Immunophenotypic Profiling of Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia: Insights From a Large Cohort

IF 1.5 Q4 ONCOLOGY
Cancer reports Pub Date : 2025-04-19 DOI:10.1002/cnr2.70198
Supattra Kankhaw, Weerapat Owattanapanich, Orathai Promsuwicha, Thanyakan Thong-ou, Theera Ruchutrakool, Archrob Khuhapinant, Karan Paisooksantivatana, Smith Kungwankiattichai
{"title":"Immunophenotypic Profiling of Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia: Insights From a Large Cohort","authors":"Supattra Kankhaw,&nbsp;Weerapat Owattanapanich,&nbsp;Orathai Promsuwicha,&nbsp;Thanyakan Thong-ou,&nbsp;Theera Ruchutrakool,&nbsp;Archrob Khuhapinant,&nbsp;Karan Paisooksantivatana,&nbsp;Smith Kungwankiattichai","doi":"10.1002/cnr2.70198","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) is a highly aggressive disease that requires early initial therapy. Rapid diagnosis by flow cytometry remains the mainstay of initial diagnosis. However, the complexity of its immunochemistry has led to diagnostic uncertainty.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods and Results</h3>\n \n <p>We comprehensively reviewed 2124 AML patients, with 170 classified as APL. In the univariate analysis, HLA-DR, CD34, CD56, CD11b, and CD11c were predominantly positive in the non-APL group compared to the APL group, while MPO and CD33 were significantly positive in the APL group. In the multivariate analysis, MPO was identified as a significantly higher positive marker in APL patients, while HLA-DR, CD34, and CD56 predicted non-APL patients. The typical immunophenotype of APL, including MPO+/HLA-DR-/CD34- and CD117+, provided a sensitivity of 51.4%, a specificity of 98.0%, a positive predictive value of 65.8%, and a negative predictive value of 96.5%. By utilizing the decision tree methodology, HLA-DR, MPO, and CD34 emerged as pivotal indicators for APL diagnosis within this model. Notably, HLA-DR took precedence, followed by MPO and CD34. Ultimately, a predictive equation for APL diagnosis was proposed to simplify the diagnosis of APL by flow cytometry using the positivity of HLA-DR, MPO, and CD34 as reference points.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>This study underscores the role of immunophenotyping as a rapid and complementary tool to molecular diagnostics, aiding in the preliminary identification of probable APL cases and facilitating timely initiation of therapy.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":9440,"journal":{"name":"Cancer reports","volume":"8 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cnr2.70198","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cnr2.70198","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) is a highly aggressive disease that requires early initial therapy. Rapid diagnosis by flow cytometry remains the mainstay of initial diagnosis. However, the complexity of its immunochemistry has led to diagnostic uncertainty.

Methods and Results

We comprehensively reviewed 2124 AML patients, with 170 classified as APL. In the univariate analysis, HLA-DR, CD34, CD56, CD11b, and CD11c were predominantly positive in the non-APL group compared to the APL group, while MPO and CD33 were significantly positive in the APL group. In the multivariate analysis, MPO was identified as a significantly higher positive marker in APL patients, while HLA-DR, CD34, and CD56 predicted non-APL patients. The typical immunophenotype of APL, including MPO+/HLA-DR-/CD34- and CD117+, provided a sensitivity of 51.4%, a specificity of 98.0%, a positive predictive value of 65.8%, and a negative predictive value of 96.5%. By utilizing the decision tree methodology, HLA-DR, MPO, and CD34 emerged as pivotal indicators for APL diagnosis within this model. Notably, HLA-DR took precedence, followed by MPO and CD34. Ultimately, a predictive equation for APL diagnosis was proposed to simplify the diagnosis of APL by flow cytometry using the positivity of HLA-DR, MPO, and CD34 as reference points.

Conclusion

This study underscores the role of immunophenotyping as a rapid and complementary tool to molecular diagnostics, aiding in the preliminary identification of probable APL cases and facilitating timely initiation of therapy.

Abstract Image

背景 急性早幼粒细胞白血病(APL)是一种侵袭性很强的疾病,需要尽早进行初始治疗。流式细胞术的快速诊断仍是初步诊断的主要方法。然而,其免疫化学的复杂性导致了诊断的不确定性。 方法和结果 我们对 2124 例急性髓细胞白血病患者进行了全面检查,其中 170 例被归类为急性髓细胞白血病。在单变量分析中,与 APL 组相比,非 APL 组的 HLA-DR、CD34、CD56、CD11b 和 CD11c 主要呈阳性,而 APL 组的 MPO 和 CD33 呈显著阳性。在多变量分析中,MPO 被确定为 APL 患者中明显较高的阳性标记物,而 HLA-DR、CD34 和 CD56 则预测非 APL 患者。APL 的典型免疫表型包括 MPO+/HLA-DR-/CD34-和 CD117+,其敏感性为 51.4%,特异性为 98.0%,阳性预测值为 65.8%,阴性预测值为 96.5%。通过使用决策树方法,HLA-DR、MPO 和 CD34 成为该模型中诊断 APL 的关键指标。值得注意的是,HLA-DR 优先,MPO 和 CD34 次之。最终,研究人员提出了 APL 诊断的预测方程,以 HLA-DR、MPO 和 CD34 的阳性率为参考点,简化了流式细胞术对 APL 的诊断。 结论 本研究强调了免疫分型作为分子诊断快速补充工具的作用,有助于初步确定可能的 APL 病例,并促进及时开始治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cancer reports
Cancer reports Medicine-Oncology
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
5.90%
发文量
160
审稿时长
17 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信