Novel and simple qPCR system for the detection and quantification of the probiotic bacteria in food supplements

IF 2.9 3区 农林科学 Q2 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Petr Kralik, Marta Duskova, Martin Klanica, Radka Dziedzinska
{"title":"Novel and simple qPCR system for the detection and quantification of the probiotic bacteria in food supplements","authors":"Petr Kralik,&nbsp;Marta Duskova,&nbsp;Martin Klanica,&nbsp;Radka Dziedzinska","doi":"10.1007/s11694-025-03181-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The food supplements gain an attractivity among consumers due to their pronounced health benefits. There is no legal frame for probiotic food supplements and the only controllable aspect is the agreement of the declaration with the real composition. The culture methods and subsequent identification by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) suffer from many inconsistencies like a different growing rate of each microorganism to their close DNA relatedness and similar profile undistinguishable by MALDI-TOF MS. Despite their inability to assess viability, qPCR methods have become more popular due to their sensitivity, specificity and speed. This paper reports about 29 originally designed qPCR assays for the detection of the probiotic species present in food supplements. Moreover, an innovative procedure for the quantification of components in supplements without necessity to run calibration curve was introduced and validated. The whole process was tested on 35 commercially available food supplements. More than half of them did not meet the declaration of the manufacturer. It was also found out that the qPCR was too sensitive as it detected low numbers of non-declared species in all analyzed samples. Therefore, a cut-off value of Cq &gt; 30 had to be applied. The quantification of the individual probiotic species by qPCR showed a good agreement with the declaration of the manufacturers. The same was true for the total number of microorganisms with two exceptions. The developed qPCR assays provide a very simple and inexpensive tool for the detection and quantification of probiotic species in food supplements.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":631,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Food Measurement and Characterization","volume":"19 5","pages":"3288 - 3300"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11694-025-03181-1.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Food Measurement and Characterization","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11694-025-03181-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The food supplements gain an attractivity among consumers due to their pronounced health benefits. There is no legal frame for probiotic food supplements and the only controllable aspect is the agreement of the declaration with the real composition. The culture methods and subsequent identification by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) suffer from many inconsistencies like a different growing rate of each microorganism to their close DNA relatedness and similar profile undistinguishable by MALDI-TOF MS. Despite their inability to assess viability, qPCR methods have become more popular due to their sensitivity, specificity and speed. This paper reports about 29 originally designed qPCR assays for the detection of the probiotic species present in food supplements. Moreover, an innovative procedure for the quantification of components in supplements without necessity to run calibration curve was introduced and validated. The whole process was tested on 35 commercially available food supplements. More than half of them did not meet the declaration of the manufacturer. It was also found out that the qPCR was too sensitive as it detected low numbers of non-declared species in all analyzed samples. Therefore, a cut-off value of Cq > 30 had to be applied. The quantification of the individual probiotic species by qPCR showed a good agreement with the declaration of the manufacturers. The same was true for the total number of microorganisms with two exceptions. The developed qPCR assays provide a very simple and inexpensive tool for the detection and quantification of probiotic species in food supplements.

一种新型简便的qPCR系统用于食品补充剂中益生菌的检测和定量
食品补充剂因其明显的健康益处而受到消费者的青睐。益生菌食品补充剂没有法律框架,唯一可控的方面是声明与实际成分是否一致。基质辅助激光解吸/电离飞行时间质谱(MALDI-TOF MS)的培养方法和随后的鉴定存在许多不一致之处,例如每种微生物的生长速度不同,而它们的DNA相关性和相似的特征无法被MALDI-TOF MS区分。尽管qPCR方法无法评估生存能力,但由于其灵敏度、特异性和速度,qPCR方法越来越受欢迎。本文报道了29种原设计的qPCR检测食品补充剂中益生菌的方法。此外,还介绍并验证了一种无需运行校准曲线即可定量补充物中成分的创新方法。整个过程在35种市售食品补充剂上进行了测试。其中一半以上不符合制造商的声明。qPCR在所有分析样本中检测到的非申报物种数量较少,灵敏度过高。因此,必须采用Cq >; 30的临界值。利用qPCR对益生菌的种类进行定量分析,结果与生产厂家的申报结果吻合较好。微生物的总数也是如此,只有两个例外。所开发的qPCR方法为食品补充剂中益生菌种类的检测和定量提供了一种非常简单和廉价的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Food Measurement and Characterization
Journal of Food Measurement and Characterization Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Food Science
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
11.80%
发文量
425
期刊介绍: This interdisciplinary journal publishes new measurement results, characteristic properties, differentiating patterns, measurement methods and procedures for such purposes as food process innovation, product development, quality control, and safety assurance. The journal encompasses all topics related to food property measurement and characterization, including all types of measured properties of food and food materials, features and patterns, measurement principles and techniques, development and evaluation of technologies, novel uses and applications, and industrial implementation of systems and procedures.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信