Ming Xiang, Jingchao Li, Xianghua Zhang, Xuerui Wang, Xingxing Zhang, Hao Li
{"title":"Study on Breathing Effect Under the Coupled Flow Between Formation and Wellbore During Deepwater Drilling","authors":"Ming Xiang, Jingchao Li, Xianghua Zhang, Xuerui Wang, Xingxing Zhang, Hao Li","doi":"10.1155/gfl/6628523","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In deepwater drilling, due to the complex coupling mechanism between the wellbore and the formation, the breathing effect is easily induced. The formation of the breathing effect is closely related to the unstable flow between the wellbore and the opening–closing formation fractures. The breathing effect refers to the phenomenon where a portion of the drilling fluid enters the formation fractures during circulation and returns after circulation stops. Its characteristics are similar to those of a well overflow. However, confusing the two can lead to extremely serious consequences due to incorrect handling. Currently, research on the coupled wellbore–formation flow mechanism and the induced breathing effect is still limited, highlighting the urgent need for more refined techniques to identify the breathing effect. To address this issue, a numerical model of the wellbore breathing effect was established by combining the wellbore unsteady flow model and the fracture deformation model. This model comprehensively considers the effects of flow resistance, fluid compressibility, flow path expansion, fracture deformation, and the equivalent damage radius. The model was applied to a subsalt well in the deepwater region of Mexico, and the results showed that the model’s accuracy had an error of less than 10% compared to the field data. Simulations were conducted to analyze bottomhole ECD changes, mud loss during pump start, and mud backflow during pump stop under varying flow rates, which improved the accuracy of identifying the formation breathing effect. This study provides guidance for accurately identifying the breathing effect in the field.</p>","PeriodicalId":12512,"journal":{"name":"Geofluids","volume":"2025 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/gfl/6628523","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geofluids","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/gfl/6628523","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In deepwater drilling, due to the complex coupling mechanism between the wellbore and the formation, the breathing effect is easily induced. The formation of the breathing effect is closely related to the unstable flow between the wellbore and the opening–closing formation fractures. The breathing effect refers to the phenomenon where a portion of the drilling fluid enters the formation fractures during circulation and returns after circulation stops. Its characteristics are similar to those of a well overflow. However, confusing the two can lead to extremely serious consequences due to incorrect handling. Currently, research on the coupled wellbore–formation flow mechanism and the induced breathing effect is still limited, highlighting the urgent need for more refined techniques to identify the breathing effect. To address this issue, a numerical model of the wellbore breathing effect was established by combining the wellbore unsteady flow model and the fracture deformation model. This model comprehensively considers the effects of flow resistance, fluid compressibility, flow path expansion, fracture deformation, and the equivalent damage radius. The model was applied to a subsalt well in the deepwater region of Mexico, and the results showed that the model’s accuracy had an error of less than 10% compared to the field data. Simulations were conducted to analyze bottomhole ECD changes, mud loss during pump start, and mud backflow during pump stop under varying flow rates, which improved the accuracy of identifying the formation breathing effect. This study provides guidance for accurately identifying the breathing effect in the field.
期刊介绍:
Geofluids is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that provides a forum for original research and reviews relating to the role of fluids in mineralogical, chemical, and structural evolution of the Earth’s crust. Its explicit aim is to disseminate ideas across the range of sub-disciplines in which Geofluids research is carried out. To this end, authors are encouraged to stress the transdisciplinary relevance and international ramifications of their research. Authors are also encouraged to make their work as accessible as possible to readers from other sub-disciplines.
Geofluids emphasizes chemical, microbial, and physical aspects of subsurface fluids throughout the Earth’s crust. Geofluids spans studies of groundwater, terrestrial or submarine geothermal fluids, basinal brines, petroleum, metamorphic waters or magmatic fluids.