Determining people’s ease and difficulty of movement based on observed travel behavior

IF 3.5 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Diana Saadi, Karel Martens
{"title":"Determining people’s ease and difficulty of movement based on observed travel behavior","authors":"Diana Saadi, Karel Martens","doi":"10.1007/s11116-025-10604-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This paper presents an approach to use GPS-based travel behavior surveys to determine who is being served well and who is being served poorly by the transport system. We draw on the extensive literature on travel behavior, which has shown that people’s travel behavior is at least in part shaped by the travel barriers they experience. Starting from this basic insight, we define 17 parameters that may provide insight into a person’s relative ease of movement. These ease of movement parameters cover dimensions related to trip frequency and diversity (e.g., overall and in evening hours), transport mode use (e.g., as driver or passenger), travel speed (e.g., for public transport legs), distance (e.g., trip detour ratio), and effort (e.g., ratio between trip legs and out-of-home activities). No single parameter is sufficient to determine whether someone is served well or poorly by the transport system, as behaviors may be the result of choice as well as constraint. However, we argue that jointly the parameters are likely to differentiate well-served from poorly-served people. We apply our approach to data from six GPS-based travel behavior surveys conducted in Israel’s four main metropolitan areas (N = 62,981). We calculate z-scores for all ease of movement parameters, with negative values suggesting mobility problems and positive values relative ease of movement compared to the entire sample. We conduct four known-group analyses, comparing mean z-scores by level of access to a private motorized vehicle, age, gender, and disability. Results are systematically in line with expectations: population segments identified in the literature as experiencing (more severe levels of) transport disadvantage show systematically lower composite mobility scores. These outcomes are particularly striking, considering the short observation period of only one day per respondent. Taken together, these findings provide a first indication that revealed travel behavior patterns can be used to identify population segments poorly served by the transport system and thus to determine both success and failure of the existing transport system. While more research is needed, the approach also holds promise to determine the impacts of transport projects on people’s ease of movement.</p>","PeriodicalId":49419,"journal":{"name":"Transportation","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-025-10604-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper presents an approach to use GPS-based travel behavior surveys to determine who is being served well and who is being served poorly by the transport system. We draw on the extensive literature on travel behavior, which has shown that people’s travel behavior is at least in part shaped by the travel barriers they experience. Starting from this basic insight, we define 17 parameters that may provide insight into a person’s relative ease of movement. These ease of movement parameters cover dimensions related to trip frequency and diversity (e.g., overall and in evening hours), transport mode use (e.g., as driver or passenger), travel speed (e.g., for public transport legs), distance (e.g., trip detour ratio), and effort (e.g., ratio between trip legs and out-of-home activities). No single parameter is sufficient to determine whether someone is served well or poorly by the transport system, as behaviors may be the result of choice as well as constraint. However, we argue that jointly the parameters are likely to differentiate well-served from poorly-served people. We apply our approach to data from six GPS-based travel behavior surveys conducted in Israel’s four main metropolitan areas (N = 62,981). We calculate z-scores for all ease of movement parameters, with negative values suggesting mobility problems and positive values relative ease of movement compared to the entire sample. We conduct four known-group analyses, comparing mean z-scores by level of access to a private motorized vehicle, age, gender, and disability. Results are systematically in line with expectations: population segments identified in the literature as experiencing (more severe levels of) transport disadvantage show systematically lower composite mobility scores. These outcomes are particularly striking, considering the short observation period of only one day per respondent. Taken together, these findings provide a first indication that revealed travel behavior patterns can be used to identify population segments poorly served by the transport system and thus to determine both success and failure of the existing transport system. While more research is needed, the approach also holds promise to determine the impacts of transport projects on people’s ease of movement.

根据观察到的旅行行为,确定人们行动的容易程度和困难程度
本文提出了一种利用基于gps的出行行为调查来确定谁得到了交通系统的良好服务,谁得到了较差的服务的方法。我们借鉴了大量关于旅行行为的文献,这些文献表明,人们的旅行行为至少在一定程度上是由他们经历的旅行障碍塑造的。从这一基本认识出发,我们定义了17个参数,这些参数可以帮助我们了解一个人的相对运动容易程度。这些易移动参数涵盖了与出行频率和多样性相关的维度(例如,总体和夜间时间),交通方式使用(例如,作为司机或乘客),旅行速度(例如,公共交通路线),距离(例如,旅行绕道比率)和努力(例如,旅行路线和户外活动之间的比率)。没有一个单一的参数足以决定一个人是否被运输系统服务得很好或不好,因为行为可能是选择的结果,也可能是约束的结果。然而,我们认为,联合参数可能区分服务良好和服务不良的人。我们将我们的方法应用于在以色列四个主要大都市地区进行的六项基于gps的旅行行为调查的数据(N = 62,981)。我们计算所有易于移动参数的z分数,负值表明移动问题,正值与整个样本相比,相对易于移动。我们进行了四个已知组分析,比较了平均z-分数按私人机动车辆的获取程度,年龄,性别和残疾。结果系统地符合预期:在文献中确定的经历(更严重的水平)交通劣势的人口群体显示出系统地较低的综合流动性得分。考虑到每个受访者只有一天的短暂观察期,这些结果尤其引人注目。综上所述,这些发现首次表明,所揭示的旅行行为模式可用于确定运输系统服务不足的人口群体,从而确定现有运输系统的成功和失败。虽然还需要更多的研究,但这种方法也有望确定交通项目对人们出行便利性的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Transportation
Transportation 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
10.70
自引率
4.70%
发文量
94
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: In our first issue, published in 1972, we explained that this Journal is intended to promote the free and vigorous exchange of ideas and experience among the worldwide community actively concerned with transportation policy, planning and practice. That continues to be our mission, with a clear focus on topics concerned with research and practice in transportation policy and planning, around the world. These four words, policy and planning, research and practice are our key words. While we have a particular focus on transportation policy analysis and travel behaviour in the context of ground transportation, we willingly consider all good quality papers that are highly relevant to transportation policy, planning and practice with a clear focus on innovation, on extending the international pool of knowledge and understanding. Our interest is not only with transportation policies - and systems and services – but also with their social, economic and environmental impacts, However, papers about the application of established procedures to, or the development of plans or policies for, specific locations are unlikely to prove acceptable unless they report experience which will be of real benefit those working elsewhere. Papers concerned with the engineering, safety and operational management of transportation systems are outside our scope.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信