Analyzing resuscitation conference content through the lens of the chain of survival

IF 2.1 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Nino Fijačko , Sebastian Schnaubelt , Vinay M Nadkarni , Špela Metličar , Robert Greif
{"title":"Analyzing resuscitation conference content through the lens of the chain of survival","authors":"Nino Fijačko ,&nbsp;Sebastian Schnaubelt ,&nbsp;Vinay M Nadkarni ,&nbsp;Špela Metličar ,&nbsp;Robert Greif","doi":"10.1016/j.resplu.2025.100951","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Resuscitation science today often focuses on advanced topics such as extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation or targeted temperature management. However, the specific topics presented at resuscitation conferences have not been thoroughly analyzed. We thus analyzed resuscitation conferences abstracts using a chain of survival framework.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Two major resuscitation conferences (Resuscitation in Greece and Resuscitation Science Symposium in the USA) took place in the fall of 2024. We categorized all abstracts using chain of survival framework, analyzing authors’ countries by geography and income. Additionally, artificial intelligence, deep learning, and machine learning approaches for data analysis were examined.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>“Recognition and prevention” was the top category at both conferences, comprising 37% of topics at Resuscitation 2024 and 32% at Resuscitation Science Symposium 2024. “Early Call for Help”, “High-quality Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation”, and “Recovery and rehabilitation” were underrepresented, with each &lt;8%. At Resuscitation Science Symposium 2024, “Post-cardiac arrest care” (31%) and “Early defibrillation and advanced life support” (26%) were emphasized, compared to 21% each at Resuscitation 2024 for both chains. Resuscitation 2024 featured participants from 51 countries while Resuscitation Science Symposium 2024 included participants from 19 countries, predominantly high-income ones. At Resuscitation 2024, 54 abstracts, and at Resuscitation Science Symposium 2024, 47 abstracts used machine learning, each with one employing artificial intelligence. None used deep learning.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Conference abstracts aligned mainly with the early links of chain of survival and employing machine learning as a data analysis tool. Expanding participation from low-income countries could enhance inclusivity and contribute valuable perspectives to resuscitation science.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":94192,"journal":{"name":"Resuscitation plus","volume":"23 ","pages":"Article 100951"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resuscitation plus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666520425000888","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Resuscitation science today often focuses on advanced topics such as extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation or targeted temperature management. However, the specific topics presented at resuscitation conferences have not been thoroughly analyzed. We thus analyzed resuscitation conferences abstracts using a chain of survival framework.

Methods

Two major resuscitation conferences (Resuscitation in Greece and Resuscitation Science Symposium in the USA) took place in the fall of 2024. We categorized all abstracts using chain of survival framework, analyzing authors’ countries by geography and income. Additionally, artificial intelligence, deep learning, and machine learning approaches for data analysis were examined.

Results

“Recognition and prevention” was the top category at both conferences, comprising 37% of topics at Resuscitation 2024 and 32% at Resuscitation Science Symposium 2024. “Early Call for Help”, “High-quality Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation”, and “Recovery and rehabilitation” were underrepresented, with each <8%. At Resuscitation Science Symposium 2024, “Post-cardiac arrest care” (31%) and “Early defibrillation and advanced life support” (26%) were emphasized, compared to 21% each at Resuscitation 2024 for both chains. Resuscitation 2024 featured participants from 51 countries while Resuscitation Science Symposium 2024 included participants from 19 countries, predominantly high-income ones. At Resuscitation 2024, 54 abstracts, and at Resuscitation Science Symposium 2024, 47 abstracts used machine learning, each with one employing artificial intelligence. None used deep learning.

Conclusions

Conference abstracts aligned mainly with the early links of chain of survival and employing machine learning as a data analysis tool. Expanding participation from low-income countries could enhance inclusivity and contribute valuable perspectives to resuscitation science.
从生存链的角度分析复苏会议内容
今天的复苏科学往往集中在先进的主题,如体外心肺复苏或目标温度管理。然而,在复苏会议上提出的具体主题尚未得到彻底的分析。因此,我们使用生存链框架分析复苏会议摘要。方法在2024年秋季召开了两大复苏会议(希腊复苏会议和美国复苏科学研讨会)。我们使用生存链框架对所有摘要进行分类,并按地理和收入对作者所在国家进行分析。此外,研究了用于数据分析的人工智能、深度学习和机器学习方法。结果“识别和预防”在两届会议上都是最重要的类别,分别占2024年复苏科学研讨会的37%和32%。“早期呼救”、“高质量心肺复苏”和“恢复和康复”的代表性不足,各占8%。在2024年的复苏科学研讨会上,“心脏骤停后护理”(31%)和“早期除颤和高级生命支持”(26%)被强调,而在2024年的复苏科学研讨会上,这两个链各强调21%。2024复苏科学研讨会的参与者来自51个国家,而2024复苏科学研讨会的参与者来自19个国家,主要是高收入国家。在2024年的复苏科学研讨会上,有54篇摘要,在2024年的复苏科学研讨会上,有47篇摘要使用了机器学习,每一篇都使用了人工智能。没有人使用深度学习。会议摘要主要与生存链的早期环节保持一致,并采用机器学习作为数据分析工具。扩大低收入国家的参与可以增强包容性,并为复苏科学提供有价值的观点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Resuscitation plus
Resuscitation plus Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
52 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信