The use of social media platforms in adult basic life support research: a scoping review

IF 2.1 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Nino Fijačko , Sebastian Schnaubelt , Giuseppe Stirparo , Elena Maria Ticozzi , Giuseppe Ristagno , Federico Semeraro , Robert Greif
{"title":"The use of social media platforms in adult basic life support research: a scoping review","authors":"Nino Fijačko ,&nbsp;Sebastian Schnaubelt ,&nbsp;Giuseppe Stirparo ,&nbsp;Elena Maria Ticozzi ,&nbsp;Giuseppe Ristagno ,&nbsp;Federico Semeraro ,&nbsp;Robert Greif","doi":"10.1016/j.resplu.2025.100953","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Social media (SoMe) is expanding globally, with increasing adoption in research, including resuscitation science. Its widespread reach and growing influence make it a valuable tool for research and knowledge dissemination. We aimed to assess the utilization of SoMe, highlight its applications, and identify future research areas, specifically in data collection and analysis, education and training, and professional networking and collaboration.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Embase, Scopus, and PubMed were searched through October 30th, 2024. Titles and abstracts were screened, and duplicates removed. The PCC (Population, Concept, and Context) framework defined the population as SoMe users, the concept as adult BLS-related content, and the context as SoMe platforms used for data analysis, data collection, teaching, campaigns, communication, and sharing, excluding traditional media.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The search yielded 5,427 articles, with 201 undergoing full-text review and 42 included. Most studies were from high-income countries (19/42; 45%) and had a cross-sectional design (16/42; 36%). SoMe was primarily used for data analysis (17/42; 41%) and data collection (16/42; 36%). YouTube and X were the frequently applied SoMe platforms (12 studies each; 29%), while Instagram and WhatsApp supported diverse applications. In contrast, Snapchat and TikTok were used less frequently and for narrower purposes.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Existing studies focus on data collection and analysis, mainly via YouTube and X, but inconsistencies in design and geography call for standardized reporting to enhance comparability and impact. Future studies could standardize reporting on SoMe applications in adult BLS using established frameworks to ensure comparability and effectiveness.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":94192,"journal":{"name":"Resuscitation plus","volume":"23 ","pages":"Article 100953"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resuscitation plus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666520425000906","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Social media (SoMe) is expanding globally, with increasing adoption in research, including resuscitation science. Its widespread reach and growing influence make it a valuable tool for research and knowledge dissemination. We aimed to assess the utilization of SoMe, highlight its applications, and identify future research areas, specifically in data collection and analysis, education and training, and professional networking and collaboration.

Methods

Embase, Scopus, and PubMed were searched through October 30th, 2024. Titles and abstracts were screened, and duplicates removed. The PCC (Population, Concept, and Context) framework defined the population as SoMe users, the concept as adult BLS-related content, and the context as SoMe platforms used for data analysis, data collection, teaching, campaigns, communication, and sharing, excluding traditional media.

Results

The search yielded 5,427 articles, with 201 undergoing full-text review and 42 included. Most studies were from high-income countries (19/42; 45%) and had a cross-sectional design (16/42; 36%). SoMe was primarily used for data analysis (17/42; 41%) and data collection (16/42; 36%). YouTube and X were the frequently applied SoMe platforms (12 studies each; 29%), while Instagram and WhatsApp supported diverse applications. In contrast, Snapchat and TikTok were used less frequently and for narrower purposes.

Conclusions

Existing studies focus on data collection and analysis, mainly via YouTube and X, but inconsistencies in design and geography call for standardized reporting to enhance comparability and impact. Future studies could standardize reporting on SoMe applications in adult BLS using established frameworks to ensure comparability and effectiveness.
在成人基本生命支持研究中使用社交媒体平台:范围审查
社交媒体(SoMe)正在全球范围内扩张,在包括复苏科学在内的研究中越来越多地采用。它的广泛影响和日益增长的影响使它成为研究和知识传播的宝贵工具。我们旨在评估人工智能的利用情况,突出其应用,并确定未来的研究领域,特别是在数据收集和分析、教育和培训以及专业网络和协作方面。方法检索截止到2024年10月30日的sembase、Scopus和PubMed。对标题和摘要进行了筛选,并删除了重复的内容。PCC(人口、概念和背景)框架将人口定义为一些用户,将概念定义为与劳工统计局相关的成人内容,将背景定义为用于数据分析、数据收集、教学、活动、交流和分享的一些平台,不包括传统媒体。结果共检索到5427篇文章,其中201篇进行了全文审阅,42篇被收录。大多数研究来自高收入国家(19/42;45%),采用横截面设计(16/42;36%)。SoMe主要用于数据分析(17/42;41%)和数据收集(16/42;36%)。YouTube和X是被频繁使用的一些平台(各12项研究;29%),而Instagram和WhatsApp支持多种应用程序。相比之下,Snapchat和TikTok的使用频率较低,用途也较窄。现有的研究侧重于数据收集和分析,主要通过YouTube和X,但设计和地理上的不一致性要求标准化报告,以增强可比性和影响力。未来的研究可以使用已建立的框架来标准化成人劳工统计局中某些应用的报告,以确保可比性和有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Resuscitation plus
Resuscitation plus Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
52 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信