp proteins that encircle DNA and play multiple roles in DNA replication and repair are archetypical homo-oligomeric symmetric protein complexes. The symmetrical nature of processivity clamps enables simultaneous interactions with multiple protein binding partners; such interactions result in asymmetric changes that facilitate the transition between clamp loading and DNA replication, and between DNA replication and repair. The ring-shaped processivity clamps are opened and loaded onto DNA by clamp-loader complexes via asymmetric intermediates with one of the intermonomer interfaces disrupted, undergo spontaneous opening events, and bind heterogeneous partners. Eukaryotic clamp proteins are subject to ubiquitylation, SUMOylation, and acetylation affecting their biological functions. There is increasing evidence of the functional asymmetry of the processivity clamp proteins from structural, biophysical, and computational studies. Here, we review the symmetry and asymmetry of processivity clamps and their roles in regulating the various functions of the clamps.","PeriodicalId":8922,"journal":{"name":"Biophysical journal","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biophysical journal","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2025.04.014","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Symmetric homo-oligomeric proteins comprising multiple copies of identical subunits are abundant in all domains of life. To fulfill their biological function, these complexes undergo conformational changes, binding events, or post-translational modifications leading to loss of symmetry. Processivity clamp proteins that encircle DNA and play multiple roles in DNA replication and repair are archetypical homo-oligomeric symmetric protein complexes. The symmetrical nature of processivity clamps enables simultaneous interactions with multiple protein binding partners; such interactions result in asymmetric changes that facilitate the transition between clamp loading and DNA replication, and between DNA replication and repair. The ring-shaped processivity clamps are opened and loaded onto DNA by clamp-loader complexes via asymmetric intermediates with one of the intermonomer interfaces disrupted, undergo spontaneous opening events, and bind heterogeneous partners. Eukaryotic clamp proteins are subject to ubiquitylation, SUMOylation, and acetylation affecting their biological functions. There is increasing evidence of the functional asymmetry of the processivity clamp proteins from structural, biophysical, and computational studies. Here, we review the symmetry and asymmetry of processivity clamps and their roles in regulating the various functions of the clamps.
期刊介绍:
BJ publishes original articles, letters, and perspectives on important problems in modern biophysics. The papers should be written so as to be of interest to a broad community of biophysicists. BJ welcomes experimental studies that employ quantitative physical approaches for the study of biological systems, including or spanning scales from molecule to whole organism. Experimental studies of a purely descriptive or phenomenological nature, with no theoretical or mechanistic underpinning, are not appropriate for publication in BJ. Theoretical studies should offer new insights into the understanding ofexperimental results or suggest new experimentally testable hypotheses. Articles reporting significant methodological or technological advances, which have potential to open new areas of biophysical investigation, are also suitable for publication in BJ. Papers describing improvements in accuracy or speed of existing methods or extra detail within methods described previously are not suitable for BJ.