Waiel Abusnina, Abhishek Chaturvedi, Kalyan R. Chitturi, Lior Lupu, Dan Haberman, Matteo Cellamare, Vaishnavi Sawant, Cheng Zhang, Itsik Ben-Dor, Lowell F. Satler, Hayder D. Hashim, Brian C. Case, Ron Waksman
{"title":"Gender disparities in cangrelor usage for the treatment of patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention","authors":"Waiel Abusnina, Abhishek Chaturvedi, Kalyan R. Chitturi, Lior Lupu, Dan Haberman, Matteo Cellamare, Vaishnavi Sawant, Cheng Zhang, Itsik Ben-Dor, Lowell F. Satler, Hayder D. Hashim, Brian C. Case, Ron Waksman","doi":"10.1016/j.ijcard.2025.133280","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Cangrelor is a rapid, potent intravenous P2Y12 inhibitor that reduces thrombotic and ischemic events in patients with myocardial infarction (MI) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). This study aimed to investigate gender disparities in Cangrelor usage, efficacy, and safety across gender in patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) undergoing PCI.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This is an observational retrospective analysis included patients presented with ACS who underwent PCI and received Cangrelor at MedStar Washington Hospital Center (2018–2023). Access to Cangrelor across gender was recorded. The primary safety outcome was in-hospital thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) major bleeding, while the primary efficacy outcome was in-hospital major adverse cardiac events (MACE): defined as the composite of in-hospital cardiac death, MI, and stroke. A control group was investigated gender disparities in patients with ACS who did not receive Cangrelor.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 2859 patients with ACS underwent PCI (991 women and 1868 men). Among these patients, women were less likely to receive Cangrelor during PCI compared to men (40.2 % vs. 48 %; <em>P</em> < 0.001). The Cangrelor cohort consisted of 1295 patients (398 women, 897 men), and among those, women had significantly higher rates of in-hospital TIMI major bleeding (3.5 % vs. 0.6 %; <em>P</em> < 0.001) and higher in-hospital MACE (5.0 % vs. 1.3 %; P < 0.001) compared to men. Multivariate modeling after adjusting for differences in baseline characteristics showed that women were associated with increased TIMI major bleeding (OR 4.02, 95 %CI 1.09–14.79; P 0.037), but not in-hospital MACE (OR 2.11, 95 %CI 0.88–5.07; P 0.096). In the non-Cangrelor cohort, there were no significant difference between women and men in TIMI major bleeding (0.8 % vs. 0.9 %, <em>P</em> = 0.865) and MACE (1.5 % vs. 1.6, <em>P</em> = 0.842).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>In patients presenting with ACS, women who received cangrelor had higher rates of TIMI major bleeding, without an impact on MACE. This may partially explain why women with ACS undergoing PCI receive less cangrelor compared to men. Therefore, increased bleeding events in women receiving cangrelor warrant further investigation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":13710,"journal":{"name":"International journal of cardiology","volume":"432 ","pages":"Article 133280"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167527325003237","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Cangrelor is a rapid, potent intravenous P2Y12 inhibitor that reduces thrombotic and ischemic events in patients with myocardial infarction (MI) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). This study aimed to investigate gender disparities in Cangrelor usage, efficacy, and safety across gender in patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) undergoing PCI.
Methods
This is an observational retrospective analysis included patients presented with ACS who underwent PCI and received Cangrelor at MedStar Washington Hospital Center (2018–2023). Access to Cangrelor across gender was recorded. The primary safety outcome was in-hospital thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) major bleeding, while the primary efficacy outcome was in-hospital major adverse cardiac events (MACE): defined as the composite of in-hospital cardiac death, MI, and stroke. A control group was investigated gender disparities in patients with ACS who did not receive Cangrelor.
Results
A total of 2859 patients with ACS underwent PCI (991 women and 1868 men). Among these patients, women were less likely to receive Cangrelor during PCI compared to men (40.2 % vs. 48 %; P < 0.001). The Cangrelor cohort consisted of 1295 patients (398 women, 897 men), and among those, women had significantly higher rates of in-hospital TIMI major bleeding (3.5 % vs. 0.6 %; P < 0.001) and higher in-hospital MACE (5.0 % vs. 1.3 %; P < 0.001) compared to men. Multivariate modeling after adjusting for differences in baseline characteristics showed that women were associated with increased TIMI major bleeding (OR 4.02, 95 %CI 1.09–14.79; P 0.037), but not in-hospital MACE (OR 2.11, 95 %CI 0.88–5.07; P 0.096). In the non-Cangrelor cohort, there were no significant difference between women and men in TIMI major bleeding (0.8 % vs. 0.9 %, P = 0.865) and MACE (1.5 % vs. 1.6, P = 0.842).
Conclusion
In patients presenting with ACS, women who received cangrelor had higher rates of TIMI major bleeding, without an impact on MACE. This may partially explain why women with ACS undergoing PCI receive less cangrelor compared to men. Therefore, increased bleeding events in women receiving cangrelor warrant further investigation.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Cardiology is devoted to cardiology in the broadest sense. Both basic research and clinical papers can be submitted. The journal serves the interest of both practicing clinicians and researchers.
In addition to original papers, we are launching a range of new manuscript types, including Consensus and Position Papers, Systematic Reviews, Meta-analyses, and Short communications. Case reports are no longer acceptable. Controversial techniques, issues on health policy and social medicine are discussed and serve as useful tools for encouraging debate.