Regional disparities and trends in national ESG performance across africa: A comparative analysis (1990–2020)

Jeremy Ko , Chun Kai Leung , Albert Nii Dodoo , Favour David Agbajor
{"title":"Regional disparities and trends in national ESG performance across africa: A comparative analysis (1990–2020)","authors":"Jeremy Ko ,&nbsp;Chun Kai Leung ,&nbsp;Albert Nii Dodoo ,&nbsp;Favour David Agbajor","doi":"10.1016/j.igd.2025.100231","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study examines national ESG (environmental, social, and governance) performance across 24 African countries over three decades (1990–2020), employing a disaggregated approach to assess sustainability outcomes. Building on the World Bank's Sovereign ESG Framework and using the entropy weight method, the research assigns weightings of 42.13 ​% to environmental factors, 30.39 ​% to social factors, and 27.47 ​% to governance factors. By segmenting the period into three decade-based intervals, the study systematically captures long-term trends and short-term disruptions in sustainability performance. The analysis reveals notable regional disparities and temporal shifts in ESG scores, with significant improvements in social and governance dimensions in some regions contrasted by modest gains or even declines in environmental indicators. These outcomes highlight the challenges of measuring sustainability in contexts marked by heterogeneous institutional capacities and diverse socio-economic dynamics. Furthermore, the study identifies that formal metrics often overlook grassroots sustainability practices rooted in informal networks. The findings underscore the need for tailored policy interventions that integrate both conventional and non-traditional sustainability measures, thereby providing nuanced insights for policymakers and practitioners aiming to bridge gaps in conventional ESG frameworks. This research not only contributes to the academic discourse on national sustainability assessments but also offers practical recommendations for enhancing regional ESG strategies in Africa.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100674,"journal":{"name":"Innovation and Green Development","volume":"4 3","pages":"Article 100231"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovation and Green Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949753125000281","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examines national ESG (environmental, social, and governance) performance across 24 African countries over three decades (1990–2020), employing a disaggregated approach to assess sustainability outcomes. Building on the World Bank's Sovereign ESG Framework and using the entropy weight method, the research assigns weightings of 42.13 ​% to environmental factors, 30.39 ​% to social factors, and 27.47 ​% to governance factors. By segmenting the period into three decade-based intervals, the study systematically captures long-term trends and short-term disruptions in sustainability performance. The analysis reveals notable regional disparities and temporal shifts in ESG scores, with significant improvements in social and governance dimensions in some regions contrasted by modest gains or even declines in environmental indicators. These outcomes highlight the challenges of measuring sustainability in contexts marked by heterogeneous institutional capacities and diverse socio-economic dynamics. Furthermore, the study identifies that formal metrics often overlook grassroots sustainability practices rooted in informal networks. The findings underscore the need for tailored policy interventions that integrate both conventional and non-traditional sustainability measures, thereby providing nuanced insights for policymakers and practitioners aiming to bridge gaps in conventional ESG frameworks. This research not only contributes to the academic discourse on national sustainability assessments but also offers practical recommendations for enhancing regional ESG strategies in Africa.
非洲国家ESG绩效的区域差异和趋势:比较分析(1990-2020年)
本研究考察了30年来(1990-2020年)24个非洲国家的国家ESG(环境、社会和治理)绩效,采用分类方法评估可持续性成果。本研究以世界银行主权ESG框架为基础,运用熵权法,对环境因素、社会因素和治理因素分别赋予42.13%、30.39%和27.47%的权重。通过将这一时期划分为三个以十年为基础的间隔,该研究系统地捕捉了可持续发展绩效的长期趋势和短期中断。分析显示,ESG得分存在显著的地区差异和时间变化,一些地区在社会和治理方面取得了显著进步,而环境指标则略有上升甚至下降。这些结果突出了在体制能力各异和社会经济动态各异的背景下衡量可持续性所面临的挑战。此外,该研究还指出,正式的衡量标准往往忽略了植根于非正式网络的基层可持续发展实践。研究结果强调需要有针对性的政策干预措施,将传统和非传统的可持续性措施结合起来,从而为旨在弥合传统ESG框架差距的政策制定者和从业者提供细致的见解。本研究不仅有助于国家可持续性评估的学术论述,而且为加强非洲的区域ESG战略提供了实用建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信