{"title":"Comparative study on carbon emission spatial network and carbon emission reduction collaboration in urban agglomerations","authors":"Yongqiang Dong , Lanjian Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113487","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Collaborative carbon reduction in urban agglomerations is imperative under China’s regional integration development strategy and dual-carbon goals. However, whether existing collaborative requirements align with the spatially networked reality of carbon emissions and deliver expected effects remains unclear, hindering deeper coordination. This study evaluates the status of carbon reduction collaboration in the Yangtze River Delta urban agglomeration through collaborative quantity and intensity dimensions. Social network analysis reveals the carbon emission spatial network structure, while a collaborative quantity/centrality versus intensity/centrality scatter plot assesses their alignment. QAP analysis tests collaborative efficacy. It finds that collaboration exhibits a core-periphery structure dominated by central cities, driven by inspections, framework agreements, and cooperation agreements, with peripheral cities compensating low participation through intensity-driven catch-up effects. The carbon emission network displays pronounced core-periphery characteristics with growing complexity, where core cities control regional emission flows while peripheral cities show limited influence, forming distinct net spillovers and agents. Mismatches exist between collaboration patterns and emission networks: central cities dominate cooperation, while peripheral cities lack initiative; intensity polarization and provincial-level mini-clubs prevail. Collaboration exerts no significant impact on emission network formation due to entrenched core-periphery power hierarchies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11459,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Indicators","volume":"174 ","pages":"Article 113487"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Indicators","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X25004170","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Collaborative carbon reduction in urban agglomerations is imperative under China’s regional integration development strategy and dual-carbon goals. However, whether existing collaborative requirements align with the spatially networked reality of carbon emissions and deliver expected effects remains unclear, hindering deeper coordination. This study evaluates the status of carbon reduction collaboration in the Yangtze River Delta urban agglomeration through collaborative quantity and intensity dimensions. Social network analysis reveals the carbon emission spatial network structure, while a collaborative quantity/centrality versus intensity/centrality scatter plot assesses their alignment. QAP analysis tests collaborative efficacy. It finds that collaboration exhibits a core-periphery structure dominated by central cities, driven by inspections, framework agreements, and cooperation agreements, with peripheral cities compensating low participation through intensity-driven catch-up effects. The carbon emission network displays pronounced core-periphery characteristics with growing complexity, where core cities control regional emission flows while peripheral cities show limited influence, forming distinct net spillovers and agents. Mismatches exist between collaboration patterns and emission networks: central cities dominate cooperation, while peripheral cities lack initiative; intensity polarization and provincial-level mini-clubs prevail. Collaboration exerts no significant impact on emission network formation due to entrenched core-periphery power hierarchies.
期刊介绍:
The ultimate aim of Ecological Indicators is to integrate the monitoring and assessment of ecological and environmental indicators with management practices. The journal provides a forum for the discussion of the applied scientific development and review of traditional indicator approaches as well as for theoretical, modelling and quantitative applications such as index development. Research into the following areas will be published.
• All aspects of ecological and environmental indicators and indices.
• New indicators, and new approaches and methods for indicator development, testing and use.
• Development and modelling of indices, e.g. application of indicator suites across multiple scales and resources.
• Analysis and research of resource, system- and scale-specific indicators.
• Methods for integration of social and other valuation metrics for the production of scientifically rigorous and politically-relevant assessments using indicator-based monitoring and assessment programs.
• How research indicators can be transformed into direct application for management purposes.
• Broader assessment objectives and methods, e.g. biodiversity, biological integrity, and sustainability, through the use of indicators.
• Resource-specific indicators such as landscape, agroecosystems, forests, wetlands, etc.