Individual versus social optimization in statistical estimation

IF 0.9 4区 管理学 Q4 OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE
Moshe Haviv
{"title":"Individual versus social optimization in statistical estimation","authors":"Moshe Haviv","doi":"10.1016/j.orl.2025.107284","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>A number of estimators participate in a non-cooperative game where the data they collect are reported to a central planner who takes decisions. She in her turn decides on the estimates to be imposed on the participants. Because they are aware of this, they may behave strategically and misreport. We exemplify this decision making process where the James-Stein's estimator is used by the central planner. In particular, we consider the resulting optimization or Nash equilibria reporting strategies in a number of variations of this game.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54682,"journal":{"name":"Operations Research Letters","volume":"61 ","pages":"Article 107284"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Operations Research Letters","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167637725000458","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A number of estimators participate in a non-cooperative game where the data they collect are reported to a central planner who takes decisions. She in her turn decides on the estimates to be imposed on the participants. Because they are aware of this, they may behave strategically and misreport. We exemplify this decision making process where the James-Stein's estimator is used by the central planner. In particular, we consider the resulting optimization or Nash equilibria reporting strategies in a number of variations of this game.
统计估计中的个人与社会优化
许多估计者参与一个非合作博弈,他们收集的数据被报告给一个中央计划者,后者负责决策。由她来决定对参与者施加的估计。因为他们意识到了这一点,他们可能会表现得很有策略,甚至会误报。我们举例说明了中央计划者使用詹姆斯-斯坦估计器的决策过程。特别地,我们考虑在这个博弈的许多变体中产生的最优化或纳什均衡报告策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Operations Research Letters
Operations Research Letters 管理科学-运筹学与管理科学
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
111
审稿时长
83 days
期刊介绍: Operations Research Letters is committed to the rapid review and fast publication of short articles on all aspects of operations research and analytics. Apart from a limitation to eight journal pages, quality, originality, relevance and clarity are the only criteria for selecting the papers to be published. ORL covers the broad field of optimization, stochastic models and game theory. Specific areas of interest include networks, routing, location, queueing, scheduling, inventory, reliability, and financial engineering. We wish to explore interfaces with other fields such as life sciences and health care, artificial intelligence and machine learning, energy distribution, and computational social sciences and humanities. Our traditional strength is in methodology, including theory, modelling, algorithms and computational studies. We also welcome novel applications and concise literature reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信