{"title":"Hurdle Models in Psychology—A Practical Guide for Inflated Data","authors":"Renaud Mabire-Yon","doi":"10.1002/ijop.70042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>In psychological research, variables often exhibit point-mass inflation—for example, many zero responses or other boundary lumps—that defy standard regression techniques. Hurdle models address this challenge by separating the zero-generating process from the distribution of nonzero (or non-boundary) observations, thereby allowing for more accurate modelling of behaviour and outcomes. In this paper, I introduce the conceptual basis of Hurdle models and demonstrate how they can be applied to count data as well as other types of data (e.g., continuous variables with excess zeros). Using a step-by-step tutorial in R, I illustrate how the two-part hurdle structure—consisting of a binary component for point-mass observations and a truncated distribution for positive (or above-threshold) values—provides nuanced insights that simpler models often miss. To illustrate this approach, I walk through a fictional dataset examining home-based HIV testing among men who have sex with men, highlighting the Hurdle model's ability to simultaneously handle overdispersion and excess zeros. Emphasising iterative model evaluation, goodness-of-fit checks and a series of practical recommendations, this paper aims to equip psychologists with a robust analytical framework that promotes deeper, theory-aligned interpretations of data—ultimately fostering innovative research in diverse areas of psychological science.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48146,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Psychology","volume":"60 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ijop.70042","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In psychological research, variables often exhibit point-mass inflation—for example, many zero responses or other boundary lumps—that defy standard regression techniques. Hurdle models address this challenge by separating the zero-generating process from the distribution of nonzero (or non-boundary) observations, thereby allowing for more accurate modelling of behaviour and outcomes. In this paper, I introduce the conceptual basis of Hurdle models and demonstrate how they can be applied to count data as well as other types of data (e.g., continuous variables with excess zeros). Using a step-by-step tutorial in R, I illustrate how the two-part hurdle structure—consisting of a binary component for point-mass observations and a truncated distribution for positive (or above-threshold) values—provides nuanced insights that simpler models often miss. To illustrate this approach, I walk through a fictional dataset examining home-based HIV testing among men who have sex with men, highlighting the Hurdle model's ability to simultaneously handle overdispersion and excess zeros. Emphasising iterative model evaluation, goodness-of-fit checks and a series of practical recommendations, this paper aims to equip psychologists with a robust analytical framework that promotes deeper, theory-aligned interpretations of data—ultimately fostering innovative research in diverse areas of psychological science.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Psychology (IJP) is the journal of the International Union of Psychological Science (IUPsyS) and is published under the auspices of the Union. IJP seeks to support the IUPsyS in fostering the development of international psychological science. It aims to strengthen the dialog within psychology around the world and to facilitate communication among different areas of psychology and among psychologists from different cultural backgrounds. IJP is the outlet for empirical basic and applied studies and for reviews that either (a) incorporate perspectives from different areas or domains within psychology or across different disciplines, (b) test the culture-dependent validity of psychological theories, or (c) integrate literature from different regions in the world.