{"title":"Implementing Screening and Counseling for Adolescent Mental Health and Substance Use.","authors":"Sheila V Patel,Laura Hart,Graham Booth,Wendi Rotunda,Shannon Kugley,Meagan Pilar,Manny Schwimmer,Christiane Voisin,Stephen Koesters,Meera Viswanathan,Gerald Gartlehner","doi":"10.1542/peds.2024-070314","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"CONTEXT\r\nThe proportion of US adolescents experiencing mental health or substance use disorders continues to rise. Pediatricians are expected to deliver evidence-based screening and counseling, but multiple barriers impede implementation.\r\n\r\nOBJECTIVE\r\nThis systematic review assessed the effectiveness of implementation strategies-activities to enhance implementation, service, and health outcomes-to support integration of screening and counseling for mental health and substance use disorders (MHSUD) into primary care for children and adolescents.\r\n\r\nDATA SOURCES\r\nWe searched multiple databases for literature published since 2010.\r\n\r\nSTUDY SELECTION\r\nEligible studies compared any strategy to support implementation of a recommended intervention to prevent MHSUD among individuals ≤18 years in primary care to another strategy or no strategy.\r\n\r\nDATA EXTRACTION\r\nWe extracted data on study designs, populations, settings, clinical interventions, barriers and facilitators to implementation, implementation interventions and comparators, and results.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nEleven studies focused on implementing screening and counseling for depression, eating disorders, substance use disorders, and general behavioral health risk factors. Implementation approaches were multifaceted and consisted of incorporating behavioral health providers into primary care, facilitating learning collaboratives, providing support to clinicians, and using technology. These approaches generally resulted in increased screening, taking steps to address a positive screen, and initiation of treatment compared to using only minimal or no strategy.\r\n\r\nLIMITATIONS\r\nMultifaceted and overlapping implementation approaches evaluated in few studies with limited evidence on patient outcomes constrained our ability to make inferences.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nThe identified implementation approaches may improve some aspects of identifying and addressing MHSUD in primary care. The evidence, however, is limited.","PeriodicalId":20028,"journal":{"name":"Pediatrics","volume":"544 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2024-070314","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
CONTEXT
The proportion of US adolescents experiencing mental health or substance use disorders continues to rise. Pediatricians are expected to deliver evidence-based screening and counseling, but multiple barriers impede implementation.
OBJECTIVE
This systematic review assessed the effectiveness of implementation strategies-activities to enhance implementation, service, and health outcomes-to support integration of screening and counseling for mental health and substance use disorders (MHSUD) into primary care for children and adolescents.
DATA SOURCES
We searched multiple databases for literature published since 2010.
STUDY SELECTION
Eligible studies compared any strategy to support implementation of a recommended intervention to prevent MHSUD among individuals ≤18 years in primary care to another strategy or no strategy.
DATA EXTRACTION
We extracted data on study designs, populations, settings, clinical interventions, barriers and facilitators to implementation, implementation interventions and comparators, and results.
RESULTS
Eleven studies focused on implementing screening and counseling for depression, eating disorders, substance use disorders, and general behavioral health risk factors. Implementation approaches were multifaceted and consisted of incorporating behavioral health providers into primary care, facilitating learning collaboratives, providing support to clinicians, and using technology. These approaches generally resulted in increased screening, taking steps to address a positive screen, and initiation of treatment compared to using only minimal or no strategy.
LIMITATIONS
Multifaceted and overlapping implementation approaches evaluated in few studies with limited evidence on patient outcomes constrained our ability to make inferences.
CONCLUSIONS
The identified implementation approaches may improve some aspects of identifying and addressing MHSUD in primary care. The evidence, however, is limited.
期刊介绍:
The Pediatrics® journal is the official flagship journal of the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP). It is widely cited in the field of pediatric medicine and is recognized as the leading journal in the field.
The journal publishes original research and evidence-based articles, which provide authoritative information to help readers stay up-to-date with the latest developments in pediatric medicine. The content is peer-reviewed and undergoes rigorous evaluation to ensure its quality and reliability.
Pediatrics also serves as a valuable resource for conducting new research studies and supporting education and training activities in the field of pediatrics. It aims to enhance the quality of pediatric outpatient and inpatient care by disseminating valuable knowledge and insights.
As of 2023, Pediatrics has an impressive Journal Impact Factor (IF) Score of 8.0. The IF is a measure of a journal's influence and importance in the scientific community, with higher scores indicating a greater impact. This score reflects the significance and reach of the research published in Pediatrics, further establishing its prominence in the field of pediatric medicine.