Raw material criticality assessments as decision-making support for corporate circular economy strategies – A systematic review

IF 11.2 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Natalie Otterbach , Magnus Fröhling
{"title":"Raw material criticality assessments as decision-making support for corporate circular economy strategies – A systematic review","authors":"Natalie Otterbach ,&nbsp;Magnus Fröhling","doi":"10.1016/j.resconrec.2025.108299","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The European economy and its low-carbon transition relies on raw material deposits of few countries. Companies can enhance Europe's resilience and gain a strategic advantage by systematically mapping and actively managing their company-specific raw material risks. For example, they can proactively align their Circular Economy, supply chain or investment strategies accordingly. This study creates a foundation for scientists to enable companies to realise the synergies of corporate raw material criticality assessments. A literature review is combined with semi-structured interviews with industry experts. Results show that company-specific data is the main opportunity for customisation, uncovering company-specific risks and progress, but are rarely included. Less than 5 % of the investigated environmental, social and supply risk indicators are company specific. Furthermore, varying assessment levels impede linking of risk evaluation and mitigation. Only two methodologies considered Circular Economy strategies beyond recycling. Overall, the variance in reporting and information depth poses a major challenge for application. A methodology profile is developed for prospective methodologies as means to provide an standardised overview and underscore their distinctive features. The profile and our raw material risk management cycle facilitate companies’ application and scientists’ further development. Prospective research avenues concern the linking of assessment levels, systematic coupling of risk mitigation measures, risks associated with secondary materials, risks in the downstream value chain and new opportunities arising from the digital transformation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21153,"journal":{"name":"Resources Conservation and Recycling","volume":"219 ","pages":"Article 108299"},"PeriodicalIF":11.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resources Conservation and Recycling","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344925001788","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The European economy and its low-carbon transition relies on raw material deposits of few countries. Companies can enhance Europe's resilience and gain a strategic advantage by systematically mapping and actively managing their company-specific raw material risks. For example, they can proactively align their Circular Economy, supply chain or investment strategies accordingly. This study creates a foundation for scientists to enable companies to realise the synergies of corporate raw material criticality assessments. A literature review is combined with semi-structured interviews with industry experts. Results show that company-specific data is the main opportunity for customisation, uncovering company-specific risks and progress, but are rarely included. Less than 5 % of the investigated environmental, social and supply risk indicators are company specific. Furthermore, varying assessment levels impede linking of risk evaluation and mitigation. Only two methodologies considered Circular Economy strategies beyond recycling. Overall, the variance in reporting and information depth poses a major challenge for application. A methodology profile is developed for prospective methodologies as means to provide an standardised overview and underscore their distinctive features. The profile and our raw material risk management cycle facilitate companies’ application and scientists’ further development. Prospective research avenues concern the linking of assessment levels, systematic coupling of risk mitigation measures, risks associated with secondary materials, risks in the downstream value chain and new opportunities arising from the digital transformation.

Abstract Image

作为企业循环经济战略决策支持的原材料临界性评估——系统回顾
欧洲经济及其低碳转型依赖于少数几个国家的原材料储备。通过系统地绘制和积极管理公司特定的原材料风险,公司可以增强欧洲的弹性,并获得战略优势。例如,他们可以相应地主动调整循环经济、供应链或投资战略。这项研究为科学家们创造了一个基础,使公司能够实现企业原材料临界性评估的协同效应。文献综述与对行业专家的半结构化访谈相结合。结果表明,公司特定数据是定制的主要机会,揭示了公司特定的风险和进展,但很少包括在内。在被调查的环境、社会和供应风险指标中,只有不到5%是公司特有的。此外,不同的评估水平阻碍了风险评估和减轻风险之间的联系。只有两种方法考虑了循环经济战略之外的回收利用。总的来说,报告和信息深度的差异对应用程序构成了主要挑战。为前瞻性方法制定了方法概况,作为提供标准化概述和强调其独特特征的手段。我们的简介和原材料风险管理周期有助于公司的应用和科学家的进一步发展。前瞻性研究途径涉及评估水平之间的联系、风险缓解措施的系统耦合、与二手材料相关的风险、下游价值链中的风险以及数字化转型带来的新机遇。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Resources Conservation and Recycling
Resources Conservation and Recycling 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
22.90
自引率
6.10%
发文量
625
审稿时长
23 days
期刊介绍: The journal Resources, Conservation & Recycling welcomes contributions from research, which consider sustainable management and conservation of resources. The journal prioritizes understanding the transformation processes crucial for transitioning toward more sustainable production and consumption systems. It highlights technological, economic, institutional, and policy aspects related to specific resource management practices such as conservation, recycling, and resource substitution, as well as broader strategies like improving resource productivity and restructuring production and consumption patterns. Contributions may address regional, national, or international scales and can range from individual resources or technologies to entire sectors or systems. Authors are encouraged to explore scientific and methodological issues alongside practical, environmental, and economic implications. However, manuscripts focusing solely on laboratory experiments without discussing their broader implications will not be considered for publication in the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信