Investigating radiocarbon isotope anomalies in CO2 for CCS monitoring: Insights from the Aquistore project and the influence of coal mine spoils

IF 4.6 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS
Nadia Tarakki, David Risk
{"title":"Investigating radiocarbon isotope anomalies in CO2 for CCS monitoring: Insights from the Aquistore project and the influence of coal mine spoils","authors":"Nadia Tarakki,&nbsp;David Risk","doi":"10.1016/j.ijggc.2025.104378","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The radiocarbon isotope of CO<sub>2</sub> (Δ<sup>14</sup>CO<sub>2</sub>) is a valuable tool for investigating soil-respired CO<sub>2</sub> and identifying its sources. At Aquistore, a CCS project in Canada, Δ<sup>14</sup>CO<sub>2</sub> is incorporated into surface soil-gas geochemical MMV studies to demonstrate the absence of surface impacts from CO<sub>2</sub> injection. However, some monitoring locations consistently show negative Δ<sup>14</sup>CO<sub>2</sub> values (usually indicative of fossil CO<sub>2</sub>) that predate CO<sub>2</sub> injections, suggesting these anomalies are natural or linked to soil disturbances. This study investigates the origins of these anomalies. We first hypothesized that CO<sub>2</sub> venting from coal seams underlying parts of the monitoring grid could explain the negative values. A spatial correlation between negative Δ<sup>14</sup>CO<sub>2</sub> values, historic open-pit coal mines, and mine spoils supported this hypothesis. However, Δ<sup>14</sup>CO<sub>2</sub> analysis from a nearby farm (control site) with intact coal seams but no mine spoils showed modern-age signatures (6.8 ± 16 %), ruling out the venting hypothesis. Next, we tested whether microbial decomposition of weathered coal fragments was responsible. A soil survey revealed a strong correlation between coal fragment concentrations (1.85–40.64 % w/w) and Δ<sup>14</sup>CO<sub>2</sub> anomalies. Laboratory incubation experiments further supported this hypothesis, showing that dry soils with weathered coal fragments produced proportionately negative Δ<sup>14</sup>CO<sub>2</sub> values, likely due to microbial activity. These findings underscore the need for a more nuanced and site-specific approach to CCS monitoring. In geochemically complex sites like Aquistore, relying solely on Δ<sup>14</sup>CO<sub>2</sub> may be misleading, and alternative tracers should be considered to ensure accurate soil-gas anomaly interpretations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":334,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control","volume":"144 ","pages":"Article 104378"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1750583625000763","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The radiocarbon isotope of CO214CO2) is a valuable tool for investigating soil-respired CO2 and identifying its sources. At Aquistore, a CCS project in Canada, Δ14CO2 is incorporated into surface soil-gas geochemical MMV studies to demonstrate the absence of surface impacts from CO2 injection. However, some monitoring locations consistently show negative Δ14CO2 values (usually indicative of fossil CO2) that predate CO2 injections, suggesting these anomalies are natural or linked to soil disturbances. This study investigates the origins of these anomalies. We first hypothesized that CO2 venting from coal seams underlying parts of the monitoring grid could explain the negative values. A spatial correlation between negative Δ14CO2 values, historic open-pit coal mines, and mine spoils supported this hypothesis. However, Δ14CO2 analysis from a nearby farm (control site) with intact coal seams but no mine spoils showed modern-age signatures (6.8 ± 16 %), ruling out the venting hypothesis. Next, we tested whether microbial decomposition of weathered coal fragments was responsible. A soil survey revealed a strong correlation between coal fragment concentrations (1.85–40.64 % w/w) and Δ14CO2 anomalies. Laboratory incubation experiments further supported this hypothesis, showing that dry soils with weathered coal fragments produced proportionately negative Δ14CO2 values, likely due to microbial activity. These findings underscore the need for a more nuanced and site-specific approach to CCS monitoring. In geochemically complex sites like Aquistore, relying solely on Δ14CO2 may be misleading, and alternative tracers should be considered to ensure accurate soil-gas anomaly interpretations.

Abstract Image

研究二氧化碳中用于CCS监测的放射性碳同位素异常:来自aquestore项目的见解和煤矿破坏的影响
二氧化碳的放射性碳同位素(Δ14CO2)是研究土壤呼吸二氧化碳和确定其来源的宝贵工具。在加拿大aquisstore的CCS项目中,Δ14CO2被纳入地表土壤-气体地球化学MMV研究,以证明二氧化碳注入对地表没有影响。然而,一些监测地点持续显示负Δ14CO2值(通常表明化石二氧化碳),这些值早于二氧化碳注入,表明这些异常是自然的或与土壤扰动有关。本研究探讨了这些异常的成因。我们首先假设,监测网格下部煤层的二氧化碳排放可以解释负值。负Δ14CO2值、历史露天煤矿和矿山破坏之间的空间相关性支持了这一假设。然而,Δ14CO2对附近一个农场(对照地点)的分析显示,煤层完整,但没有矿井破坏,显示出现代特征(6.8±16%),排除了通风假说。接下来,我们测试了风化煤碎片的微生物分解是否负责。土壤调查结果显示,煤块浓度(1.85 ~ 40.64% w/w)与Δ14CO2异常具有较强的相关性。实验室孵化实验进一步支持了这一假设,表明含有风化煤碎片的干燥土壤的Δ14CO2值成比例为负,可能是由于微生物活动。这些发现强调需要一种更细致和具体的CCS监测方法。在像aqueststore这样地球化学复杂的地点,仅仅依靠Δ14CO2可能会产生误导,应该考虑其他示踪剂,以确保准确的土壤-天然气异常解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
10.30%
发文量
199
审稿时长
4.8 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control is a peer reviewed journal focusing on scientific and engineering developments in greenhouse gas control through capture and storage at large stationary emitters in the power sector and in other major resource, manufacturing and production industries. The Journal covers all greenhouse gas emissions within the power and industrial sectors, and comprises both technical and non-technical related literature in one volume. Original research, review and comments papers are included.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信