The Effect of Cue Frequency, Modality and Rhythmicity on Finger Tapping Behaviour and Movement-Related Cortical Activity

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Janne J. A. Heijs, Silvana Huertas-Penen, Marc M. van Wanrooij, Bettina C. Schwab, Richard J. A. van Wezel, Tjitske Heida
{"title":"The Effect of Cue Frequency, Modality and Rhythmicity on Finger Tapping Behaviour and Movement-Related Cortical Activity","authors":"Janne J. A. Heijs,&nbsp;Silvana Huertas-Penen,&nbsp;Marc M. van Wanrooij,&nbsp;Bettina C. Schwab,&nbsp;Richard J. A. van Wezel,&nbsp;Tjitske Heida","doi":"10.1111/ejn.70112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Sensorimotor synchronization (SMS) involves the coordination of movements with rhythmic sensory cues. While cue characteristics influence SMS behaviour and neural pathways, their impact on cortical activity beyond motor areas is less understood. This exploratory EEG study examined how various cue characteristics, including cue frequency, modality and rhythmicity, influence behaviour and movement-related cortical activity in (non-)motor areas during SMS. Seventeen healthy participants performed finger tapping with cues varying in frequency (slow: 1 Hz, fast: 3.2 Hz), modality (visual, auditory) and rhythmicity (isorhythmic, polyrhythmic). SMS behaviour and movement-related beta power were evaluated. Key findings include the following: (1) Increasing cue frequency, and therefore movement speed, reduced tap accuracy, especially with visual cues. Slow cues induced strong beta suppression followed by beta rebound after the tap in the contralateral sensorimotor cortex, while fast cues induced a weaker but sustained beta suppression. (2) Auditory cues enabled more accurate tap behaviour and induced stronger beta suppression in the contralateral premotor cortex compared to visual cues. (3) Polyrhythmic auditory cues delayed taps compared to isorhythmic cues, although tap accuracy was similar. Isorhythmic cues enhanced frontoparietal beta power, whereas polyrhythmic cues showed widespread right-hemispheric beta suppression. Findings suggest discrete and continuous movement processing with slow and fast cues, respectively. Auditory cues offer more sensory guidance, especially at higher frequencies. Endogenous, top-down control with isorhythmic cues may switch towards stimulus-driven, bottom-up control with auditory polyrhythmic cues. Overall, our findings highlight how cue characteristics shape motor behaviour and neural processes, suggesting distinct movement control strategies depending on frequency, modality and rhythmicity.</p>","PeriodicalId":11993,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Neuroscience","volume":"61 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ejn.70112","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ejn.70112","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sensorimotor synchronization (SMS) involves the coordination of movements with rhythmic sensory cues. While cue characteristics influence SMS behaviour and neural pathways, their impact on cortical activity beyond motor areas is less understood. This exploratory EEG study examined how various cue characteristics, including cue frequency, modality and rhythmicity, influence behaviour and movement-related cortical activity in (non-)motor areas during SMS. Seventeen healthy participants performed finger tapping with cues varying in frequency (slow: 1 Hz, fast: 3.2 Hz), modality (visual, auditory) and rhythmicity (isorhythmic, polyrhythmic). SMS behaviour and movement-related beta power were evaluated. Key findings include the following: (1) Increasing cue frequency, and therefore movement speed, reduced tap accuracy, especially with visual cues. Slow cues induced strong beta suppression followed by beta rebound after the tap in the contralateral sensorimotor cortex, while fast cues induced a weaker but sustained beta suppression. (2) Auditory cues enabled more accurate tap behaviour and induced stronger beta suppression in the contralateral premotor cortex compared to visual cues. (3) Polyrhythmic auditory cues delayed taps compared to isorhythmic cues, although tap accuracy was similar. Isorhythmic cues enhanced frontoparietal beta power, whereas polyrhythmic cues showed widespread right-hemispheric beta suppression. Findings suggest discrete and continuous movement processing with slow and fast cues, respectively. Auditory cues offer more sensory guidance, especially at higher frequencies. Endogenous, top-down control with isorhythmic cues may switch towards stimulus-driven, bottom-up control with auditory polyrhythmic cues. Overall, our findings highlight how cue characteristics shape motor behaviour and neural processes, suggesting distinct movement control strategies depending on frequency, modality and rhythmicity.

Abstract Image

提示频率、情态和节奏对手指敲击行为和运动相关皮层活动的影响
感觉运动同步(SMS)涉及有节奏的感觉线索的运动协调。虽然线索特征影响SMS行为和神经通路,但它们对运动区域以外的皮层活动的影响尚不清楚。这项探索性脑电图研究考察了各种线索特征,包括线索频率、模式和节奏,如何影响SMS期间(非)运动区域的行为和运动相关皮层活动。17名健康的参与者在不同的频率(慢:1赫兹,快:3.2赫兹)、模式(视觉、听觉)和节奏(等节奏、多节奏)的提示下进行手指敲击。评估SMS行为和运动相关的beta功率。主要发现如下:(1)提示频率增加,从而导致运动速度加快,敲击精度降低,尤其是视觉提示。在对侧感觉运动皮层,慢信号诱发强烈的β抑制,并在轻拍后反弹,而快信号诱发较弱但持续的β抑制。(2)与视觉线索相比,听觉线索能使轻拍行为更准确,对侧运动前皮层β抑制更强。(3)与等节奏线索相比,多节奏听觉线索延迟敲击,但敲击准确率相似。等节奏信号增强额顶叶β能量,而多节奏信号则显示广泛的右半球β抑制。研究结果表明,在慢速线索和快速线索下,运动加工分别是离散的和连续的。听觉线索提供了更多的感官引导,尤其是在更高的频率下。内源性的、自上而下的等节奏信号控制可能会转变为刺激驱动的、自下而上的听觉多节奏信号控制。总的来说,我们的发现强调了线索特征如何塑造运动行为和神经过程,提出了不同的运动控制策略,这取决于频率、模式和节奏。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of Neuroscience
European Journal of Neuroscience 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
5.90%
发文量
305
审稿时长
3.5 months
期刊介绍: EJN is the journal of FENS and supports the international neuroscientific community by publishing original high quality research articles and reviews in all fields of neuroscience. In addition, to engage with issues that are of interest to the science community, we also publish Editorials, Meetings Reports and Neuro-Opinions on topics that are of current interest in the fields of neuroscience research and training in science. We have recently established a series of ‘Profiles of Women in Neuroscience’. Our goal is to provide a vehicle for publications that further the understanding of the structure and function of the nervous system in both health and disease and to provide a vehicle to engage the neuroscience community. As the official journal of FENS, profits from the journal are re-invested in the neuroscientific community through the activities of FENS.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信