Socio-technical feasibility of coal transitions in India: Results from stakeholder interviews

IF 5.8 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS
Udayan Singh , Saritha Sudharmma Vishwanathan , Amit Garg , Ajay K. Singh , Srinath Haran Iyer
{"title":"Socio-technical feasibility of coal transitions in India: Results from stakeholder interviews","authors":"Udayan Singh ,&nbsp;Saritha Sudharmma Vishwanathan ,&nbsp;Amit Garg ,&nbsp;Ajay K. Singh ,&nbsp;Srinath Haran Iyer","doi":"10.1016/j.egycc.2025.100188","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Strategizing development-led energy transitions for India would need considerable stakeholder inputs for improved decision-making. While modeling exercises have largely been used for research and policymaking, an increasing need is felt to validate underlying assumptions and model findings based on views of important stakeholders. Particularly, for the coal sector, these stakeholders are present throughout the value chain: mining, end-use (power and industry), regulatory agencies, transport and advocacy. This paper summarizes the key findings of our interviews with <em>n</em> = 21 stakeholders across these sectors focusing on evolving coal use, underlying technologies and socio-technical features of this transition. Based on this exercise, interviewed experts largely believe that coal use would continue for the next two decades in the interest of energy security and energy affordability to the consumer. At the same time, they also acknowledged the reduced costs of solar, which makes it a key player in the analysis. We also notice an improved perception of carbon management technologies. Particularly, CO<sub>2</sub> utilization to produce methanol and urea are seen as potential winners as these approaches could facilitate lower imports of petroleum and natural gas products. Geologic CO<sub>2</sub> storage is still somewhat impeded by technical limitations and lack of global exemplars. Other approaches such as recovery of methane from gassy coal mines and biomass co-firing are seen as important but limited in potential. Most stakeholders also pointed to the need for averting job losses in the coal value-chain, which may not necessarily be made up by renewables.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72914,"journal":{"name":"Energy and climate change","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100188"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy and climate change","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666278725000157","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Strategizing development-led energy transitions for India would need considerable stakeholder inputs for improved decision-making. While modeling exercises have largely been used for research and policymaking, an increasing need is felt to validate underlying assumptions and model findings based on views of important stakeholders. Particularly, for the coal sector, these stakeholders are present throughout the value chain: mining, end-use (power and industry), regulatory agencies, transport and advocacy. This paper summarizes the key findings of our interviews with n = 21 stakeholders across these sectors focusing on evolving coal use, underlying technologies and socio-technical features of this transition. Based on this exercise, interviewed experts largely believe that coal use would continue for the next two decades in the interest of energy security and energy affordability to the consumer. At the same time, they also acknowledged the reduced costs of solar, which makes it a key player in the analysis. We also notice an improved perception of carbon management technologies. Particularly, CO2 utilization to produce methanol and urea are seen as potential winners as these approaches could facilitate lower imports of petroleum and natural gas products. Geologic CO2 storage is still somewhat impeded by technical limitations and lack of global exemplars. Other approaches such as recovery of methane from gassy coal mines and biomass co-firing are seen as important but limited in potential. Most stakeholders also pointed to the need for averting job losses in the coal value-chain, which may not necessarily be made up by renewables.
印度煤炭转型的社会技术可行性:利益相关者访谈的结果
为印度制定以发展为主导的能源转型战略需要大量利益相关者的投入,以改善决策。虽然建模练习主要用于研究和决策,但越来越需要根据重要利益相关者的观点来验证基本假设和模型结果。特别是对于煤炭行业,这些利益相关者存在于整个价值链中:采矿、最终用途(电力和工业)、监管机构、运输和宣传。本文总结了我们对这些行业的n = 21名利益相关者的访谈的主要发现,重点关注煤炭使用的演变、基础技术和转型的社会技术特征。基于这一调查,受访专家大多认为,为了能源安全和消费者的能源负担能力,煤炭的使用将在未来20年继续下去。与此同时,他们也承认太阳能的成本降低,这使其成为分析中的关键因素。我们还注意到对碳管理技术的认识有所提高。特别是,利用二氧化碳生产甲醇和尿素被视为潜在的赢家,因为这些方法可以促进减少石油和天然气产品的进口。由于技术限制和缺乏全球范例,地质二氧化碳储存仍然受到一定程度的阻碍。其他方法,如从瓦斯煤矿中回收甲烷和生物质共烧,被认为是重要的,但潜力有限。大多数利益相关者还指出,有必要避免煤炭价值链上的失业,而可再生能源不一定能弥补这一损失。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy and climate change
Energy and climate change Global and Planetary Change, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信