PCDe: A personalized conversational debiasing framework for next POI recommendation with uncertain check-ins

IF 6 1区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Chen Li , Guoyan Huang , Zhu Sun , Lu Zhang , Shanshan Feng , Guanfeng Liu
{"title":"PCDe: A personalized conversational debiasing framework for next POI recommendation with uncertain check-ins","authors":"Chen Li ,&nbsp;Guoyan Huang ,&nbsp;Zhu Sun ,&nbsp;Lu Zhang ,&nbsp;Shanshan Feng ,&nbsp;Guanfeng Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.neunet.2025.107443","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In the next point-of-interest (POI) recommendation, users may visit <em>individual POIs</em> within larger gathering places, such as shopping malls (termed as <em>collective POIs</em>), leading to uncertain check-ins. Our data analysis unveils that (1) the presence of such uncertain check-ins raises a new type of bias, termed as <em>scale bias</em>, that is, the recommender tends to recommend collective POIs over individual POIs, which further exacerbates the commonly-observed <em>popularity bias</em>, that is, the recommender tends to recommend popular POIs rather than unpopular ones; and (2) the existence of the above two types of biases significantly affects the fairness of next POI recommendation with uncertain check-ins. Therefore, we propose a <u>P</u>ersonalized <u>C</u>onversational <u>De</u>biasing framework (PCDe) by exploiting the advantages of conversational techniques to capture personalized dynamic user preferences, thereby mitigating both scale and popularity biases at a personalized level. Specifically, the <em>inquiry component</em> designs an improved question-and-answer manner based on personalized information entropy, thus mitigating the scale bias. The <em>rewarding component</em> then introduces a novel debiasing reward mechanism based on the Jensen–Shannon divergence to make the recommendations better aligned with users’ historical preferences on popularity, thereby addressing the popularity bias. Extensive experiments demonstrate the superiority of our proposed PCDe over state-of-the-arts (SOTAs) regarding mitigating scale and popularity biases while enhancing recommendation accuracy thanks to its personalized debiasing mechanism.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49763,"journal":{"name":"Neural Networks","volume":"188 ","pages":"Article 107443"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neural Networks","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0893608025003223","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the next point-of-interest (POI) recommendation, users may visit individual POIs within larger gathering places, such as shopping malls (termed as collective POIs), leading to uncertain check-ins. Our data analysis unveils that (1) the presence of such uncertain check-ins raises a new type of bias, termed as scale bias, that is, the recommender tends to recommend collective POIs over individual POIs, which further exacerbates the commonly-observed popularity bias, that is, the recommender tends to recommend popular POIs rather than unpopular ones; and (2) the existence of the above two types of biases significantly affects the fairness of next POI recommendation with uncertain check-ins. Therefore, we propose a Personalized Conversational Debiasing framework (PCDe) by exploiting the advantages of conversational techniques to capture personalized dynamic user preferences, thereby mitigating both scale and popularity biases at a personalized level. Specifically, the inquiry component designs an improved question-and-answer manner based on personalized information entropy, thus mitigating the scale bias. The rewarding component then introduces a novel debiasing reward mechanism based on the Jensen–Shannon divergence to make the recommendations better aligned with users’ historical preferences on popularity, thereby addressing the popularity bias. Extensive experiments demonstrate the superiority of our proposed PCDe over state-of-the-arts (SOTAs) regarding mitigating scale and popularity biases while enhancing recommendation accuracy thanks to its personalized debiasing mechanism.
PCDe:一个个性化的会话消除框架,用于不确定签入的下一个POI推荐
在下一个兴趣点(POI)建议中,用户可能会访问较大的聚集场所(如购物中心)中的单个POI(称为集体POI),从而导致不确定的签到。我们的数据分析显示:(1)这种不确定签到的存在引发了一种新的偏差,称为尺度偏差,即推荐人倾向于推荐集体poi而不是单个poi,这进一步加剧了普遍观察到的人气偏差,即推荐人倾向于推荐流行的poi而不是不流行的poi;(2)上述两类偏差的存在显著影响不确定签到下一个POI推荐的公平性。因此,我们提出了一个个性化会话去偏见框架(PCDe),利用会话技术的优势来捕捉个性化的动态用户偏好,从而在个性化层面上减轻规模和流行偏见。具体而言,查询组件设计了一种基于个性化信息熵的改进问答方式,从而减轻了尺度偏差。然后,奖励部分引入了一种基于Jensen-Shannon分歧的新型去偏见奖励机制,使推荐更好地与用户对受欢迎程度的历史偏好保持一致,从而解决受欢迎程度偏见。大量的实验表明,我们提出的PCDe在减轻规模和人气偏差方面优于最先进的sota,同时由于其个性化的去偏机制而提高了推荐的准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neural Networks
Neural Networks 工程技术-计算机:人工智能
CiteScore
13.90
自引率
7.70%
发文量
425
审稿时长
67 days
期刊介绍: Neural Networks is a platform that aims to foster an international community of scholars and practitioners interested in neural networks, deep learning, and other approaches to artificial intelligence and machine learning. Our journal invites submissions covering various aspects of neural networks research, from computational neuroscience and cognitive modeling to mathematical analyses and engineering applications. By providing a forum for interdisciplinary discussions between biology and technology, we aim to encourage the development of biologically-inspired artificial intelligence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信