Endothelin-1 Participates in the Pathogenesis of Prurigo Nodularis by Promoting NGF Expression via Endothelial Receptor B in Epidermal Keratinocytes and Dorsal Root Ganglion Cells

IF 12.6 1区 医学 Q1 ALLERGY
Allergy Pub Date : 2025-04-18 DOI:10.1111/all.16564
Lai-San Wong, Jenq-Lin Yang, Yu-Ta Yen, Chih-Hung Lee, Jen-Hau Yang
{"title":"Endothelin-1 Participates in the Pathogenesis of Prurigo Nodularis by Promoting NGF Expression via Endothelial Receptor B in Epidermal Keratinocytes and Dorsal Root Ganglion Cells","authors":"Lai-San Wong,&nbsp;Jenq-Lin Yang,&nbsp;Yu-Ta Yen,&nbsp;Chih-Hung Lee,&nbsp;Jen-Hau Yang","doi":"10.1111/all.16564","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Prurigo nodularis (PN) is a debilitating chronic skin disorder characterized by intractable itch and nodular lesions [<span>1</span>]. While its exact etiology remains unclear, emerging evidence suggests a complex interplay between neuronal sensitization and cutaneous changes [<span>2</span>]. Recent studies indicate increased epidermal branching and heightened expression of neuroplasticity-related genes regulating sensory neuron growth in PN [<span>3</span>]. Notably, nerve growth factor (NGF), a neurotrophic factor essential for nociceptive signaling [<span>4</span>], is highly expressed in PN compared to atopic dermatitis (AD) and brachioradial pruritus. Its elevated expression correlates with increased epidermal nerve fiber branching [<span>3</span>]. This NGF-mediated neuroplasticity may contribute to neuronal alterations in PN.</p><p>In our previous study, we identified significantly elevated endothelin-1 (EDN1) expression in PN lesional skin and serum, suggesting its role in local and systemic modulation [<span>5</span>]. Recent single-cell analysis further revealed increased EDN1 expression in PN compared to AD and healthy controls, underscoring its disease-specific significance [<span>6</span>]. While EDN1 is recognized as a histamine-independent pruritogen [<span>7</span>], its role in neural sensitization remains unclear. In particular, its direct impact on dorsal root ganglion (DRG) neurons has not been explored. Here, we investigate the interaction between EDN1 and NGF in keratinocytes and DRG neurons, contributing to neuronal sensitization in PN.</p><p>To elucidate the role of NGF, we assessed NGF and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) expression in PN lesional skin, as BDNF, another neurotrophic factor involved in neuronal growth and sensitization, was assessed for comparison. Immunofluorescence revealed significantly higher epidermal NGF expression in PN (5.25 ± 2.49) than in healthy controls (1.09 ± 0.93, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01) (Figure 1a), whereas BDNF expression remained comparable (Figure S1a). Serum NGF levels did not differ significantly between patients with PN (113.28 ± 143.17 pg/mL) and controls (490.22 ± 703.97 pg/mL), indicating a localized NGF effect in PN pathogenesis (Figure 1a).</p><p>Next, we examined how EDN1 regulates NGF expression in the epidermis. Immunofluorescence demonstrated increased NGF expression following EDN1 (100 nM) stimulation in keratinocytes (Figure S1b). Western blot analysis revealed a peak in NGF protein levels at 18 h poststimulation (Figure S1c). siRNA knockdown of EDNRA and EDNRB in HaCaT cells showed that EDN1-induced NGF upregulation was significantly attenuated in EDNRB-deficient cells but remained unaffected by EDNRA knockdown (Figure 1b). These findings indicate that EDNRB, rather than EDNRA, is the key mediator of EDN1-induced NGF expression in keratinocytes.</p><p>Given the key role of neuronal pathways in PN, we investigated EDN1's impact on NGF expression in DRG neurons. EDN1 (100 nM) stimulation significantly increased NGF protein expression, peaking at 18 h, as confirmed by western blot (Figure 1c).</p><p>Since neurite outgrowth and elongation are critical indicators of neuronal sensitization, we pretreated DRG neurons with a neutralizing NGF antibody (1 μg/mL) and observed a substantial increase in neurite length in the EDN1-treated group (102.61 ± 51.83 μm) compared to controls (65.77 ± 38.38 μm, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.0001), which was attenuated by NGF neutralization (74.01 ± 35.1 μm). The proportion of DRG neurite branching was similarly increased with EDN1 treatment and reduced by NGF blockade (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05) (Figure 2a). To delineate the receptor-specific effects, DRG neurons were pretreated with selective EDNRA (BQ123) and EDNRB (BQ788) inhibitors. EDN1 treatment significantly increased neurite length (60.7 ± 39 μm, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01) compared to controls (42.6 ± 27.6 μm). This effect was markedly reduced with EDNRB inhibition (39.8 ± 25.9 μm, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.0001) but not with EDNRA inhibition. A similar pattern was observed in DRG neurite branching (Figure 2b).</p><p>We show that EDN1 enhances NGF expression in keratinocytes and DRG neurons, promoting neurite outgrowth. Notably, EDNRB, but not EDNRA, regulates this pathway, underscoring its role in peripheral nerve remodeling. These findings suggest that EDN1-induced NGF upregulation contributes to neural modulation in PN. Moreover, this signaling cascade highlights distinct roles of EDNRB and EDNRA in physiology. Targeting EDNRB may provide a novel therapeutic strategy to interrupt the chronic itch-scratch cycle by blocking EDN1-NGF signaling.</p><p>Lai-San Wong: conceptualization (lead), formal analysis (lead), writing – original draft (lead), writing – review and editing (equal). Jenq-Lin Yang: conceptualization (supporting), funding acquisition (equal), writing – original draft (supporting), writing – review and editing (equal). Yu-Ta Yen: investigation (equal), writing – original draft (supporting), writing – review and editing (equal). Chih-Hung Lee: conceptualization (supporting), funding acquisition (equal), supervision (equal), writing – original draft (supporting), writing – review and editing (equal). Jen-Hau Yang: conceptualization (supporting), formal analysis (supporting), investigation (equal), supervision (equal), writing – original draft (supporting), writing – review and editing (equal).</p><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest.</p>","PeriodicalId":122,"journal":{"name":"Allergy","volume":"80 5","pages":"1530-1533"},"PeriodicalIF":12.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/all.16564","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Allergy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/all.16564","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Prurigo nodularis (PN) is a debilitating chronic skin disorder characterized by intractable itch and nodular lesions [1]. While its exact etiology remains unclear, emerging evidence suggests a complex interplay between neuronal sensitization and cutaneous changes [2]. Recent studies indicate increased epidermal branching and heightened expression of neuroplasticity-related genes regulating sensory neuron growth in PN [3]. Notably, nerve growth factor (NGF), a neurotrophic factor essential for nociceptive signaling [4], is highly expressed in PN compared to atopic dermatitis (AD) and brachioradial pruritus. Its elevated expression correlates with increased epidermal nerve fiber branching [3]. This NGF-mediated neuroplasticity may contribute to neuronal alterations in PN.

In our previous study, we identified significantly elevated endothelin-1 (EDN1) expression in PN lesional skin and serum, suggesting its role in local and systemic modulation [5]. Recent single-cell analysis further revealed increased EDN1 expression in PN compared to AD and healthy controls, underscoring its disease-specific significance [6]. While EDN1 is recognized as a histamine-independent pruritogen [7], its role in neural sensitization remains unclear. In particular, its direct impact on dorsal root ganglion (DRG) neurons has not been explored. Here, we investigate the interaction between EDN1 and NGF in keratinocytes and DRG neurons, contributing to neuronal sensitization in PN.

To elucidate the role of NGF, we assessed NGF and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) expression in PN lesional skin, as BDNF, another neurotrophic factor involved in neuronal growth and sensitization, was assessed for comparison. Immunofluorescence revealed significantly higher epidermal NGF expression in PN (5.25 ± 2.49) than in healthy controls (1.09 ± 0.93, p < 0.01) (Figure 1a), whereas BDNF expression remained comparable (Figure S1a). Serum NGF levels did not differ significantly between patients with PN (113.28 ± 143.17 pg/mL) and controls (490.22 ± 703.97 pg/mL), indicating a localized NGF effect in PN pathogenesis (Figure 1a).

Next, we examined how EDN1 regulates NGF expression in the epidermis. Immunofluorescence demonstrated increased NGF expression following EDN1 (100 nM) stimulation in keratinocytes (Figure S1b). Western blot analysis revealed a peak in NGF protein levels at 18 h poststimulation (Figure S1c). siRNA knockdown of EDNRA and EDNRB in HaCaT cells showed that EDN1-induced NGF upregulation was significantly attenuated in EDNRB-deficient cells but remained unaffected by EDNRA knockdown (Figure 1b). These findings indicate that EDNRB, rather than EDNRA, is the key mediator of EDN1-induced NGF expression in keratinocytes.

Given the key role of neuronal pathways in PN, we investigated EDN1's impact on NGF expression in DRG neurons. EDN1 (100 nM) stimulation significantly increased NGF protein expression, peaking at 18 h, as confirmed by western blot (Figure 1c).

Since neurite outgrowth and elongation are critical indicators of neuronal sensitization, we pretreated DRG neurons with a neutralizing NGF antibody (1 μg/mL) and observed a substantial increase in neurite length in the EDN1-treated group (102.61 ± 51.83 μm) compared to controls (65.77 ± 38.38 μm, p < 0.0001), which was attenuated by NGF neutralization (74.01 ± 35.1 μm). The proportion of DRG neurite branching was similarly increased with EDN1 treatment and reduced by NGF blockade (p < 0.05) (Figure 2a). To delineate the receptor-specific effects, DRG neurons were pretreated with selective EDNRA (BQ123) and EDNRB (BQ788) inhibitors. EDN1 treatment significantly increased neurite length (60.7 ± 39 μm, p < 0.01) compared to controls (42.6 ± 27.6 μm). This effect was markedly reduced with EDNRB inhibition (39.8 ± 25.9 μm, p < 0.0001) but not with EDNRA inhibition. A similar pattern was observed in DRG neurite branching (Figure 2b).

We show that EDN1 enhances NGF expression in keratinocytes and DRG neurons, promoting neurite outgrowth. Notably, EDNRB, but not EDNRA, regulates this pathway, underscoring its role in peripheral nerve remodeling. These findings suggest that EDN1-induced NGF upregulation contributes to neural modulation in PN. Moreover, this signaling cascade highlights distinct roles of EDNRB and EDNRA in physiology. Targeting EDNRB may provide a novel therapeutic strategy to interrupt the chronic itch-scratch cycle by blocking EDN1-NGF signaling.

Lai-San Wong: conceptualization (lead), formal analysis (lead), writing – original draft (lead), writing – review and editing (equal). Jenq-Lin Yang: conceptualization (supporting), funding acquisition (equal), writing – original draft (supporting), writing – review and editing (equal). Yu-Ta Yen: investigation (equal), writing – original draft (supporting), writing – review and editing (equal). Chih-Hung Lee: conceptualization (supporting), funding acquisition (equal), supervision (equal), writing – original draft (supporting), writing – review and editing (equal). Jen-Hau Yang: conceptualization (supporting), formal analysis (supporting), investigation (equal), supervision (equal), writing – original draft (supporting), writing – review and editing (equal).

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abstract Image

内皮素-1通过表皮角质形成细胞和背根神经节细胞内皮受体B促进NGF表达参与结节性痒疹的发病机制
结节性痒疹(PN)是一种衰弱的慢性皮肤病,其特征是顽固性瘙痒和结节性病变[1]。虽然其确切的病因尚不清楚,但新出现的证据表明神经元致敏和皮肤变化之间存在复杂的相互作用。最近的研究表明,在PN[3]中,表皮分支增加,调节感觉神经元生长的神经可塑性相关基因表达增加。值得注意的是,与特应性皮炎(AD)和肱桡瘙痒相比,神经生长因子(NGF),一种对伤害性信号通路[4]至关重要的神经营养因子,在PN中高表达。其表达升高与表皮神经纤维分支增多有关。这种ngf介导的神经可塑性可能有助于PN的神经元改变。在我们之前的研究中,我们发现内皮素-1 (EDN1)在PN病变皮肤和血清中的表达显著升高,表明其在局部和全身调节bb0中的作用。最近的单细胞分析进一步显示,与AD和健康对照相比,EDN1在PN中的表达增加,强调了其疾病特异性意义[6]。虽然EDN1被认为是一种不依赖组胺的瘙痒原b[7],但其在神经致敏中的作用尚不清楚。特别是,其对背根神经节(DRG)神经元的直接影响尚未探讨。在这里,我们研究了EDN1和NGF在角化细胞和DRG神经元中的相互作用,促进了PN的神经元致敏。为了阐明NGF的作用,我们评估了NGF和脑源性神经营养因子(BDNF)在PN病变皮肤中的表达,并评估了另一种参与神经元生长和致敏的神经营养因子BDNF进行比较。免疫荧光显示,PN中表皮NGF的表达(5.25±2.49)明显高于健康对照组(1.09±0.93,p &lt; 0.01)(图1a),而BDNF的表达保持相当(图S1a)。血清NGF水平在PN患者(113.28±143.17 pg/mL)和对照组(490.22±703.97 pg/mL)之间没有显著差异,表明NGF在PN发病机制中有局部作用(图1a)。接下来,我们研究了EDN1如何调节表皮中NGF的表达。免疫荧光显示EDN1 (100 nM)刺激后角化细胞中NGF表达增加(图S1b)。Western blot分析显示,刺激后18小时NGF蛋白水平达到峰值(图S1c)。HaCaT细胞中siRNA敲低EDNRA和EDNRB表明,edn1诱导的NGF上调在EDNRB缺陷细胞中显著减弱,但EDNRA敲低不受影响(图1b)。这些发现表明EDNRB,而不是EDNRA,是edn1诱导的角化细胞中NGF表达的关键介质。鉴于神经元通路在PN中的关键作用,我们研究了EDN1对DRG神经元中NGF表达的影响。western blot证实,EDN1 (100 nM)刺激显著增加NGF蛋白表达,在18 h达到峰值(图1c)。由于神经突的生长和伸长是神经元致敏的关键指标,我们用中和NGF抗体(1 μg/mL)预处理DRG神经元,观察到edn1处理组的神经突长度(102.61±51.83 μm)比对照组(65.77±38.38 μm, p &lt; 0.0001)显著增加,而NGF中和(74.01±35.1 μm)则使其减弱。EDN1处理后DRG神经突分支比例同样增加,NGF阻断后减少(p &lt; 0.05)(图2a)。为了描述受体特异性作用,用选择性EDNRA (BQ123)和EDNRB (BQ788)抑制剂预处理DRG神经元。与对照组(42.6±27.6 μm)相比,EDN1治疗显著增加了神经突长度(60.7±39 μm, p &lt; 0.01)。EDNRB抑制显著降低了这种效应(39.8±25.9 μm, p &lt; 0.0001),而EDNRA抑制则没有。在DRG神经突分支中也观察到类似的模式(图2b)。我们发现EDN1增强了角化细胞和DRG神经元中NGF的表达,促进了神经突起的生长。值得注意的是,EDNRB而不是EDNRA调节了这一途径,强调了其在周围神经重塑中的作用。这些发现表明,edn1诱导的NGF上调有助于PN的神经调节。此外,这种信号级联突出了EDNRB和EDNRA在生理上的不同作用。靶向EDNRB可能提供一种新的治疗策略,通过阻断EDN1-NGF信号传导来中断慢性瘙痒-抓伤周期。黄来三:构思(导),形式分析(导),写作-原稿(导),写作-审稿编辑(平等)。杨珍琳:构思(支持)、资金获取(平等)、撰写-原稿(支持)、撰写-审稿编辑(平等)。严玉大:调查(同等),写作-原稿(配套),写作-审校(同等)。 李志雄:构思(支持)、获得经费(平等)、监督(平等)、撰写-原稿(支持)、撰写-审校(平等)。杨仁豪:构思(辅助)、形式分析(辅助)、调查(等同)、监督(等同)、写作-原稿(辅助)、写作-审校(等同)。作者声明无利益冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Allergy
Allergy 医学-过敏
CiteScore
26.10
自引率
9.70%
发文量
393
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Allergy is an international and multidisciplinary journal that aims to advance, impact, and communicate all aspects of the discipline of Allergy/Immunology. It publishes original articles, reviews, position papers, guidelines, editorials, news and commentaries, letters to the editors, and correspondences. The journal accepts articles based on their scientific merit and quality. Allergy seeks to maintain contact between basic and clinical Allergy/Immunology and encourages contributions from contributors and readers from all countries. In addition to its publication, Allergy also provides abstracting and indexing information. Some of the databases that include Allergy abstracts are Abstracts on Hygiene & Communicable Disease, Academic Search Alumni Edition, AgBiotech News & Information, AGRICOLA Database, Biological Abstracts, PubMed Dietary Supplement Subset, and Global Health, among others.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信