Can the names of black cultural icons save the neighborhood: Relating street names to property values and neighborhood racial composition change in Harlem, New York City
{"title":"Can the names of black cultural icons save the neighborhood: Relating street names to property values and neighborhood racial composition change in Harlem, New York City","authors":"Lindiwe Rennert , Sonia Torres Rodríguez , Katherine Elder","doi":"10.1016/j.cities.2025.106011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Gentrification-related concerns are prevalent across much of the US. In many metropolitan areas, housing unaffordability is high, and changes in neighborhood character associated with dispossession and cultural removal of communities of color are not uncommon. These conditions contribute to the need for expanded understanding of space-claiming and place-guarding strategies relevant to race and socioeconomic factors. Answering this call, this study uses street names to quantitatively describe the ways that racialized values and sentiments get absorbed into the housing market and shape neighborhood demographic composition. Using a hedonic pricing model – looking at the gentrifying neighborhood of Harlem in NYC between 2000 and 2020 – this work finds that properties situated on streets named after Black cultural icons experience 13.8 % lower sale prices than otherwise comparable properties on non-Black named streets. This suggests that naming streets after Black cultural icons may help dampen upward pressure on housing costs, contributing to affordability. Specific to demographic change, however, findings reveal that areas surrounding streets named after Black icons do not experience higher shares of Black population retention over time than do other parts of the neighborhood. This work is relevant to advocates and activities, planners and policymakers, interested in advancing housing justice.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48405,"journal":{"name":"Cities","volume":"163 ","pages":"Article 106011"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cities","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264275125003117","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"URBAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Gentrification-related concerns are prevalent across much of the US. In many metropolitan areas, housing unaffordability is high, and changes in neighborhood character associated with dispossession and cultural removal of communities of color are not uncommon. These conditions contribute to the need for expanded understanding of space-claiming and place-guarding strategies relevant to race and socioeconomic factors. Answering this call, this study uses street names to quantitatively describe the ways that racialized values and sentiments get absorbed into the housing market and shape neighborhood demographic composition. Using a hedonic pricing model – looking at the gentrifying neighborhood of Harlem in NYC between 2000 and 2020 – this work finds that properties situated on streets named after Black cultural icons experience 13.8 % lower sale prices than otherwise comparable properties on non-Black named streets. This suggests that naming streets after Black cultural icons may help dampen upward pressure on housing costs, contributing to affordability. Specific to demographic change, however, findings reveal that areas surrounding streets named after Black icons do not experience higher shares of Black population retention over time than do other parts of the neighborhood. This work is relevant to advocates and activities, planners and policymakers, interested in advancing housing justice.
期刊介绍:
Cities offers a comprehensive range of articles on all aspects of urban policy. It provides an international and interdisciplinary platform for the exchange of ideas and information between urban planners and policy makers from national and local government, non-government organizations, academia and consultancy. The primary aims of the journal are to analyse and assess past and present urban development and management as a reflection of effective, ineffective and non-existent planning policies; and the promotion of the implementation of appropriate urban policies in both the developed and the developing world.