Kai Tao, Bin Zeng, Linghui Deng, Wei Zhang, Xianghong Zhou, Yuming Jin, Zilong Zhang, Weichao Huang, Xiaoli Zou, Yu Zhan, Ping Lu, Shi Qiu, Lu Yang* and Qiang Wei*,
{"title":"Associations between Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances Exposures and Bone Mineral: A Systematic Review and Best Evidence Synthesis","authors":"Kai Tao, Bin Zeng, Linghui Deng, Wei Zhang, Xianghong Zhou, Yuming Jin, Zilong Zhang, Weichao Huang, Xiaoli Zou, Yu Zhan, Ping Lu, Shi Qiu, Lu Yang* and Qiang Wei*, ","doi":"10.1021/envhealth.4c0014310.1021/envhealth.4c00143","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are persistent environmental pollutants known for their bioaccumulative nature. Reduced bone mineral density (BMD) is associated with an increased risk of developing osteoporosis. This pioneering study aims to assess the effects of different PFAS compounds on bone mineral. We conducted searches on online databases. Inclusion criteria included the presence of associations between perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), perfluorooctanesulfonate (PFOS), perfluorohexanesulfonic acid (PFHxS), perfluorononanoic acid (PFNA), and perfluorodecanoic acid (PFDA) and BMD, BMD z-score, and bone mineral content (BMC). Meta-analyses were performed. Best evidence synthesis (BES) was performed to summarize the results. The results of BES showed that the evidence of PFOS, PFOA and PFNA with reduced bone mineral were moderate. The variability in methods for assessing bone mineral and sex differences are potential sources of heterogeneity in the results. Meta analysis showed that PFOA was associated with BMD (β −0.01, 95% CI −0.01 to −0.00; <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 0%). Subgroup analysis by sex showed that PFOS (β −0.01, 95% CI −0.01 to −0.00; <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 50%), PFOA (β −0.01, 95% CI −0.01 to +0.00; <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 29%) were negatively correlated with BMD. This systematic review and BES revealed negative correlations between exposure to PFOS, PFOA, PFNA and bone mineral. Sex emerged as a potential factor affecting the negative effects of PFAS on bone mineral. The damage of PFAS to bone mineral still requires further exploration.</p>","PeriodicalId":29795,"journal":{"name":"Environment & Health","volume":"3 4","pages":"363–372 363–372"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/epdf/10.1021/envhealth.4c00143","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environment & Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/envhealth.4c00143","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are persistent environmental pollutants known for their bioaccumulative nature. Reduced bone mineral density (BMD) is associated with an increased risk of developing osteoporosis. This pioneering study aims to assess the effects of different PFAS compounds on bone mineral. We conducted searches on online databases. Inclusion criteria included the presence of associations between perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), perfluorooctanesulfonate (PFOS), perfluorohexanesulfonic acid (PFHxS), perfluorononanoic acid (PFNA), and perfluorodecanoic acid (PFDA) and BMD, BMD z-score, and bone mineral content (BMC). Meta-analyses were performed. Best evidence synthesis (BES) was performed to summarize the results. The results of BES showed that the evidence of PFOS, PFOA and PFNA with reduced bone mineral were moderate. The variability in methods for assessing bone mineral and sex differences are potential sources of heterogeneity in the results. Meta analysis showed that PFOA was associated with BMD (β −0.01, 95% CI −0.01 to −0.00; I2 = 0%). Subgroup analysis by sex showed that PFOS (β −0.01, 95% CI −0.01 to −0.00; I2 = 50%), PFOA (β −0.01, 95% CI −0.01 to +0.00; I2 = 29%) were negatively correlated with BMD. This systematic review and BES revealed negative correlations between exposure to PFOS, PFOA, PFNA and bone mineral. Sex emerged as a potential factor affecting the negative effects of PFAS on bone mineral. The damage of PFAS to bone mineral still requires further exploration.
期刊介绍:
Environment & Health a peer-reviewed open access journal is committed to exploring the relationship between the environment and human health.As a premier journal for multidisciplinary research Environment & Health reports the health consequences for individuals and communities of changing and hazardous environmental factors. In supporting the UN Sustainable Development Goals the journal aims to help formulate policies to create a healthier world.Topics of interest include but are not limited to:Air water and soil pollutionExposomicsEnvironmental epidemiologyInnovative analytical methodology and instrumentation (multi-omics non-target analysis effect-directed analysis high-throughput screening etc.)Environmental toxicology (endocrine disrupting effect neurotoxicity alternative toxicology computational toxicology epigenetic toxicology etc.)Environmental microbiology pathogen and environmental transmission mechanisms of diseasesEnvironmental modeling bioinformatics and artificial intelligenceEmerging contaminants (including plastics engineered nanomaterials etc.)Climate change and related health effectHealth impacts of energy evolution and carbon neutralizationFood and drinking water safetyOccupational exposure and medicineInnovations in environmental technologies for better healthPolicies and international relations concerned with environmental health