Implementing Screening and Counseling for Adolescent Mental Health and Substance Use.

IF 6.2 2区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
Sheila V Patel,Laura Hart,Graham Booth,Wendi Rotunda,Shannon Kugley,Meagan Pilar,Manny Schwimmer,Christiane Voisin,Stephen Koesters,Meera Viswanathan,Gerald Gartlehner
{"title":"Implementing Screening and Counseling for Adolescent Mental Health and Substance Use.","authors":"Sheila V Patel,Laura Hart,Graham Booth,Wendi Rotunda,Shannon Kugley,Meagan Pilar,Manny Schwimmer,Christiane Voisin,Stephen Koesters,Meera Viswanathan,Gerald Gartlehner","doi":"10.1542/peds.2024-070314","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"CONTEXT\r\nThe proportion of US adolescents experiencing mental health or substance use disorders continues to rise. Pediatricians are expected to deliver evidence-based screening and counseling, but multiple barriers impede implementation.\r\n\r\nOBJECTIVE\r\nThis systematic review assessed the effectiveness of implementation strategies-activities to enhance implementation, service, and health outcomes-to support integration of screening and counseling for mental health and substance use disorders (MHSUD) into primary care for children and adolescents.\r\n\r\nDATA SOURCES\r\nWe searched multiple databases for literature published since 2010.\r\n\r\nSTUDY SELECTION\r\nEligible studies compared any strategy to support implementation of a recommended intervention to prevent MHSUD among individuals ≤18 years in primary care to another strategy or no strategy.\r\n\r\nDATA EXTRACTION\r\nWe extracted data on study designs, populations, settings, clinical interventions, barriers and facilitators to implementation, implementation interventions and comparators, and results.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nEleven studies focused on implementing screening and counseling for depression, eating disorders, substance use disorders, and general behavioral health risk factors. Implementation approaches were multifaceted and consisted of incorporating behavioral health providers into primary care, facilitating learning collaboratives, providing support to clinicians, and using technology. These approaches generally resulted in increased screening, taking steps to address a positive screen, and initiation of treatment compared to using only minimal or no strategy.\r\n\r\nLIMITATIONS\r\nMultifaceted and overlapping implementation approaches evaluated in few studies with limited evidence on patient outcomes constrained our ability to make inferences.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nThe identified implementation approaches may improve some aspects of identifying and addressing MHSUD in primary care. The evidence, however, is limited.","PeriodicalId":20028,"journal":{"name":"Pediatrics","volume":"544 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2024-070314","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

CONTEXT The proportion of US adolescents experiencing mental health or substance use disorders continues to rise. Pediatricians are expected to deliver evidence-based screening and counseling, but multiple barriers impede implementation. OBJECTIVE This systematic review assessed the effectiveness of implementation strategies-activities to enhance implementation, service, and health outcomes-to support integration of screening and counseling for mental health and substance use disorders (MHSUD) into primary care for children and adolescents. DATA SOURCES We searched multiple databases for literature published since 2010. STUDY SELECTION Eligible studies compared any strategy to support implementation of a recommended intervention to prevent MHSUD among individuals ≤18 years in primary care to another strategy or no strategy. DATA EXTRACTION We extracted data on study designs, populations, settings, clinical interventions, barriers and facilitators to implementation, implementation interventions and comparators, and results. RESULTS Eleven studies focused on implementing screening and counseling for depression, eating disorders, substance use disorders, and general behavioral health risk factors. Implementation approaches were multifaceted and consisted of incorporating behavioral health providers into primary care, facilitating learning collaboratives, providing support to clinicians, and using technology. These approaches generally resulted in increased screening, taking steps to address a positive screen, and initiation of treatment compared to using only minimal or no strategy. LIMITATIONS Multifaceted and overlapping implementation approaches evaluated in few studies with limited evidence on patient outcomes constrained our ability to make inferences. CONCLUSIONS The identified implementation approaches may improve some aspects of identifying and addressing MHSUD in primary care. The evidence, however, is limited.
实施青少年心理健康和药物使用的筛查和咨询。
经历精神健康或物质使用障碍的美国青少年比例持续上升。儿科医生被期望提供基于证据的筛查和咨询,但多种障碍阻碍了实施。目的:本系统综述评估了实施策略的有效性——加强实施、服务和健康结果的活动——以支持将精神健康和物质使用障碍(MHSUD)的筛查和咨询纳入儿童和青少年的初级保健。数据来源我们在多个数据库中检索了2010年以来发表的文献。研究选择:符合条件的研究比较了支持在初级保健≤18岁的个体中实施推荐干预措施以预防MHSUD的任何策略与另一种策略或无策略。数据提取:我们提取了有关研究设计、人群、环境、临床干预、实施障碍和促进因素、实施干预和比较以及结果的数据。结果6项研究集中于实施抑郁症、饮食失调、物质使用障碍和一般行为健康危险因素的筛查和咨询。实施方法是多方面的,包括将行为健康提供者纳入初级保健,促进学习协作,向临床医生提供支持以及使用技术。与仅使用少量或不使用策略相比,这些方法通常导致增加筛查,采取措施解决阳性筛查并开始治疗。局限性:在少数研究中评估了多方面和重叠的实施方法,对患者结果的证据有限,限制了我们的推断能力。结论确定的实施方法可以改善初级保健中MHSUD识别和处理的某些方面。然而,证据是有限的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pediatrics
Pediatrics 医学-小儿科
CiteScore
12.80
自引率
5.00%
发文量
791
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: The Pediatrics® journal is the official flagship journal of the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP). It is widely cited in the field of pediatric medicine and is recognized as the leading journal in the field. The journal publishes original research and evidence-based articles, which provide authoritative information to help readers stay up-to-date with the latest developments in pediatric medicine. The content is peer-reviewed and undergoes rigorous evaluation to ensure its quality and reliability. Pediatrics also serves as a valuable resource for conducting new research studies and supporting education and training activities in the field of pediatrics. It aims to enhance the quality of pediatric outpatient and inpatient care by disseminating valuable knowledge and insights. As of 2023, Pediatrics has an impressive Journal Impact Factor (IF) Score of 8.0. The IF is a measure of a journal's influence and importance in the scientific community, with higher scores indicating a greater impact. This score reflects the significance and reach of the research published in Pediatrics, further establishing its prominence in the field of pediatric medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信