Personality traits and traditional philanthropy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 6.4 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
Wiebke Bleidorn,Alexander G Stahlmann,Ulrich Orth,Luke D Smillie,Christopher J Hopwood
{"title":"Personality traits and traditional philanthropy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Wiebke Bleidorn,Alexander G Stahlmann,Ulrich Orth,Luke D Smillie,Christopher J Hopwood","doi":"10.1037/pspp0000556","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Volunteering and charitable giving are core examples of traditional philanthropy that contribute to the health of democratic societies and individual well-being. Differences in people's willingness to engage in these behaviors hint at a role of psychological factors that foster or hinder these types of philanthropic engagement. Theory and empirical research suggest that broad personality traits may shape volunteering and charitable giving. However, existing evidence for links between specific traits and philanthropic engagement has been mixed, in part because of insufficient statistical power and methodological variation across studies. In this preregistered meta-analysis, we integrated data from 29 studies to estimate the associations between the Big Five personality traits with volunteering (N = 91,241, median age = 34 years, 61% female, 36% U.S. samples) and charitable giving (N = 3,559, median age = 39 years, 52% female, 40% U.S. samples). We further examined potential moderators, including the types of personality and philanthropic behavior measures used, gender, age, and sample region, to begin to explain the substantial heterogeneity of effect sizes across studies. Results indicated modest but robust correlations between the Big Five personality traits, volunteering, and charitable giving, with the largest effect sizes emerging for the links between extraversion and volunteering (r = .09, 95% CI [.05, .12]) and for agreeableness and charitable giving (r = .14, 95% CI [.04, .25]). There was little evidence for systematic moderator effects. We describe the theoretical implications of these results for future research, discuss practical applications, and highlight gaps in this body of literature. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).","PeriodicalId":16691,"journal":{"name":"Journal of personality and social psychology","volume":"108 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of personality and social psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000556","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Volunteering and charitable giving are core examples of traditional philanthropy that contribute to the health of democratic societies and individual well-being. Differences in people's willingness to engage in these behaviors hint at a role of psychological factors that foster or hinder these types of philanthropic engagement. Theory and empirical research suggest that broad personality traits may shape volunteering and charitable giving. However, existing evidence for links between specific traits and philanthropic engagement has been mixed, in part because of insufficient statistical power and methodological variation across studies. In this preregistered meta-analysis, we integrated data from 29 studies to estimate the associations between the Big Five personality traits with volunteering (N = 91,241, median age = 34 years, 61% female, 36% U.S. samples) and charitable giving (N = 3,559, median age = 39 years, 52% female, 40% U.S. samples). We further examined potential moderators, including the types of personality and philanthropic behavior measures used, gender, age, and sample region, to begin to explain the substantial heterogeneity of effect sizes across studies. Results indicated modest but robust correlations between the Big Five personality traits, volunteering, and charitable giving, with the largest effect sizes emerging for the links between extraversion and volunteering (r = .09, 95% CI [.05, .12]) and for agreeableness and charitable giving (r = .14, 95% CI [.04, .25]). There was little evidence for systematic moderator effects. We describe the theoretical implications of these results for future research, discuss practical applications, and highlight gaps in this body of literature. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
人格特质与传统慈善事业:系统回顾与元分析。
志愿服务和慈善捐赠是传统慈善事业的核心范例,有助于民主社会的健康和个人福祉。人们参与这些行为的意愿的差异暗示了心理因素的作用,促进或阻碍这些类型的慈善参与。理论和实证研究表明,广泛的人格特质可能会影响志愿服务和慈善捐赠。然而,关于特定特征与慈善参与之间联系的现有证据参差不齐,部分原因是统计能力不足,研究方法也存在差异。在这个预注册的荟萃分析中,我们整合了29项研究的数据,以估计五大人格特征与志愿服务(N = 91241,中位年龄= 34岁,61%的女性,36%的美国样本)和慈善捐赠(N = 3559,中位年龄= 39岁,52%的女性,40%的美国样本)之间的关系。我们进一步研究了潜在的调节因子,包括使用的人格类型和慈善行为测量、性别、年龄和样本区域,以开始解释研究中效应大小的实质性异质性。结果表明,五大人格特质、志愿服务和慈善捐赠之间存在适度但显著的相关性,其中外向性和志愿服务之间的关联效应最大(r = 0.09, 95% CI)。05, .12]),友善和慈善捐赠(r = .14, 95% CI[。04, 0。25)几乎没有证据表明存在系统性调节效应。我们描述了这些结果对未来研究的理论意义,讨论了实际应用,并强调了这一文献的空白。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
3.90%
发文量
250
期刊介绍: Journal of personality and social psychology publishes original papers in all areas of personality and social psychology and emphasizes empirical reports, but may include specialized theoretical, methodological, and review papers.Journal of personality and social psychology is divided into three independently edited sections. Attitudes and Social Cognition addresses all aspects of psychology (e.g., attitudes, cognition, emotion, motivation) that take place in significant micro- and macrolevel social contexts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信