Sky T. Button , Donald J. Brown , Jonah Piovia-Scott
{"title":"Amphibians reveal unexpectedly large differences in potential climate change responses among ecologically similar habitat specialists","authors":"Sky T. Button , Donald J. Brown , Jonah Piovia-Scott","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113488","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Climate change is substantially impacting earth’s biodiversity, with a massive number of affected species that are difficult to study comprehensively. An “indicator species” approach that generalizes species-specific climate change impacts to broader groups (e.g., ecological groups) could theoretically help overcome this challenge and streamline climate-smart conservation planning. We assessed this approach’s viability using four specialist amphibians (<em>Ascaphus montanus</em>, <em>Dicamptodon copei, Plethodon idahoensis</em>, and <em>Plethodon vandykei</em>), for which we expected convergent forecasted trajectories under climate change given that all four species belong to the same group of narrowly groundwater-dependent amphibians in the Pacific Northwest, USA. Using boosted regression trees, we constructed species distribution models (SDMs) for each species and (if applicable) major intraspecific lineage, then forecasted species’ trajectories under two climate change scenarios (SSP370 and SSP585) and timeframes (mid-century and late-century). Contrary to our expectation, potential trajectories varied widely among species; most notably, a late-century three-fold potential gain in highly-suitable areas for <em>P. idahoensis</em> was contrasted with a potential three-fold loss for the sister species <em>P. vandykei</em>. Further, lineage-specific SDMs for <em>P. vandykei</em> suggested negligible climate change vulnerability for coastal populations but major vulnerability for Cascades populations. Thus, divergent climate change projections persisted even at an intraspecific scale. Based on our findings, the use of climate change “indicator species” to represent broader groups can be misleading, even within narrowly-defined groups wherein organisms have considerable genetic and ecological overlaps. Lastly, species-tailored variables (e.g., stream or cliff-face seep refugial properties) had consistently high explanatory power, yet many lacked the necessary data to forecast future species’ trajectories, highlighting an important future research need.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11459,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Indicators","volume":"174 ","pages":"Article 113488"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Indicators","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X25004182","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Climate change is substantially impacting earth’s biodiversity, with a massive number of affected species that are difficult to study comprehensively. An “indicator species” approach that generalizes species-specific climate change impacts to broader groups (e.g., ecological groups) could theoretically help overcome this challenge and streamline climate-smart conservation planning. We assessed this approach’s viability using four specialist amphibians (Ascaphus montanus, Dicamptodon copei, Plethodon idahoensis, and Plethodon vandykei), for which we expected convergent forecasted trajectories under climate change given that all four species belong to the same group of narrowly groundwater-dependent amphibians in the Pacific Northwest, USA. Using boosted regression trees, we constructed species distribution models (SDMs) for each species and (if applicable) major intraspecific lineage, then forecasted species’ trajectories under two climate change scenarios (SSP370 and SSP585) and timeframes (mid-century and late-century). Contrary to our expectation, potential trajectories varied widely among species; most notably, a late-century three-fold potential gain in highly-suitable areas for P. idahoensis was contrasted with a potential three-fold loss for the sister species P. vandykei. Further, lineage-specific SDMs for P. vandykei suggested negligible climate change vulnerability for coastal populations but major vulnerability for Cascades populations. Thus, divergent climate change projections persisted even at an intraspecific scale. Based on our findings, the use of climate change “indicator species” to represent broader groups can be misleading, even within narrowly-defined groups wherein organisms have considerable genetic and ecological overlaps. Lastly, species-tailored variables (e.g., stream or cliff-face seep refugial properties) had consistently high explanatory power, yet many lacked the necessary data to forecast future species’ trajectories, highlighting an important future research need.
期刊介绍:
The ultimate aim of Ecological Indicators is to integrate the monitoring and assessment of ecological and environmental indicators with management practices. The journal provides a forum for the discussion of the applied scientific development and review of traditional indicator approaches as well as for theoretical, modelling and quantitative applications such as index development. Research into the following areas will be published.
• All aspects of ecological and environmental indicators and indices.
• New indicators, and new approaches and methods for indicator development, testing and use.
• Development and modelling of indices, e.g. application of indicator suites across multiple scales and resources.
• Analysis and research of resource, system- and scale-specific indicators.
• Methods for integration of social and other valuation metrics for the production of scientifically rigorous and politically-relevant assessments using indicator-based monitoring and assessment programs.
• How research indicators can be transformed into direct application for management purposes.
• Broader assessment objectives and methods, e.g. biodiversity, biological integrity, and sustainability, through the use of indicators.
• Resource-specific indicators such as landscape, agroecosystems, forests, wetlands, etc.