Canadian Rheumatology Association Guidance for Developing & Endorsing Quality Measures to Support Learning Health Systems.

Racheal Githumbi,Claire E H Barber,Susan J Bartlett,Karine Toupin-April,Marinka Twilt,Diane Lacaille,Cheryl Barnabe,Kiran Dhiman,Alison M Hoens,Adrian Grebowicz,Tara McMillan,Jessica Widdifield
{"title":"Canadian Rheumatology Association Guidance for Developing & Endorsing Quality Measures to Support Learning Health Systems.","authors":"Racheal Githumbi,Claire E H Barber,Susan J Bartlett,Karine Toupin-April,Marinka Twilt,Diane Lacaille,Cheryl Barnabe,Kiran Dhiman,Alison M Hoens,Adrian Grebowicz,Tara McMillan,Jessica Widdifield","doi":"10.3899/jrheum.2024-1065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE\r\nTo review methods for developing and endorsing Quality Measures (QMs) to inform a national quality measurement framework for rheumatology care in Canada.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nWe conducted a rapid environmental scan of measure development organizations from Canada, the United Kingdom, the United States and Australia. Major phases in the development of QMs were abstracted. The results were reviewed and synthesized with members of the Canadian Rheumatology Association's Digital Measurement Subcommittee through iterative review across 3 virtual meetings. The guidance was approved at the committee and the CRA board level.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nFive key steps in the measure development cycle are proposed including: conceptualization and prioritization, measure specification development, testing and validation, implementation and reporting, continuous evaluation and maintenance. Foundational to all phases is the engagement of individuals from diverse backgrounds with lived experience of disease, healthcare providers, quality measurement scientists, and partner organizations. Measures should be aligned with domains of quality (effectiveness, efficiency, equity, patient-centeredness, safety and timeliness of care delivery) and be developed transparently. Endorsement of future QMs should, at minimum, prioritize validity, feasibility and acceptability or use/usability.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSION\r\nThis paper establishes a comprehensive and relevant framework for the development and/or endorsement of QMs in Canadian rheumatology care. This framework will permit streamlining of future quality improvement efforts at the national level.","PeriodicalId":501812,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Rheumatology","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.2024-1065","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To review methods for developing and endorsing Quality Measures (QMs) to inform a national quality measurement framework for rheumatology care in Canada. METHODS We conducted a rapid environmental scan of measure development organizations from Canada, the United Kingdom, the United States and Australia. Major phases in the development of QMs were abstracted. The results were reviewed and synthesized with members of the Canadian Rheumatology Association's Digital Measurement Subcommittee through iterative review across 3 virtual meetings. The guidance was approved at the committee and the CRA board level. RESULTS Five key steps in the measure development cycle are proposed including: conceptualization and prioritization, measure specification development, testing and validation, implementation and reporting, continuous evaluation and maintenance. Foundational to all phases is the engagement of individuals from diverse backgrounds with lived experience of disease, healthcare providers, quality measurement scientists, and partner organizations. Measures should be aligned with domains of quality (effectiveness, efficiency, equity, patient-centeredness, safety and timeliness of care delivery) and be developed transparently. Endorsement of future QMs should, at minimum, prioritize validity, feasibility and acceptability or use/usability. CONCLUSION This paper establishes a comprehensive and relevant framework for the development and/or endorsement of QMs in Canadian rheumatology care. This framework will permit streamlining of future quality improvement efforts at the national level.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信