Future strategies of thermal power enterprises: What new chapter will be unveiled by the joint mechanism of energy rights and renewable energy certificates?

IF 7.9 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Yan Li, Tian-tian Feng, Xiao-qi Sun, Li-li Liu, Cheng Zhong
{"title":"Future strategies of thermal power enterprises: What new chapter will be unveiled by the joint mechanism of energy rights and renewable energy certificates?","authors":"Yan Li,&nbsp;Tian-tian Feng,&nbsp;Xiao-qi Sun,&nbsp;Li-li Liu,&nbsp;Cheng Zhong","doi":"10.1016/j.esr.2025.101713","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The escalating global energy transition imperative has intensified governmental focus on market-based mechanisms for energy governance. This study constructs a four-party evolutionary game model incorporating prospect theory and multi-objective optimization methods to systematically investigate the combined effects of policy synergy mechanisms and market incentive designs on the development of Energy-consuming Rights Trading (ERT). We find that a dynamic penalty mechanism can effectively induce compliance from firms. Driven by loss aversion, firms prefer policy defaults, highlighting unique behavioral responses under conditions of policy uncertainty. Through 525 multi-objective optimization experiments, the study identifies Pareto-optimal policy combinations at different stages. These findings suggest that combining high penalty thresholds with gradual policy integration can enhance policy effectiveness during the incubation of the ERT market. The combination of “High integration-moderate government intervention” (a = 0.05, B3 = 3.2, C3 = 3.2) can maximize ERT market activity while minimizing government intervention costs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11546,"journal":{"name":"Energy Strategy Reviews","volume":"59 ","pages":"Article 101713"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Strategy Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211467X25000768","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The escalating global energy transition imperative has intensified governmental focus on market-based mechanisms for energy governance. This study constructs a four-party evolutionary game model incorporating prospect theory and multi-objective optimization methods to systematically investigate the combined effects of policy synergy mechanisms and market incentive designs on the development of Energy-consuming Rights Trading (ERT). We find that a dynamic penalty mechanism can effectively induce compliance from firms. Driven by loss aversion, firms prefer policy defaults, highlighting unique behavioral responses under conditions of policy uncertainty. Through 525 multi-objective optimization experiments, the study identifies Pareto-optimal policy combinations at different stages. These findings suggest that combining high penalty thresholds with gradual policy integration can enhance policy effectiveness during the incubation of the ERT market. The combination of “High integration-moderate government intervention” (a = 0.05, B3 = 3.2, C3 = 3.2) can maximize ERT market activity while minimizing government intervention costs.
火电企业未来战略:能源权与可再生能源证书联动机制将揭开什么新篇章?
全球能源转型势在必行,各国政府更加注重以市场为基础的能源治理机制。本文运用前景理论和多目标优化方法构建了一个四方演化博弈模型,系统考察了政策协同机制和市场激励设计对耗能权交易发展的综合影响。研究发现,动态惩罚机制可以有效地诱导企业服从。在损失厌恶的驱动下,企业倾向于政策违约,这突出了在政策不确定性条件下的独特行为反应。通过525次多目标优化实验,确定了不同阶段的帕累托最优策略组合。这些研究结果表明,在ERT市场孵化期间,将高惩罚门槛与逐步政策整合相结合可以提高政策有效性。“高整合-适度政府干预”组合(a = 0.05, B3 = 3.2, C3 = 3.2)可以最大化ERT市场活动,同时最小化政府干预成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy Strategy Reviews
Energy Strategy Reviews Energy-Energy (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
12.80
自引率
4.90%
发文量
167
审稿时长
40 weeks
期刊介绍: Energy Strategy Reviews is a gold open access journal that provides authoritative content on strategic decision-making and vision-sharing related to society''s energy needs. Energy Strategy Reviews publishes: • Analyses • Methodologies • Case Studies • Reviews And by invitation: • Report Reviews • Viewpoints
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信