Thinking about Hope in the Care of Cancer Patients

IF 2.3 3区 哲学 Q1 ETHICS
Alan B. Astrow
{"title":"Thinking about Hope in the Care of Cancer Patients","authors":"Alan B. Astrow","doi":"10.1002/hast.4954","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><i>Medical science has delivered extraordinary advances during my forty-year career as a medical oncologist. But might the science's justified prestige unhelpfully diminish our respect for other needed forms for understanding the human experience? This is a critical issue for physicians, who may be present with patients at moments of profound existential challenge. By equating hope with scientific progress and limiting its own role to purveyor of the latest that science has on offer, the medical profession may unwittingly add to the burden on patients with advanced cancer. Humanistic understandings of hope drawn from philosophy, theology, and literature serve as essential—at their best, equally true—partners to the portrait offered by experimental science. Physicians, in their manner of interacting with patients, may serve as both messengers of and models for a deeper understanding of hope that fully embodies the significance of human life and sustains patients when they most need support</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":55073,"journal":{"name":"Hastings Center Report","volume":"55 2","pages":"3-5"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hastings Center Report","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hast.4954","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Medical science has delivered extraordinary advances during my forty-year career as a medical oncologist. But might the science's justified prestige unhelpfully diminish our respect for other needed forms for understanding the human experience? This is a critical issue for physicians, who may be present with patients at moments of profound existential challenge. By equating hope with scientific progress and limiting its own role to purveyor of the latest that science has on offer, the medical profession may unwittingly add to the burden on patients with advanced cancer. Humanistic understandings of hope drawn from philosophy, theology, and literature serve as essential—at their best, equally true—partners to the portrait offered by experimental science. Physicians, in their manner of interacting with patients, may serve as both messengers of and models for a deeper understanding of hope that fully embodies the significance of human life and sustains patients when they most need support.

对癌症患者护理中的希望的思考
在我40年的肿瘤医学生涯中,医学科学取得了非凡的进步。但是,科学的正当威望是否会无益地削弱我们对理解人类经验所需的其他形式的尊重?对于医生来说,这是一个关键问题,因为他们可能会在患者面临重大生存挑战的时刻出现在患者身边。医学界将希望等同于科学进步,并将自己的角色局限于科学提供的最新成果的传播者,这可能会在不知不觉中增加晚期癌症患者的负担。从哲学、神学和文学中得出的对希望的人文主义理解,是实验科学提供的肖像的必要的——在最好的情况下,也是同样真实的伙伴。医生在与患者互动的过程中,既是对希望的使者,也是对希望的典范。希望充分体现了人的生命意义,在患者最需要支持的时候给予支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Hastings Center Report
Hastings Center Report 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
3.00%
发文量
99
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Hastings Center Report explores ethical, legal, and social issues in medicine, health care, public health, and the life sciences. Six issues per year offer articles, essays, case studies of bioethical problems, columns on law and policy, caregivers’ stories, peer-reviewed scholarly articles, and book reviews. Authors come from an assortment of professions and academic disciplines and express a range of perspectives and political opinions. The Report’s readership includes physicians, nurses, scholars, administrators, social workers, health lawyers, and others.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信