Diagnostic domains, differential diagnosis and conditions requiring further medical attention that are considered important in the assessment for Achilles tendinopathy: a Delphi consensus study
Peter Malliaras, Karin Gravare Silbernagel, Robert-Jan de Vos, Jaryd Bourke, Igor Sancho, Shawn L Hanlon, Anne-Sofie Agergaard, Roald Bahr, Natália Franco Netto Bittencourt, Marcelo Bordalo, Annelie Brorsson, Victoria Tzortziou Brown, Tanusha Cardoso, Sally Child, Ruth L Chimenti, Emma Cowley, Pieter D’Hooghe, Wayne Derman, Jonathan T Finnoff, Siu Ngor Fu, Jill Halstead, Bruce Hamilton, Katarina Maria Nilsson-Helander, Per Hölmich, Jonathan Houghton, Alicia M James, Kornelia Kulig, Amanda Lau, Samuel Ling, Nicola Maffulli, Lorenzo Masci, Sue Mayes, Sean Mc Auliffe, Carol McCrum, Dylan Morrissey, Shannon E Munteanu, Myles Calder Murphy, Richard Newsham-West, Seth O’Neill, Nat Padhiar, Theodora Papadopoulou, Jonathan D Rees, Ebonie Kendra Rio, Diego Ruffino, Alex Scott, Suzy Speirs, Yang Sun, Kristian Thorborg, Larissa Trease, Jan A N Verhaar, Evi Wezenbeek, Sue White, Jennifer A Zellers, S Zhang, Vasileios Korakakis, Bill Vicenzino
{"title":"Diagnostic domains, differential diagnosis and conditions requiring further medical attention that are considered important in the assessment for Achilles tendinopathy: a Delphi consensus study","authors":"Peter Malliaras, Karin Gravare Silbernagel, Robert-Jan de Vos, Jaryd Bourke, Igor Sancho, Shawn L Hanlon, Anne-Sofie Agergaard, Roald Bahr, Natália Franco Netto Bittencourt, Marcelo Bordalo, Annelie Brorsson, Victoria Tzortziou Brown, Tanusha Cardoso, Sally Child, Ruth L Chimenti, Emma Cowley, Pieter D’Hooghe, Wayne Derman, Jonathan T Finnoff, Siu Ngor Fu, Jill Halstead, Bruce Hamilton, Katarina Maria Nilsson-Helander, Per Hölmich, Jonathan Houghton, Alicia M James, Kornelia Kulig, Amanda Lau, Samuel Ling, Nicola Maffulli, Lorenzo Masci, Sue Mayes, Sean Mc Auliffe, Carol McCrum, Dylan Morrissey, Shannon E Munteanu, Myles Calder Murphy, Richard Newsham-West, Seth O’Neill, Nat Padhiar, Theodora Papadopoulou, Jonathan D Rees, Ebonie Kendra Rio, Diego Ruffino, Alex Scott, Suzy Speirs, Yang Sun, Kristian Thorborg, Larissa Trease, Jan A N Verhaar, Evi Wezenbeek, Sue White, Jennifer A Zellers, S Zhang, Vasileios Korakakis, Bill Vicenzino","doi":"10.1136/bjsports-2024-109185","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The absence of agreed methods to diagnose Achilles tendinopathy impedes research and clinical practice. This gap results in heterogeneous and/or poorly described study samples, making it challenging to apply findings in clinical practice. The aim of this Delphi study was to define consensus on (1) diagnostic domains; (2) differential diagnoses; and (3) conditions requiring further medical attention, when assessing for Achilles tendinopathy. We conducted a sequential three-stage process which included: (1) identifying diagnostic domains, differential diagnoses and conditions requiring further medical attention based on existing scoping reviews and clinical practice guidelines; (2) developing Delphi survey questions; and (3) administering a five-round Delphi online survey. Consensus was defined as ≥70% agreement. 52 participants completed the surveys. Four diagnostic domains were deemed essential and reached consensus (pain location (93%); pain during activity (97%); tests that provoke pain (87%); palpation to assess pain (83%)). 15 differential diagnoses reached consensus: 2 for both midportion and insertional (partial tear (80%); posterior ankle impingement (78%)), 6 for midportion (plantaris tendinopathy (84%); tibialis posterior or flexor hallucis longus tendinopathy/tenosynovitis (72%); flexor digitorum longus tendinopathy (77%); accessory soleus muscle (74%); paratendinopathy (86%); sural nerve neuropathy (81%)) and 7 for insertional (superficial (88%) and retrocalcaneal bursitis (86%); Haglund’s/calcaneal exostosis (80%), intratendinous calcifications (73%); Sever’s disease (78%); calcaneal stress reaction/fracture (80%); subtalar/ankle pain (71%)). Six conditions requiring further medical attention reached consensus: (Achilles tendon rupture (83%); systemic inflammatory joint disease (86%); metabolic syndrome (75%); familial hypercholesterolaemia (77%); endocrine and hormonal disorders (80%); drug reactions (77%)). This consensus identified essential diagnostic domains, differential diagnoses and conditions requiring further medical attention that should be considered when assessing for Achilles tendinopathy.","PeriodicalId":9276,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":"60 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2024-109185","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The absence of agreed methods to diagnose Achilles tendinopathy impedes research and clinical practice. This gap results in heterogeneous and/or poorly described study samples, making it challenging to apply findings in clinical practice. The aim of this Delphi study was to define consensus on (1) diagnostic domains; (2) differential diagnoses; and (3) conditions requiring further medical attention, when assessing for Achilles tendinopathy. We conducted a sequential three-stage process which included: (1) identifying diagnostic domains, differential diagnoses and conditions requiring further medical attention based on existing scoping reviews and clinical practice guidelines; (2) developing Delphi survey questions; and (3) administering a five-round Delphi online survey. Consensus was defined as ≥70% agreement. 52 participants completed the surveys. Four diagnostic domains were deemed essential and reached consensus (pain location (93%); pain during activity (97%); tests that provoke pain (87%); palpation to assess pain (83%)). 15 differential diagnoses reached consensus: 2 for both midportion and insertional (partial tear (80%); posterior ankle impingement (78%)), 6 for midportion (plantaris tendinopathy (84%); tibialis posterior or flexor hallucis longus tendinopathy/tenosynovitis (72%); flexor digitorum longus tendinopathy (77%); accessory soleus muscle (74%); paratendinopathy (86%); sural nerve neuropathy (81%)) and 7 for insertional (superficial (88%) and retrocalcaneal bursitis (86%); Haglund’s/calcaneal exostosis (80%), intratendinous calcifications (73%); Sever’s disease (78%); calcaneal stress reaction/fracture (80%); subtalar/ankle pain (71%)). Six conditions requiring further medical attention reached consensus: (Achilles tendon rupture (83%); systemic inflammatory joint disease (86%); metabolic syndrome (75%); familial hypercholesterolaemia (77%); endocrine and hormonal disorders (80%); drug reactions (77%)). This consensus identified essential diagnostic domains, differential diagnoses and conditions requiring further medical attention that should be considered when assessing for Achilles tendinopathy.
期刊介绍:
The British Journal of Sports Medicine (BJSM) is a dynamic platform that presents groundbreaking research, thought-provoking reviews, and meaningful discussions on sport and exercise medicine. Our focus encompasses various clinically-relevant aspects such as physiotherapy, physical therapy, and rehabilitation. With an aim to foster innovation, education, and knowledge translation, we strive to bridge the gap between research and practical implementation in the field. Our multi-media approach, including web, print, video, and audio resources, along with our active presence on social media, connects a global community of healthcare professionals dedicated to treating active individuals.