{"title":"Exploring the impacts of climate change on ecological footprint in Iran: A dynamic input-output analysis","authors":"Alireza Keshavarz , Zakariya Farajzadeh","doi":"10.1016/j.envdev.2025.101217","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The negative impacts of climate change in Iran are coupled with considerable ecological deficits, which are expected to worsen under unfavorable climatic conditions. This study investigates the impacts of climate change on ecological variables using a dynamic and novel Input-Output model. The applied data included the Iranian Input-Output table, ecological footprint, and damage matrix. The findings indicated that Iran's fragile economic growth is associated with a significant ecological footprint and a concerning ecological deficit. Based on the simulation results, energy consumption constitutes approximately 75–76 % of the overall ecological footprint, whereas the cropland footprint contributes approximately 10–12 %. The annual growth rate of these components, which typically fluctuates around 2.5 %, spans a broader range of −0.5 %–1.8 % owing to the influence of climate change. Under the business-as-usual scenario, the total ecological footprint is expected to surpass 8 gha (global hectares) by 2060. However, under climate change options, the majority will likely be confined within the range of 5–6.5 gha. The study revealed an increase in ecological deficits, especially when considering mild climate variations. The ecological coordination coefficient experienced a decrease, indicating a disparity between economic development and the state of the ecological environment. Sectoral analysis showed that approximately 70 % of the ecological footprint originates from the services sector, whereas the agricultural and manufacturing sectors each contribute 8–9.5 %. The findings also demonstrated that the shift from agricultural to non-agricultural activities increases the ecological footprint intensity of agricultural practices while significantly reducing it for other sectors, particularly services.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54269,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Development","volume":"55 ","pages":"Article 101217"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Development","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211464525000831","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The negative impacts of climate change in Iran are coupled with considerable ecological deficits, which are expected to worsen under unfavorable climatic conditions. This study investigates the impacts of climate change on ecological variables using a dynamic and novel Input-Output model. The applied data included the Iranian Input-Output table, ecological footprint, and damage matrix. The findings indicated that Iran's fragile economic growth is associated with a significant ecological footprint and a concerning ecological deficit. Based on the simulation results, energy consumption constitutes approximately 75–76 % of the overall ecological footprint, whereas the cropland footprint contributes approximately 10–12 %. The annual growth rate of these components, which typically fluctuates around 2.5 %, spans a broader range of −0.5 %–1.8 % owing to the influence of climate change. Under the business-as-usual scenario, the total ecological footprint is expected to surpass 8 gha (global hectares) by 2060. However, under climate change options, the majority will likely be confined within the range of 5–6.5 gha. The study revealed an increase in ecological deficits, especially when considering mild climate variations. The ecological coordination coefficient experienced a decrease, indicating a disparity between economic development and the state of the ecological environment. Sectoral analysis showed that approximately 70 % of the ecological footprint originates from the services sector, whereas the agricultural and manufacturing sectors each contribute 8–9.5 %. The findings also demonstrated that the shift from agricultural to non-agricultural activities increases the ecological footprint intensity of agricultural practices while significantly reducing it for other sectors, particularly services.
期刊介绍:
Environmental Development provides a future oriented, pro-active, authoritative source of information and learning for researchers, postgraduate students, policymakers, and managers, and bridges the gap between fundamental research and the application in management and policy practices. It stimulates the exchange and coupling of traditional scientific knowledge on the environment, with the experiential knowledge among decision makers and other stakeholders and also connects natural sciences and social and behavioral sciences. Environmental Development includes and promotes scientific work from the non-western world, and also strengthens the collaboration between the developed and developing world. Further it links environmental research to broader issues of economic and social-cultural developments, and is intended to shorten the delays between research and publication, while ensuring thorough peer review. Environmental Development also creates a forum for transnational communication, discussion and global action.
Environmental Development is open to a broad range of disciplines and authors. The journal welcomes, in particular, contributions from a younger generation of researchers, and papers expanding the frontiers of environmental sciences, pointing at new directions and innovative answers.
All submissions to Environmental Development are reviewed using the general criteria of quality, originality, precision, importance of topic and insights, clarity of exposition, which are in keeping with the journal''s aims and scope.