Visuospatial impairment in dementia: a new index to improve the clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Francesca Santagata, Stefano F. Cappa, Roberto Presta, Caterina Burgio, Chiara Luppi, Massimiliano Massaia, Elisa Calvi, Patrizia D’Amelio
{"title":"Visuospatial impairment in dementia: a new index to improve the clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease","authors":"Francesca Santagata,&nbsp;Stefano F. Cappa,&nbsp;Roberto Presta,&nbsp;Caterina Burgio,&nbsp;Chiara Luppi,&nbsp;Massimiliano Massaia,&nbsp;Elisa Calvi,&nbsp;Patrizia D’Amelio","doi":"10.1007/s40520-025-03028-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The differential diagnosis between Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and other causes of dementia is essential but challenging. Therefore, there is an increasing need for early, reliable, and non-invasive tests to distinguish between different forms of dementia.</p><h3>Aims</h3><p>To determine whether neuropsychological tests assessing visuospatial function can improve confidence in the clinical diagnosis of AD.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>Retrospective observational single-center cohort study involving all patients consecutively referred to our outpatient clinic for cognitive disorders who underwent neuropsychological assessment between 2013 and 2018. In addition to demographic and functional variables, each patient underwent neuropsychological tests to assess cognitive performance, memory, and executive, language, and visuospatial ability, according to clinical protocols. The clinical diagnosis of cognitive disorders, based on standard diagnostic criteria, served as the gold standard. Accuracy measures of visuospatial tests to diagnose AD were calculated. Additionally, a new index derived from the sum of four items (Rey-Osterrieth figure copying, Copy of Drawings, Clock Drawing Test, and years of schooling) was tested (ReDCOOL).</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Of the 342 patients analyzed, 308 were diagnosed with dementia or mild cognitive impairment, including 60 with AD. AD patients exhibited the worst performance in visuospatial tests, and the utilization of the ReDCOOL index proved to be more dependable in identifying AD compared to other tests (AUROC 0.729, 95%CI 0.659–0.799; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001).</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The ReDCOOL index appears to increase confidence in the clinical diagnosis of AD compared to each of the visuospatial tests considered. Furthermore, this index is easily calculated and does not prolong the time needed for clinical evaluation, as it does not require a customized patient assessment.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7720,"journal":{"name":"Aging Clinical and Experimental Research","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s40520-025-03028-1.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aging Clinical and Experimental Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40520-025-03028-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The differential diagnosis between Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and other causes of dementia is essential but challenging. Therefore, there is an increasing need for early, reliable, and non-invasive tests to distinguish between different forms of dementia.

Aims

To determine whether neuropsychological tests assessing visuospatial function can improve confidence in the clinical diagnosis of AD.

Methods

Retrospective observational single-center cohort study involving all patients consecutively referred to our outpatient clinic for cognitive disorders who underwent neuropsychological assessment between 2013 and 2018. In addition to demographic and functional variables, each patient underwent neuropsychological tests to assess cognitive performance, memory, and executive, language, and visuospatial ability, according to clinical protocols. The clinical diagnosis of cognitive disorders, based on standard diagnostic criteria, served as the gold standard. Accuracy measures of visuospatial tests to diagnose AD were calculated. Additionally, a new index derived from the sum of four items (Rey-Osterrieth figure copying, Copy of Drawings, Clock Drawing Test, and years of schooling) was tested (ReDCOOL).

Results

Of the 342 patients analyzed, 308 were diagnosed with dementia or mild cognitive impairment, including 60 with AD. AD patients exhibited the worst performance in visuospatial tests, and the utilization of the ReDCOOL index proved to be more dependable in identifying AD compared to other tests (AUROC 0.729, 95%CI 0.659–0.799; p < 0.001).

Conclusion

The ReDCOOL index appears to increase confidence in the clinical diagnosis of AD compared to each of the visuospatial tests considered. Furthermore, this index is easily calculated and does not prolong the time needed for clinical evaluation, as it does not require a customized patient assessment.

痴呆的视觉空间损害:提高阿尔茨海默病临床诊断的新指标
阿尔茨海默病(AD)和其他原因的痴呆的鉴别诊断是必要的,但具有挑战性。因此,越来越需要早期、可靠和非侵入性的检测来区分不同形式的痴呆。目的探讨评估视觉空间功能的神经心理测试是否能提高阿尔茨海默病临床诊断的可信度。方法回顾性观察性单中心队列研究,纳入2013 - 2018年间连续转诊至我院门诊接受神经心理学评估的认知障碍患者。根据临床方案,除了人口统计学和功能变量外,每位患者还接受了神经心理学测试,以评估认知表现、记忆、执行、语言和视觉空间能力。认知障碍的临床诊断以标准诊断标准为基础,成为金标准。计算了视觉空间测试诊断AD的准确度。此外,还测试了一个由四项(Rey-Osterrieth数字复制、图纸复制、时钟绘制测试和学校教育年限)总和得出的新指数(ReDCOOL)。结果在分析的342例患者中,308例被诊断为痴呆或轻度认知障碍,其中60例患有AD。AD患者在视觉空间测试中表现最差,与其他测试相比,ReDCOOL指数的使用被证明在识别AD方面更可靠(AUROC 0.729, 95%CI 0.659-0.799;p < 0.001)。结论与其他视觉空间测试相比,ReDCOOL指数似乎增加了AD临床诊断的可信度。此外,该指标易于计算,不需要定制患者评估,因此不会延长临床评估所需的时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
5.00%
发文量
283
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Aging clinical and experimental research offers a multidisciplinary forum on the progressing field of gerontology and geriatrics. The areas covered by the journal include: biogerontology, neurosciences, epidemiology, clinical gerontology and geriatric assessment, social, economical and behavioral gerontology. “Aging clinical and experimental research” appears bimonthly and publishes review articles, original papers and case reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信