Genome Engineering, Chemical Exposure, and the Germline: An Ethical Synthesis

IF 2.3 3区 哲学 Q1 ETHICS
Anne Le Goff, Hannah Landecker
{"title":"Genome Engineering, Chemical Exposure, and the Germline: An Ethical Synthesis","authors":"Anne Le Goff,&nbsp;Hannah Landecker","doi":"10.1002/hast.4977","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><i>Concerns about the human germline in the context of genome editing have been at the forefront of contemporary bioethics, with the clear recognition that the heritability associated with such intervention merits special moral consideration. In contrast, the question of moral responsibility for modifications of the germline genome that result from anthropogenic environmental toxicants has received little attention. Yet, whether the impact of human technological activity on enduring shifts in human heredity occurs via purposeful genetic modification or nondirected changes that undermine genome stability, the result is irreversible genetic change in future generations. This article argues that the robust ethical reflection developed by the bioethics community to address human heritable genome editing can be used as a resource to address understudied questions of moral responsibility for anthropogenic insults to the germline. Drawing on this bioethics work, the article outlines a future-oriented ethical framework for germline responsibility in a time of widespread concern about industrial chemicals and human futures</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":55073,"journal":{"name":"Hastings Center Report","volume":"55 2","pages":"39-51"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hastings Center Report","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hast.4977","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Concerns about the human germline in the context of genome editing have been at the forefront of contemporary bioethics, with the clear recognition that the heritability associated with such intervention merits special moral consideration. In contrast, the question of moral responsibility for modifications of the germline genome that result from anthropogenic environmental toxicants has received little attention. Yet, whether the impact of human technological activity on enduring shifts in human heredity occurs via purposeful genetic modification or nondirected changes that undermine genome stability, the result is irreversible genetic change in future generations. This article argues that the robust ethical reflection developed by the bioethics community to address human heritable genome editing can be used as a resource to address understudied questions of moral responsibility for anthropogenic insults to the germline. Drawing on this bioethics work, the article outlines a future-oriented ethical framework for germline responsibility in a time of widespread concern about industrial chemicals and human futures.

基因组工程,化学暴露,和生殖系:伦理综合
在基因组编辑的背景下,对人类生殖系的担忧一直处于当代生物伦理学的前沿,人们清楚地认识到,与这种干预相关的遗传性值得特别的道德考虑。相比之下,人为环境毒物引起的生殖系基因组修饰的道德责任问题却很少受到关注。然而,无论人类技术活动对人类遗传的持久变化的影响是通过有目的的基因改造还是通过破坏基因组稳定性的非定向变化发生的,其结果都是后代不可逆转的遗传变化。本文认为,生物伦理学社区为解决人类可遗传基因组编辑问题而开展的强有力的伦理反思,可以作为解决人为损害生殖系的道德责任问题的资源。根据这一生物伦理学工作,文章概述了在工业化学品和人类未来广泛关注的时代,生殖细胞责任面向未来的伦理框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Hastings Center Report
Hastings Center Report 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
3.00%
发文量
99
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Hastings Center Report explores ethical, legal, and social issues in medicine, health care, public health, and the life sciences. Six issues per year offer articles, essays, case studies of bioethical problems, columns on law and policy, caregivers’ stories, peer-reviewed scholarly articles, and book reviews. Authors come from an assortment of professions and academic disciplines and express a range of perspectives and political opinions. The Report’s readership includes physicians, nurses, scholars, administrators, social workers, health lawyers, and others.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信