Amphibians reveal unexpectedly large differences in potential climate change responses among ecologically similar habitat specialists

IF 7 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Sky T. Button , Donald J. Brown , Jonah Piovia-Scott
{"title":"Amphibians reveal unexpectedly large differences in potential climate change responses among ecologically similar habitat specialists","authors":"Sky T. Button ,&nbsp;Donald J. Brown ,&nbsp;Jonah Piovia-Scott","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113488","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Climate change is substantially impacting earth’s biodiversity, with a massive number of affected species that are difficult to study comprehensively. An “indicator species” approach that generalizes species-specific climate change impacts to broader groups (e.g., ecological groups) could theoretically help overcome this challenge and streamline climate-smart conservation planning. We assessed this approach’s viability using four specialist amphibians (<em>Ascaphus montanus</em>, <em>Dicamptodon copei, Plethodon idahoensis</em>, and <em>Plethodon vandykei</em>), for which we expected convergent forecasted trajectories under climate change given that all four species belong to the same group of narrowly groundwater-dependent amphibians in the Pacific Northwest, USA. Using boosted regression trees, we constructed species distribution models (SDMs) for each species and (if applicable) major intraspecific lineage, then forecasted species’ trajectories under two climate change scenarios (SSP370 and SSP585) and timeframes (mid-century and late-century). Contrary to our expectation, potential trajectories varied widely among species; most notably, a late-century three-fold potential gain in highly-suitable areas for <em>P. idahoensis</em> was contrasted with a potential three-fold loss for the sister species <em>P. vandykei</em>. Further, lineage-specific SDMs for <em>P. vandykei</em> suggested negligible climate change vulnerability for coastal populations but major vulnerability for Cascades populations. Thus, divergent climate change projections persisted even at an intraspecific scale. Based on our findings, the use of climate change “indicator species” to represent broader groups can be misleading, even within narrowly-defined groups wherein organisms have considerable genetic and ecological overlaps. Lastly, species-tailored variables (e.g., stream or cliff-face seep refugial properties) had consistently high explanatory power, yet many lacked the necessary data to forecast future species’ trajectories, highlighting an important future research need.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11459,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Indicators","volume":"174 ","pages":"Article 113488"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Indicators","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X25004182","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Climate change is substantially impacting earth’s biodiversity, with a massive number of affected species that are difficult to study comprehensively. An “indicator species” approach that generalizes species-specific climate change impacts to broader groups (e.g., ecological groups) could theoretically help overcome this challenge and streamline climate-smart conservation planning. We assessed this approach’s viability using four specialist amphibians (Ascaphus montanus, Dicamptodon copei, Plethodon idahoensis, and Plethodon vandykei), for which we expected convergent forecasted trajectories under climate change given that all four species belong to the same group of narrowly groundwater-dependent amphibians in the Pacific Northwest, USA. Using boosted regression trees, we constructed species distribution models (SDMs) for each species and (if applicable) major intraspecific lineage, then forecasted species’ trajectories under two climate change scenarios (SSP370 and SSP585) and timeframes (mid-century and late-century). Contrary to our expectation, potential trajectories varied widely among species; most notably, a late-century three-fold potential gain in highly-suitable areas for P. idahoensis was contrasted with a potential three-fold loss for the sister species P. vandykei. Further, lineage-specific SDMs for P. vandykei suggested negligible climate change vulnerability for coastal populations but major vulnerability for Cascades populations. Thus, divergent climate change projections persisted even at an intraspecific scale. Based on our findings, the use of climate change “indicator species” to represent broader groups can be misleading, even within narrowly-defined groups wherein organisms have considerable genetic and ecological overlaps. Lastly, species-tailored variables (e.g., stream or cliff-face seep refugial properties) had consistently high explanatory power, yet many lacked the necessary data to forecast future species’ trajectories, highlighting an important future research need.

Abstract Image

在生态相似的栖息地专家中,两栖动物在潜在的气候变化反应中显示出意想不到的巨大差异
气候变化严重影响着地球的生物多样性,受影响的物种数量巨大,难以全面研究。“指示物种”方法将特定物种的气候变化影响推广到更广泛的群体(例如生态群体),理论上可以帮助克服这一挑战并简化气候智能型保护规划。我们用四种特殊的两栖动物(Ascaphus montanus, Dicamptodon copei, Plethodon idahoensis和Plethodon vandykei)来评估这种方法的可行性,考虑到这四种物种都属于美国太平洋西北部狭窄的依赖地下水的两栖动物群体,我们预计气候变化下的预测轨迹会趋同。利用增强回归树构建了各物种和种内主要谱系的物种分布模型(SDMs),并预测了两种气候变化情景(SSP370和SSP585)和时间框架(世纪中叶和世纪后期)下的物种分布轨迹。与我们的预期相反,物种之间的潜在轨迹差异很大;最值得注意的是,与姐妹种P. vandykei的3倍潜在损失相比,在高度适宜的地区,P. idahoensis在本世纪后期的潜在收益为3倍。此外,vandykei的谱系特异性SDMs表明沿海种群的气候变化脆弱性可以忽略不计,而Cascades种群的脆弱性则很大。因此,不同的气候变化预测即使在种内尺度上也持续存在。根据我们的发现,使用气候变化“指示物种”来代表更广泛的群体可能会产生误导,即使在生物具有相当大的遗传和生态重叠的狭窄定义群体中也是如此。最后,物种定制变量(例如,溪流或悬崖表面渗漏避难属性)一直具有很高的解释力,但许多变量缺乏预测未来物种轨迹的必要数据,这突出了未来重要的研究需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecological Indicators
Ecological Indicators 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
11.80
自引率
8.70%
发文量
1163
审稿时长
78 days
期刊介绍: The ultimate aim of Ecological Indicators is to integrate the monitoring and assessment of ecological and environmental indicators with management practices. The journal provides a forum for the discussion of the applied scientific development and review of traditional indicator approaches as well as for theoretical, modelling and quantitative applications such as index development. Research into the following areas will be published. • All aspects of ecological and environmental indicators and indices. • New indicators, and new approaches and methods for indicator development, testing and use. • Development and modelling of indices, e.g. application of indicator suites across multiple scales and resources. • Analysis and research of resource, system- and scale-specific indicators. • Methods for integration of social and other valuation metrics for the production of scientifically rigorous and politically-relevant assessments using indicator-based monitoring and assessment programs. • How research indicators can be transformed into direct application for management purposes. • Broader assessment objectives and methods, e.g. biodiversity, biological integrity, and sustainability, through the use of indicators. • Resource-specific indicators such as landscape, agroecosystems, forests, wetlands, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信