Jaydeep Dhillon , James A. Maguire , Matthew J. Kraeutler
{"title":"Stromal cell-based injection therapies for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis: A systematic review of level I randomized controlled trials","authors":"Jaydeep Dhillon , James A. Maguire , Matthew J. Kraeutler","doi":"10.1016/j.ocarto.2025.100608","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To systematically review randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to compare clinical outcomes of stromal cell-based injection therapies versus other non-operative treatment modalities for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis (OA).</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>A systematic review was performed by searching PubMed, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE to locate RCTs, published since 2019, comparing stromal cell-based injection therapies versus other non-operative modalities for the treatment of knee OA. The search terms used were: <em>knee AND osteoarthritis AND injection AND randomized</em>.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Seventeen studies (all Level I evidence) were included in this review with 972 patients undergoing treatment with stromal cell-based therapy (Intervention Group) and 651 patients in the control group (Control Group). Among the 17 studies, 7 used autologous adipose-derived mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) (ADMSCs), 2 studies used allogeneic ADMSCs, 4 used autologous bone marrow-derived MSCs (BMMSCs), 1 used allogeneic BMMSCs, 1 used allogeneic placental MSCs, 1 used umbilical cord-derived MSCs (UCMSCs), and 1 study used autologous ADMSCs, BMMSCs, or allogeneic UCMSCs. All but 3 studies reported significantly better clinical or radiological outcomes in the Intervention Group at final follow-up. A total of 5 and 3 studies reported adverse events occurring in the Intervention and the Control groups, respectively, but they were all self-limiting.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Patients undergoing treatment of knee OA with MSCs might be expected to experience improvements in clinical and radiological outcomes in comparison to other non-operative modalities. Additional studies with mid-to long-term outcomes are needed to better determine the efficacy and safety of MSCs for the treatment of knee OA.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74377,"journal":{"name":"Osteoarthritis and cartilage open","volume":"7 2","pages":"Article 100608"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Osteoarthritis and cartilage open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2665913125000445","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
To systematically review randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to compare clinical outcomes of stromal cell-based injection therapies versus other non-operative treatment modalities for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis (OA).
Method
A systematic review was performed by searching PubMed, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE to locate RCTs, published since 2019, comparing stromal cell-based injection therapies versus other non-operative modalities for the treatment of knee OA. The search terms used were: knee AND osteoarthritis AND injection AND randomized.
Results
Seventeen studies (all Level I evidence) were included in this review with 972 patients undergoing treatment with stromal cell-based therapy (Intervention Group) and 651 patients in the control group (Control Group). Among the 17 studies, 7 used autologous adipose-derived mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) (ADMSCs), 2 studies used allogeneic ADMSCs, 4 used autologous bone marrow-derived MSCs (BMMSCs), 1 used allogeneic BMMSCs, 1 used allogeneic placental MSCs, 1 used umbilical cord-derived MSCs (UCMSCs), and 1 study used autologous ADMSCs, BMMSCs, or allogeneic UCMSCs. All but 3 studies reported significantly better clinical or radiological outcomes in the Intervention Group at final follow-up. A total of 5 and 3 studies reported adverse events occurring in the Intervention and the Control groups, respectively, but they were all self-limiting.
Conclusions
Patients undergoing treatment of knee OA with MSCs might be expected to experience improvements in clinical and radiological outcomes in comparison to other non-operative modalities. Additional studies with mid-to long-term outcomes are needed to better determine the efficacy and safety of MSCs for the treatment of knee OA.