A rock physics modelling approach for time-lapse monitoring and characterization of fluid–rock interactions in hydrocarbon reservoirs

IF 1.8 3区 地球科学 Q3 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS
Moumita Sengupta, Ranjana Ghosh
{"title":"A rock physics modelling approach for time-lapse monitoring and characterization of fluid–rock interactions in hydrocarbon reservoirs","authors":"Moumita Sengupta,&nbsp;Ranjana Ghosh","doi":"10.1111/1365-2478.13642","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>One of the research gaps is to understand the development of seismic characteristics of gas-saturated rock along with the change in rock properties because of chemical reactions. We suggest a method to explain the change in elastic properties brought on by CO<sub>2</sub> injection in a rock by capturing the physico-chemical interactions observed in the laboratory in a theory of rock physics. To explain the laboratory-measured physical characteristics and velocity of a dynamic rock–fluid system, we include a time-dependent component in the existing cemented-sand model. We demonstrate theoretically the rate of change of elastic moduli of the dry frame by incorporating the measured rate of change of cement due to chemical dissolution. We adapt the theory such that it can be applied to the field data and calibrate the theory using water-saturated well log data from the Ankleshwar field, an established oil field in the Cambay basin, western India. Theoretical time-lapse logs of velocity and density are then produced using the theory over a range of CO<sub>2</sub> saturations, assuming cementing material in grain contacts and geochemical interactions comparable to those observed in the laboratory rock. Then, using theoretical logs, corresponding time-lapse synthetic seismic data are produced for different saturation. These data clearly demonstrate that, for a uniform model, velocity decreases by up to 18% as CO<sub>2</sub> saturation increases from 0% to 20% (ignoring the chemical effect), and that, for a specific saturation, say 20%, chemical effects result in a 17% decrease in velocity from the present to the end of 60 years. However, for the patchy model, velocity decreases maximum by 14% and 16% due to varying saturation and chemical reaction. Moreover, for a particular saturation of CO<sub>2</sub>, say 20%, velocity differs by 16% for different types of models. This research contributes to making strategy for CO<sub>2</sub>-sequestration in a designated field.</p>","PeriodicalId":12793,"journal":{"name":"Geophysical Prospecting","volume":"73 4","pages":"994-1007"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geophysical Prospecting","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1365-2478.13642","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

One of the research gaps is to understand the development of seismic characteristics of gas-saturated rock along with the change in rock properties because of chemical reactions. We suggest a method to explain the change in elastic properties brought on by CO2 injection in a rock by capturing the physico-chemical interactions observed in the laboratory in a theory of rock physics. To explain the laboratory-measured physical characteristics and velocity of a dynamic rock–fluid system, we include a time-dependent component in the existing cemented-sand model. We demonstrate theoretically the rate of change of elastic moduli of the dry frame by incorporating the measured rate of change of cement due to chemical dissolution. We adapt the theory such that it can be applied to the field data and calibrate the theory using water-saturated well log data from the Ankleshwar field, an established oil field in the Cambay basin, western India. Theoretical time-lapse logs of velocity and density are then produced using the theory over a range of CO2 saturations, assuming cementing material in grain contacts and geochemical interactions comparable to those observed in the laboratory rock. Then, using theoretical logs, corresponding time-lapse synthetic seismic data are produced for different saturation. These data clearly demonstrate that, for a uniform model, velocity decreases by up to 18% as CO2 saturation increases from 0% to 20% (ignoring the chemical effect), and that, for a specific saturation, say 20%, chemical effects result in a 17% decrease in velocity from the present to the end of 60 years. However, for the patchy model, velocity decreases maximum by 14% and 16% due to varying saturation and chemical reaction. Moreover, for a particular saturation of CO2, say 20%, velocity differs by 16% for different types of models. This research contributes to making strategy for CO2-sequestration in a designated field.

一种用于油气藏流体-岩石相互作用时移监测和表征的岩石物理建模方法
了解含气岩石地震特征的发展以及化学反应对岩石性质的影响是目前研究的空白之一。我们提出了一种方法,通过捕获岩石物理理论中在实验室观察到的物理化学相互作用来解释岩石中CO2注入所带来的弹性特性变化。为了解释实验室测量的动态岩石-流体系统的物理特性和速度,我们在现有的水泥砂模型中加入了一个时间相关的成分。我们通过结合水泥因化学溶解而引起的测量变化率,从理论上证明了干框架弹性模量的变化率。我们对该理论进行了调整,使其可以应用于现场数据,并使用印度西部Cambay盆地的Ankleshwar油田的饱和水测井数据对该理论进行了校准。然后,在一定范围的二氧化碳饱和度下,假设颗粒接触中的胶结材料和地球化学相互作用与在实验室岩石中观察到的情况相当,利用该理论可以生成速度和密度的理论延时日志。然后利用理论测井曲线,得到不同饱和度下相应的时移合成地震资料。这些数据清楚地表明,对于一个统一的模型,当二氧化碳饱和度从0%增加到20%(忽略化学效应)时,速度会下降18%,而对于特定的饱和度,比如20%,从现在到60年结束,化学效应会导致速度下降17%。然而,对于斑块模型,由于饱和度和化学反应的变化,流速最大降低14%和16%。此外,对于特定的二氧化碳饱和度,比如20%,不同类型的模型的速度相差16%。该研究有助于制定特定领域的co2封存策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Geophysical Prospecting
Geophysical Prospecting 地学-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
11.50%
发文量
118
审稿时长
4.5 months
期刊介绍: Geophysical Prospecting publishes the best in primary research on the science of geophysics as it applies to the exploration, evaluation and extraction of earth resources. Drawing heavily on contributions from researchers in the oil and mineral exploration industries, the journal has a very practical slant. Although the journal provides a valuable forum for communication among workers in these fields, it is also ideally suited to researchers in academic geophysics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信