A Review of Analytical and Chemometric Strategies for Forensic Classification of Homemade Explosives

IF 3 Q2 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
Abdulrahman Aljanaahi, Muhammad K. Hakeem, Abdulla Aljanaahi, Iltaf Shah
{"title":"A Review of Analytical and Chemometric Strategies for Forensic Classification of Homemade Explosives","authors":"Abdulrahman Aljanaahi,&nbsp;Muhammad K. Hakeem,&nbsp;Abdulla Aljanaahi,&nbsp;Iltaf Shah","doi":"10.1002/ansa.70010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Homemade explosives (HMEs), commonly used in improvised explosive devices (IEDs), present a significant forensic challenge due to their chemical variability, accessibility and adaptability. Traditional forensic methodologies often struggle with environmental contamination, complex sample matrices and the non-specificity of precursor residues. Recent advances in analytical techniques and chemometric methods have enhanced the detection, classification and interpretation of explosive residues. Infrared (IR) spectroscopy and gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS) have seen improvements in spectral resolution and real-time detection capabilities, allowing for more accurate differentiation of explosive precursors. Thermal analysis techniques, such as thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), now provide refined kinetic modelling to assess the decomposition pathways of unstable energetic materials, improving forensic risk assessments. Additionally, x-ray diffraction (XRD) has contributed to forensic material sourcing by distinguishing between industrial-grade and improvised explosive formulations. Chemometric approaches, including principal component analysis (PCA), linear discriminant analysis (LDA) and partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA), have revolutionized forensic data analysis by improving classification accuracy and enabling automated identification of explosive components. Advanced machine learning models are being integrated with spectral datasets to enhance real-time decision-making in forensic laboratories and portable field devices. Despite these advancements, challenges remain in adapting laboratory-based techniques for field deployment, particularly in enhancing the sensitivity and robustness of portable analytical instruments. This review critically evaluates the latest developments in forensic analytical chemistry, highlighting strengths, limitations and emerging strategies to improve real-world HME detection and classification.</p>","PeriodicalId":93411,"journal":{"name":"Analytical science advances","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ansa.70010","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analytical science advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ansa.70010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Homemade explosives (HMEs), commonly used in improvised explosive devices (IEDs), present a significant forensic challenge due to their chemical variability, accessibility and adaptability. Traditional forensic methodologies often struggle with environmental contamination, complex sample matrices and the non-specificity of precursor residues. Recent advances in analytical techniques and chemometric methods have enhanced the detection, classification and interpretation of explosive residues. Infrared (IR) spectroscopy and gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS) have seen improvements in spectral resolution and real-time detection capabilities, allowing for more accurate differentiation of explosive precursors. Thermal analysis techniques, such as thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), now provide refined kinetic modelling to assess the decomposition pathways of unstable energetic materials, improving forensic risk assessments. Additionally, x-ray diffraction (XRD) has contributed to forensic material sourcing by distinguishing between industrial-grade and improvised explosive formulations. Chemometric approaches, including principal component analysis (PCA), linear discriminant analysis (LDA) and partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA), have revolutionized forensic data analysis by improving classification accuracy and enabling automated identification of explosive components. Advanced machine learning models are being integrated with spectral datasets to enhance real-time decision-making in forensic laboratories and portable field devices. Despite these advancements, challenges remain in adapting laboratory-based techniques for field deployment, particularly in enhancing the sensitivity and robustness of portable analytical instruments. This review critically evaluates the latest developments in forensic analytical chemistry, highlighting strengths, limitations and emerging strategies to improve real-world HME detection and classification.

Abstract Image

自制炸药法医学分类分析与化学计量学策略综述
自制炸药(HMEs)通常用于简易爆炸装置(ied),由于其化学变异性、可获得性和适应性,给法医带来了重大挑战。传统的法医方法经常与环境污染、复杂的样品基质和前体残留物的非特异性作斗争。分析技术和化学计量学方法的最新进展加强了对爆炸残留物的检测、分类和解释。红外光谱(IR)和气相色谱-质谱(GC-MS)在光谱分辨率和实时检测能力方面有所提高,可以更准确地区分爆炸前体。热分析技术,如热重分析(TGA)和差示扫描量热法(DSC),现在提供了精细的动力学模型来评估不稳定含能材料的分解途径,提高了法医风险评估。此外,x射线衍射(XRD)通过区分工业级和简易爆炸配方,为法医材料采购做出了贡献。化学计量学方法,包括主成分分析(PCA)、线性判别分析(LDA)和偏最小二乘判别分析(PLS-DA),通过提高分类精度和实现爆炸成分的自动识别,彻底改变了法医数据分析。先进的机器学习模型正在与光谱数据集相结合,以增强法医实验室和便携式现场设备的实时决策。尽管取得了这些进展,但在调整实验室技术以适应现场部署方面仍然存在挑战,特别是在提高便携式分析仪器的灵敏度和稳健性方面。这篇综述批判性地评估了法医分析化学的最新发展,突出了优势,局限性和新兴策略,以改善现实世界的HME检测和分类。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信