Probabilistic Forecasting of Summer Wind Speed in China Using Multimodel Ensembles

IF 2.9 3区 地球科学 Q2 ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
Luying Ji, Yan Ji, Xiefei Zhi, Qixiang Luo, Shoupeng Zhu
{"title":"Probabilistic Forecasting of Summer Wind Speed in China Using Multimodel Ensembles","authors":"Luying Ji,&nbsp;Yan Ji,&nbsp;Xiefei Zhi,&nbsp;Qixiang Luo,&nbsp;Shoupeng Zhu","doi":"10.1029/2024EA003850","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Wind has a crucial impact on human socio-economic activities as well as the safety of life and property. Bayesian Model Averaging (BMA) and Ensemble Model Output Statistics (EMOS), are utilized to enhance the probabilistic forecasting skills for 10 m wind speed during the summer in China. A log-normal distribution-based BMA (L-BMA) model is developed for a fair comparison with the log-normal distribution-based EMOS model, while the traditional gamma distribution-based BMA (G-BMA) model serves as a benchmark. The comparisons between the multimodel ensemble forecasts and raw ensembles demonstrate that both BMA and EMOS models improve the probabilistic forecasting skills of 10 m wind speed in China, with the EMOS model showing particularly significant improvements. The L-BMA model generally outperforms the G-BMA model, illustrating that the log-normal distribution might be more appropriate for 10 m summer wind speed in China. Forecast error diagnosis is conducted through Brier Score (BS) decomposition, revealing that errors in predicting lower 10 m wind speeds primarily arise from inherent uncertainty and reliability characteristics, whereas forecast errors for higher wind speeds mainly attribute to the forecast resolution capability. The EMOS and two BMA models all decrease the reliability values, leading to lower BS values than the raw ensembles, but do not enhance the resolution capability. The analysis of a thunderstorm gale event indicates that the EMOS model provides more accurate forecasts than the raw ensembles and two BMA models.</p>","PeriodicalId":54286,"journal":{"name":"Earth and Space Science","volume":"12 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2024EA003850","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earth and Space Science","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024EA003850","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Wind has a crucial impact on human socio-economic activities as well as the safety of life and property. Bayesian Model Averaging (BMA) and Ensemble Model Output Statistics (EMOS), are utilized to enhance the probabilistic forecasting skills for 10 m wind speed during the summer in China. A log-normal distribution-based BMA (L-BMA) model is developed for a fair comparison with the log-normal distribution-based EMOS model, while the traditional gamma distribution-based BMA (G-BMA) model serves as a benchmark. The comparisons between the multimodel ensemble forecasts and raw ensembles demonstrate that both BMA and EMOS models improve the probabilistic forecasting skills of 10 m wind speed in China, with the EMOS model showing particularly significant improvements. The L-BMA model generally outperforms the G-BMA model, illustrating that the log-normal distribution might be more appropriate for 10 m summer wind speed in China. Forecast error diagnosis is conducted through Brier Score (BS) decomposition, revealing that errors in predicting lower 10 m wind speeds primarily arise from inherent uncertainty and reliability characteristics, whereas forecast errors for higher wind speeds mainly attribute to the forecast resolution capability. The EMOS and two BMA models all decrease the reliability values, leading to lower BS values than the raw ensembles, but do not enhance the resolution capability. The analysis of a thunderstorm gale event indicates that the EMOS model provides more accurate forecasts than the raw ensembles and two BMA models.

Abstract Image

基于多模式组合的中国夏季风速概率预报
风对人类社会经济活动以及生命财产安全有着至关重要的影响。利用贝叶斯平均模式(BMA)和集合模式输出统计(EMOS)提高了中国夏季10 m风速的概率预报能力。为了与基于对数正态分布的EMOS模型进行公平比较,建立了基于对数正态分布的BMA (L-BMA)模型,并以传统的基于伽马分布的BMA (G-BMA)模型作为基准。多模式集合预报与原始集合预报的对比表明,BMA和EMOS模式都提高了中国10 m风速的概率预报能力,其中EMOS模式的提高尤为显著。L-BMA模式总体上优于G-BMA模式,说明对数正态分布可能更适合中国10 m夏季风速。通过Brier Score (BS)分解进行预测误差诊断,发现10 m以下风速的预测误差主要来自于固有的不确定性和可靠性特征,而10 m以上风速的预测误差主要来自于预测分辨率。EMOS和两种BMA模型均降低了可靠性值,导致BS值低于原始集成,但没有提高分辨率。对一次雷暴大风事件的分析表明,EMOS模式预报精度高于原始系统和两种BMA模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Earth and Space Science
Earth and Space Science Earth and Planetary Sciences-General Earth and Planetary Sciences
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
3.20%
发文量
285
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊介绍: Marking AGU’s second new open access journal in the last 12 months, Earth and Space Science is the only journal that reflects the expansive range of science represented by AGU’s 62,000 members, including all of the Earth, planetary, and space sciences, and related fields in environmental science, geoengineering, space engineering, and biogeochemistry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信