From entry to excellence: Exploring relationships between admission pathways, disciplinary areas of study, and EAL international undergraduate students’ academic success in New Zealand

IF 3.1 1区 文学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Xina Jin, Rachael Ruegg, Averil Coxhead
{"title":"From entry to excellence: Exploring relationships between admission pathways, disciplinary areas of study, and EAL international undergraduate students’ academic success in New Zealand","authors":"Xina Jin,&nbsp;Rachael Ruegg,&nbsp;Averil Coxhead","doi":"10.1016/j.jeap.2025.101517","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study aims to identify whether EAL international students’ academic success is related to their university entry pathways and disciplinary areas of study in an English-speaking context. Academic performance records, including Grade Point Average (GPA) scores and percentage of enrolled academic points achieved, of 511 English as an additional language (EAL) undergraduate students over a six-semester period of study were analysed at a university in New Zealand. The results indicated that students who commenced undergraduate studies by passing standardized English tests (e.g., IELTS) outperformed their counterparts in GPA, while those who completed an English for Academic Purposes (EAP) programme showed rapid academic adjustment after one semester of immersive study. Overall, students who were exempt from providing proof of English proficiency due to prior English-medium experience performed the lowest. Although no significant differences were found across disciplinary groups, students in science and engineering fields consistently performed better than their peers in both GPA and academic points achievement rate. Conversely, students in the architecture and design fields performed the lowest among all. The findings suggest that both university entry pathways and disciplinary areas are linked to the divergent academic performance of EAL students, with the relationship between entry pathways and their performance being more pronounced. The study suggests that, in addition to providing continuous academic support, it may be necessary to adjust admission requirements to ensure comparable learning outcomes among EAL international students.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47717,"journal":{"name":"Journal of English for Academic Purposes","volume":"75 ","pages":"Article 101517"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of English for Academic Purposes","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1475158525000487","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to identify whether EAL international students’ academic success is related to their university entry pathways and disciplinary areas of study in an English-speaking context. Academic performance records, including Grade Point Average (GPA) scores and percentage of enrolled academic points achieved, of 511 English as an additional language (EAL) undergraduate students over a six-semester period of study were analysed at a university in New Zealand. The results indicated that students who commenced undergraduate studies by passing standardized English tests (e.g., IELTS) outperformed their counterparts in GPA, while those who completed an English for Academic Purposes (EAP) programme showed rapid academic adjustment after one semester of immersive study. Overall, students who were exempt from providing proof of English proficiency due to prior English-medium experience performed the lowest. Although no significant differences were found across disciplinary groups, students in science and engineering fields consistently performed better than their peers in both GPA and academic points achievement rate. Conversely, students in the architecture and design fields performed the lowest among all. The findings suggest that both university entry pathways and disciplinary areas are linked to the divergent academic performance of EAL students, with the relationship between entry pathways and their performance being more pronounced. The study suggests that, in addition to providing continuous academic support, it may be necessary to adjust admission requirements to ensure comparable learning outcomes among EAL international students.
从入门到卓越:探索录取途径、学科领域和EAL国际本科生在新西兰的学业成功之间的关系
本研究旨在确定英语环境下EAL国际学生的学业成功是否与他们的大学入学途径和学习的学科领域有关。研究分析了新西兰一所大学511名英语作为附加语言(EAL)本科学生在六个学期的学习期间的学习成绩记录,包括平均绩点(GPA)分数和注册学术分数的百分比。结果表明,通过标准化英语考试(如雅思)开始本科学习的学生在GPA方面优于同龄人,而完成学术英语(EAP)课程的学生在一个学期的沉浸式学习后表现出快速的学术适应。总体而言,由于先前的英语媒介经验而免除提供英语水平证明的学生表现最低。尽管在学科组之间没有发现显著差异,但理工科学生在GPA和学业成绩方面的表现始终优于同龄人。相反,建筑和设计领域的学生在所有学生中表现最差。研究结果表明,大学入学途径和学科领域都与EAL学生的不同学习成绩有关,入学途径与他们的表现之间的关系更为明显。研究建议,除了提供持续的学术支持外,可能有必要调整入学要求,以确保EAL国际学生的学习成果具有可比性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
13.30%
发文量
81
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of English for Academic Purposes provides a forum for the dissemination of information and views which enables practitioners of and researchers in EAP to keep current with developments in their field and to contribute to its continued updating. JEAP publishes articles, book reviews, conference reports, and academic exchanges in the linguistic, sociolinguistic and psycholinguistic description of English as it occurs in the contexts of academic study and scholarly exchange itself.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信