A comparative review of organ-on-a-chip technologies for micro- and nanoplastics versus other environmental toxicants

IF 10.7 1区 生物学 Q1 BIOPHYSICS
Safiyah Abdessalam , Trinity J. Hardy , Darya Pershina , Jeong-Yeol Yoon
{"title":"A comparative review of organ-on-a-chip technologies for micro- and nanoplastics versus other environmental toxicants","authors":"Safiyah Abdessalam ,&nbsp;Trinity J. Hardy ,&nbsp;Darya Pershina ,&nbsp;Jeong-Yeol Yoon","doi":"10.1016/j.bios.2025.117472","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In recent years, organ-on-a-chip (OOC) technology has emerged as a groundbreaking platform to simulate complex physiological processes. Concurrently, the global presence of micro and nano-plastics (MNPs) in the environment and their ingestion has raised concerns about their impact on human health, specifically organs such as the lungs, liver, kidneys, and blood vessels. There is an added concern about their ability to cross even the blood-brain barrier (BBB). While numerous papers have been published assessing various environmental toxicants with OOCs, those for MNPs are relatively small. To ascertain current trends in methodologies and catalog the types of toxicants explored, we have gathered and analyzed papers that used OOCs to assess various environmental toxicants' impacts on these organs. Various platforms assessing MNPs were analyzed and compared to those for other environmental toxicants. Our results show that few articles have been published that used OOCs to assess MNPs' toxicity to human organs. Specifically, certain organs, such as the heart and skin, have little representation in this collection. OOC-based evaluation methods for MNP's toxicity have many advantages over the current methods – <em>in vitro</em> tests with 2D human cell cultures and animal studies – including lower cost, faster results, and greater physiological relevance. This review summarizes the current OOC techniques for assessing environmental toxicants and laboratory methods for evaluating MNPs' toxicity to humans. A systematic comparison of these methods provides a deeper understanding of the current techniques and suggests the optimized use of OOCs for assessing MNPs' and other pollutants' toxicity.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":259,"journal":{"name":"Biosensors and Bioelectronics","volume":"282 ","pages":"Article 117472"},"PeriodicalIF":10.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biosensors and Bioelectronics","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S095656632500346X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In recent years, organ-on-a-chip (OOC) technology has emerged as a groundbreaking platform to simulate complex physiological processes. Concurrently, the global presence of micro and nano-plastics (MNPs) in the environment and their ingestion has raised concerns about their impact on human health, specifically organs such as the lungs, liver, kidneys, and blood vessels. There is an added concern about their ability to cross even the blood-brain barrier (BBB). While numerous papers have been published assessing various environmental toxicants with OOCs, those for MNPs are relatively small. To ascertain current trends in methodologies and catalog the types of toxicants explored, we have gathered and analyzed papers that used OOCs to assess various environmental toxicants' impacts on these organs. Various platforms assessing MNPs were analyzed and compared to those for other environmental toxicants. Our results show that few articles have been published that used OOCs to assess MNPs' toxicity to human organs. Specifically, certain organs, such as the heart and skin, have little representation in this collection. OOC-based evaluation methods for MNP's toxicity have many advantages over the current methods – in vitro tests with 2D human cell cultures and animal studies – including lower cost, faster results, and greater physiological relevance. This review summarizes the current OOC techniques for assessing environmental toxicants and laboratory methods for evaluating MNPs' toxicity to humans. A systematic comparison of these methods provides a deeper understanding of the current techniques and suggests the optimized use of OOCs for assessing MNPs' and other pollutants' toxicity.
针对微塑料和纳米塑料以及其他环境毒物的片上器官技术比较综述
近年来,器官芯片技术已成为模拟复杂生理过程的突破性平台。与此同时,全球环境中微和纳米塑料(MNPs)的存在及其摄入引起了人们对其对人体健康,特别是肺、肝、肾和血管等器官影响的担忧。还有一个额外的担忧是它们穿越血脑屏障(BBB)的能力。虽然已经发表了许多论文,对各种环境毒物的OOCs进行了评估,但对MNPs的评估相对较少。为了确定方法的当前趋势并对所探索的毒物类型进行分类,我们收集并分析了使用OOCs评估各种环境毒物对这些器官影响的论文。分析了评估MNPs的各种平台,并将其与其他环境毒物的平台进行了比较。我们的研究结果表明,很少有文章发表使用OOCs来评估MNPs对人体器官的毒性。具体来说,某些器官,如心脏和皮肤,在这个集合中几乎没有代表性。基于ooc的MNP毒性评估方法与目前的方法(2D人体细胞培养和动物研究的体外试验)相比有许多优点,包括成本更低、结果更快、生理相关性更强。本文综述了目前评估环境毒物的OOC技术和评估MNPs对人类毒性的实验室方法。对这些方法的系统比较可以加深对当前技术的理解,并建议优化使用OOCs来评估MNPs和其他污染物的毒性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biosensors and Bioelectronics
Biosensors and Bioelectronics 工程技术-电化学
CiteScore
20.80
自引率
7.10%
发文量
1006
审稿时长
29 days
期刊介绍: Biosensors & Bioelectronics, along with its open access companion journal Biosensors & Bioelectronics: X, is the leading international publication in the field of biosensors and bioelectronics. It covers research, design, development, and application of biosensors, which are analytical devices incorporating biological materials with physicochemical transducers. These devices, including sensors, DNA chips, electronic noses, and lab-on-a-chip, produce digital signals proportional to specific analytes. Examples include immunosensors and enzyme-based biosensors, applied in various fields such as medicine, environmental monitoring, and food industry. The journal also focuses on molecular and supramolecular structures for enhancing device performance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信