Stromal cell-based injection therapies for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis: A systematic review of level I randomized controlled trials

Jaydeep Dhillon , James A. Maguire , Matthew J. Kraeutler
{"title":"Stromal cell-based injection therapies for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis: A systematic review of level I randomized controlled trials","authors":"Jaydeep Dhillon ,&nbsp;James A. Maguire ,&nbsp;Matthew J. Kraeutler","doi":"10.1016/j.ocarto.2025.100608","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To systematically review randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to compare clinical outcomes of stromal cell-based injection therapies versus other non-operative treatment modalities for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis (OA).</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>A systematic review was performed by searching PubMed, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE to locate RCTs, published since 2019, comparing stromal cell-based injection therapies versus other non-operative modalities for the treatment of knee OA. The search terms used were: <em>knee AND osteoarthritis AND injection AND randomized</em>.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Seventeen studies (all Level I evidence) were included in this review with 972 patients undergoing treatment with stromal cell-based therapy (Intervention Group) and 651 patients in the control group (Control Group). Among the 17 studies, 7 used autologous adipose-derived mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) (ADMSCs), 2 studies used allogeneic ADMSCs, 4 used autologous bone marrow-derived MSCs (BMMSCs), 1 used allogeneic BMMSCs, 1 used allogeneic placental MSCs, 1 used umbilical cord-derived MSCs (UCMSCs), and 1 study used autologous ADMSCs, BMMSCs, or allogeneic UCMSCs. All but 3 studies reported significantly better clinical or radiological outcomes in the Intervention Group at final follow-up. A total of 5 and 3 studies reported adverse events occurring in the Intervention and the Control groups, respectively, but they were all self-limiting.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Patients undergoing treatment of knee OA with MSCs might be expected to experience improvements in clinical and radiological outcomes in comparison to other non-operative modalities. Additional studies with mid-to long-term outcomes are needed to better determine the efficacy and safety of MSCs for the treatment of knee OA.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74377,"journal":{"name":"Osteoarthritis and cartilage open","volume":"7 2","pages":"Article 100608"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Osteoarthritis and cartilage open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2665913125000445","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To systematically review randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to compare clinical outcomes of stromal cell-based injection therapies versus other non-operative treatment modalities for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis (OA).

Method

A systematic review was performed by searching PubMed, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE to locate RCTs, published since 2019, comparing stromal cell-based injection therapies versus other non-operative modalities for the treatment of knee OA. The search terms used were: knee AND osteoarthritis AND injection AND randomized.

Results

Seventeen studies (all Level I evidence) were included in this review with 972 patients undergoing treatment with stromal cell-based therapy (Intervention Group) and 651 patients in the control group (Control Group). Among the 17 studies, 7 used autologous adipose-derived mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) (ADMSCs), 2 studies used allogeneic ADMSCs, 4 used autologous bone marrow-derived MSCs (BMMSCs), 1 used allogeneic BMMSCs, 1 used allogeneic placental MSCs, 1 used umbilical cord-derived MSCs (UCMSCs), and 1 study used autologous ADMSCs, BMMSCs, or allogeneic UCMSCs. All but 3 studies reported significantly better clinical or radiological outcomes in the Intervention Group at final follow-up. A total of 5 and 3 studies reported adverse events occurring in the Intervention and the Control groups, respectively, but they were all self-limiting.

Conclusions

Patients undergoing treatment of knee OA with MSCs might be expected to experience improvements in clinical and radiological outcomes in comparison to other non-operative modalities. Additional studies with mid-to long-term outcomes are needed to better determine the efficacy and safety of MSCs for the treatment of knee OA.
基于基质细胞的注射疗法治疗膝骨关节炎:一项I级随机对照试验的系统综述
目的系统回顾随机对照试验(rct),比较基质细胞注射疗法与其他非手术治疗方式治疗膝关节骨性关节炎(OA)的临床结果。方法通过检索PubMed、Cochrane Library和EMBASE,对2019年以来发表的rct进行系统评价,比较基质细胞注射疗法与其他非手术方式治疗膝关节OA的疗效。搜索词为:膝关节和骨关节炎、注射和随机化。结果17项研究(均为一级证据)纳入本综述,972例患者接受基质细胞为基础的治疗(干预组),651例患者为对照组(对照组)。在这17项研究中,7项研究使用了自体脂肪来源的间充质间质细胞(ADMSCs), 2项研究使用了同种异体的间充质间质细胞,4项研究使用了自体骨髓来源的间充质间质细胞(BMMSCs), 1项研究使用了同种异体的胎盘间充质间质细胞,1项研究使用了脐带来源的间充质间质细胞(UCMSCs), 1项研究使用了自体脂肪来源的间充质间质细胞、BMMSCs或同种异体的UCMSCs。除3项研究外,干预组在最后随访时的临床或放射学结果均有显著改善。干预组和对照组分别有5项和3项研究报告了不良事件,但它们都是自限性的。结论:与其他非手术方式相比,接受MSCs治疗的膝关节OA患者的临床和影像学结果可能会有所改善。为了更好地确定MSCs治疗膝关节OA的有效性和安全性,还需要进一步的中长期结果研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Osteoarthritis and cartilage open
Osteoarthritis and cartilage open Orthopedics, Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信