Sakes exist

IF 1.3 1区哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY

PHILOSOPHY AND PHENOMENOLOGICAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2025-04-17 DOI:10.1111/phpr.70012

Tristan Grøtvedt Haze

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Contemporary ontologists, almost unanimously, dismiss the idea that sakes (as in ‘I did it for her sake’) exist. Likewise with the kibosh, snooks, behalves, dints, and so on. In this essay, I argue that there is no good reason for this near consensus, I begin to make a case that sakes and the like do exist, and I consider what this means more broadly for ontology.

查看原文本刊更多论文

的缘故存在

当代本体论家几乎一致否定了“为了”（比如“我这样做是为了她”）的存在。同样的还有kibosh， snoks, behaves， dints等等。在这篇文章中，我认为没有很好的理由来达成这种近乎一致的共识，我开始提出一个案例，说明sakes和类似的东西确实存在，并且我考虑这对本体论更广泛的意义。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

PHILOSOPHY AND PHENOMENOLOGICAL RESEARCH PHILOSOPHY-

CiteScore

3.50

自引率

6.70%

发文量

期刊介绍： Philosophy and Phenomenological Research publishes articles in a wide range of areas including philosophy of mind, epistemology, ethics, metaphysics, and philosophical history of philosophy. No specific methodology or philosophical orientation is required for submissions.