Measuring meaning-based well-being in individuals with dementia: the creation and validation of the well-being in dementia inventory

IF 6 2区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Zehra B Turel, Allan Perry, Alexander Balicki, Elizabeta Mukaetova-Ladinska, Estefania Vargas Triguero, Anna Lesniak, John Maltby
{"title":"Measuring meaning-based well-being in individuals with dementia: the creation and validation of the well-being in dementia inventory","authors":"Zehra B Turel, Allan Perry, Alexander Balicki, Elizabeta Mukaetova-Ladinska, Estefania Vargas Triguero, Anna Lesniak, John Maltby","doi":"10.1093/ageing/afaf092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite growing attention to well-being in dementia, few studies have defined meaning-based (eudaimonic) well-being in this population, mainly due to challenges posed by cognitive decline and self-report limitations. We developed and validated a novel tool for measuring meaning-based well-being in individuals with dementia, particularly those receiving residential or home care. The study included two samples: carers of 174 care home residents and carers of 420 community-dwelling individuals for whom respondents reported dementia. The Well-being in Dementia Inventory (WiDI) assesses six core dimensions: Self-Sufficiency, Functional Mastery, Goal-Based Mastery, Purposeful Engagement, Positive Interactions and Constructive Self-Perspective. Confirmatory Factor Analysis established the WiDI’s six-factor structure, underscoring its multidimensional nature and equivalence across community-dwelling individuals, regardless of gender, age group (younger-old/mid-older-old), or care context (family or professional). The scale exhibited high internal and inter-rater reliability, though very low scores in the care home sample inflated these statistics. Concurrent validity was confirmed through strong correlations with adapted indices of meaning-based well-being (e.g. the Scales of Psychological Well-being and the Mental Health Continuum Short Form, commonly used in non-dementia samples), indicating the WiDI’s conceptual consistency. These findings clarify how meaning-based well-being can be assessed in individuals with dementia and introduce the WiDI as a reliable and valid tool for assessing well-being, suggesting broad applicability across care settings. These results have important implications for practice and policy, advocating a meaning-based approach to well-being assessments that ensures holistic, personalised care by focusing on key indicators of life quality.","PeriodicalId":7682,"journal":{"name":"Age and ageing","volume":"90 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Age and ageing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afaf092","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite growing attention to well-being in dementia, few studies have defined meaning-based (eudaimonic) well-being in this population, mainly due to challenges posed by cognitive decline and self-report limitations. We developed and validated a novel tool for measuring meaning-based well-being in individuals with dementia, particularly those receiving residential or home care. The study included two samples: carers of 174 care home residents and carers of 420 community-dwelling individuals for whom respondents reported dementia. The Well-being in Dementia Inventory (WiDI) assesses six core dimensions: Self-Sufficiency, Functional Mastery, Goal-Based Mastery, Purposeful Engagement, Positive Interactions and Constructive Self-Perspective. Confirmatory Factor Analysis established the WiDI’s six-factor structure, underscoring its multidimensional nature and equivalence across community-dwelling individuals, regardless of gender, age group (younger-old/mid-older-old), or care context (family or professional). The scale exhibited high internal and inter-rater reliability, though very low scores in the care home sample inflated these statistics. Concurrent validity was confirmed through strong correlations with adapted indices of meaning-based well-being (e.g. the Scales of Psychological Well-being and the Mental Health Continuum Short Form, commonly used in non-dementia samples), indicating the WiDI’s conceptual consistency. These findings clarify how meaning-based well-being can be assessed in individuals with dementia and introduce the WiDI as a reliable and valid tool for assessing well-being, suggesting broad applicability across care settings. These results have important implications for practice and policy, advocating a meaning-based approach to well-being assessments that ensures holistic, personalised care by focusing on key indicators of life quality.
衡量痴呆症患者基于意义的幸福感:痴呆症量表幸福感的创建和验证
尽管人们越来越关注痴呆症患者的幸福感,但很少有研究定义这一人群的基于意义的幸福感,这主要是由于认知能力下降和自我报告限制带来的挑战。我们开发并验证了一种新的工具,用于测量痴呆症患者的基于意义的幸福感,特别是那些接受住院或家庭护理的人。该研究包括两个样本:174名养老院居民的护理人员和420名社区居民的护理人员,受访者报告说他们患有痴呆症。痴呆症幸福感量表(WiDI)评估六个核心维度:自给自足、功能掌握、基于目标的掌握、有目的的参与、积极互动和建设性的自我视角。验证性因子分析建立了WiDI的六因素结构,强调了其在社区居民中的多维性和等价性,无论性别、年龄组(年轻/中老年)或护理背景(家庭或专业)。量表显示出较高的内部和内部信度,尽管非常低的得分在养老院样本夸大了这些统计数据。同时效度通过与基于意义的幸福适应指数(如心理健康量表和心理健康连续统短表,通常用于非痴呆样本)的强相关性得到证实,表明WiDI的概念一致性。这些发现阐明了如何在痴呆症患者中评估基于意义的幸福感,并介绍了WiDI作为评估幸福感的可靠和有效的工具,表明了在护理环境中的广泛适用性。这些结果对实践和政策具有重要意义,倡导一种基于意义的福祉评估方法,通过关注生活质量的关键指标,确保全面、个性化的护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Age and ageing
Age and ageing 医学-老年医学
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
6.00%
发文量
796
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Age and Ageing is an international journal publishing refereed original articles and commissioned reviews on geriatric medicine and gerontology. Its range includes research on ageing and clinical, epidemiological, and psychological aspects of later life.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信