Unraveling the pain points of domain modeling

IF 3.8 2区计算机科学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS

Information and Software Technology Pub Date : 2025-04-09 DOI:10.1016/j.infsof.2025.107736

Isadora Valle , Tiago Prince Sales , Eduardo Guerra , Maya Daneva , Renata Guizzardi , Luiz Olavo Bonino da Silva Santos , Henderik A. Proper , Giancarlo Guizzardi

{"title":"Unraveling the pain points of domain modeling","authors":"Isadora Valle , Tiago Prince Sales , Eduardo Guerra , Maya Daneva , Renata Guizzardi , Luiz Olavo Bonino da Silva Santos , Henderik A. Proper , Giancarlo Guizzardi","doi":"10.1016/j.infsof.2025.107736","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Conceptual models offer numerous benefits but require significant investments, requiring modelers to strive to balance costs and benefits. Understanding the modeling process and the frustrations experienced by modelers can provide valuable insights for this assessment. While research acknowledges certain instances of modelers’ dissatisfaction, its scope often limits detailed examination. This study seeks to identify and analyze the main pain points associated with domain modeling through a five-phase empirical study using a multi-method approach. We identified <strong>71</strong> pain points, synthesized them to <strong>41</strong>, and prioritized <strong>16</strong> as the most significant and prevalent in domain modeling. We then refined, documented, and exemplified the prioritized pain points, analyzed their potential causes, and discussed their practical implications. Our findings provide valuable insights for improving modelers’ experiences and optimizing the modeling process.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54983,"journal":{"name":"Information and Software Technology","volume":"183 ","pages":"Article 107736"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information and Software Technology","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950584925000758","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Conceptual models offer numerous benefits but require significant investments, requiring modelers to strive to balance costs and benefits. Understanding the modeling process and the frustrations experienced by modelers can provide valuable insights for this assessment. While research acknowledges certain instances of modelers’ dissatisfaction, its scope often limits detailed examination. This study seeks to identify and analyze the main pain points associated with domain modeling through a five-phase empirical study using a multi-method approach. We identified 71 pain points, synthesized them to 41, and prioritized 16 as the most significant and prevalent in domain modeling. We then refined, documented, and exemplified the prioritized pain points, analyzed their potential causes, and discussed their practical implications. Our findings provide valuable insights for improving modelers’ experiences and optimizing the modeling process.

查看原文本刊更多论文

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Information and Software Technology 工程技术-计算机：软件工程

CiteScore

9.10

自引率

7.70%

发文量

164

审稿时长

9.6 weeks

期刊介绍： Information and Software Technology is the international archival journal focusing on research and experience that contributes to the improvement of software development practices. The journal''s scope includes methods and techniques to better engineer software and manage its development. Articles submitted for review should have a clear component of software engineering or address ways to improve the engineering and management of software development. Areas covered by the journal include: • Software management, quality and metrics, • Software processes, • Software architecture, modelling, specification, design and programming • Functional and non-functional software requirements • Software testing and verification & validation • Empirical studies of all aspects of engineering and managing software development Short Communications is a new section dedicated to short papers addressing new ideas, controversial opinions, "Negative" results and much more. Read the Guide for authors for more information. The journal encourages and welcomes submissions of systematic literature studies (reviews and maps) within the scope of the journal. Information and Software Technology is the premiere outlet for systematic literature studies in software engineering.