Instrument Line Shape Calibration and Comparison with TCCON Measurements for Greenhouse Gas Monitoring at a New COCCON Site in Korea

IF 2.2 4区 地球科学 Q3 METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES
Beni Adi Trisna, Miyeon Park, Sangwoo Kim, Seungnam Park, Jeongsoon Lee
{"title":"Instrument Line Shape Calibration and Comparison with TCCON Measurements for Greenhouse Gas Monitoring at a New COCCON Site in Korea","authors":"Beni Adi Trisna,&nbsp;Miyeon Park,&nbsp;Sangwoo Kim,&nbsp;Seungnam Park,&nbsp;Jeongsoon Lee","doi":"10.1007/s13143-025-00397-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>A new COllaborative Carbon Column Observing Network (COCCON) site has been established in South Korea to monitor greenhouse gases (GHGs) effectively. This study focuses on the calibration of the COCCON observing instrument through precise measurements of the instrumental line shape (ILS) parameters and comparison with TCCON measurements. The COCCON network employs Bruker's EM27/SUN mobile Fourier transform infrared spectrometer (mFTIR), requiring validation against data from high-resolution (HR-FTIR) instruments. To achieve this, we compared data from the mFTIR with Bruker's IFS 125HR HR-FTIR to derive an instrument-specific calibration factor. Two ILS values were obtained by analyzing the water vapor spectrum using the open path (OP) method and the C<sub>2</sub>H<sub>2</sub> Gas-filled cell (GFC) spectrum. The ILS measurements indicated a modulation efficiency amplitude (MEA) difference of 0.712% between the GFC and OP methods, with values of (0.982 ± 0.005) and (0.975 ± 0.008), respectively. Notably, a comparison of the XGas values derived from both sets of ILS parameters revealed a high degree of consistency, as indicated by slopes close to 1, suggesting that the choice of ILS parameters had minimal impact on the accuracy of XGas retrieval. In this study, a 0.82% increase in the MEA value led to increases of 0.17% in XCO<sub>2</sub>, 0.09% in XCH<sub>4</sub>, 0.13% in XCH<sub>4</sub>_S5P, and 0.14% in XCO concentrations. Furthermore, seasonal variations were observed in the mFTIR measurements for XCO<sub>2</sub>, XCH<sub>4</sub>, and XCO. The highest XCO<sub>2</sub> value recorded was 427.82 ± 0.56 ppmv in April 2024, while the lowest monthly average of 415.23 ± 0.58 ppmv was observed in September 2023. The highest XCH<sub>4</sub> concentration was recorded in September 2024 at 1.966 ± 0.021 ppmv, while the lowest occurred in March 2024, with a value of 1.917 ± 0.016 ppmv. The highest XCO concentration was observed in spring, reaching 0.114 ± 0.014 ppmv in March 2024, while the lowest was recorded in fall at 0.102 ± 0.011 ppmv in September 2024. Additionally, the mFTIR measurements were compared to those obtained from HR-FTIR to evaluate the compatibility between the COCCON and TCCON measurement methods. Results indicated a strong correlation between the two measurement techniques, with instrument-specific calibration factors ranging from 0.9884 for XCO to 1.0017 for XH<sub>2</sub>O. These results demonstrate that the mFTIR is ready for use in measurements at the COCCON site and for measurement campaigns in South Korea.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8556,"journal":{"name":"Asia-Pacific Journal of Atmospheric Sciences","volume":"61 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia-Pacific Journal of Atmospheric Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13143-025-00397-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A new COllaborative Carbon Column Observing Network (COCCON) site has been established in South Korea to monitor greenhouse gases (GHGs) effectively. This study focuses on the calibration of the COCCON observing instrument through precise measurements of the instrumental line shape (ILS) parameters and comparison with TCCON measurements. The COCCON network employs Bruker's EM27/SUN mobile Fourier transform infrared spectrometer (mFTIR), requiring validation against data from high-resolution (HR-FTIR) instruments. To achieve this, we compared data from the mFTIR with Bruker's IFS 125HR HR-FTIR to derive an instrument-specific calibration factor. Two ILS values were obtained by analyzing the water vapor spectrum using the open path (OP) method and the C2H2 Gas-filled cell (GFC) spectrum. The ILS measurements indicated a modulation efficiency amplitude (MEA) difference of 0.712% between the GFC and OP methods, with values of (0.982 ± 0.005) and (0.975 ± 0.008), respectively. Notably, a comparison of the XGas values derived from both sets of ILS parameters revealed a high degree of consistency, as indicated by slopes close to 1, suggesting that the choice of ILS parameters had minimal impact on the accuracy of XGas retrieval. In this study, a 0.82% increase in the MEA value led to increases of 0.17% in XCO2, 0.09% in XCH4, 0.13% in XCH4_S5P, and 0.14% in XCO concentrations. Furthermore, seasonal variations were observed in the mFTIR measurements for XCO2, XCH4, and XCO. The highest XCO2 value recorded was 427.82 ± 0.56 ppmv in April 2024, while the lowest monthly average of 415.23 ± 0.58 ppmv was observed in September 2023. The highest XCH4 concentration was recorded in September 2024 at 1.966 ± 0.021 ppmv, while the lowest occurred in March 2024, with a value of 1.917 ± 0.016 ppmv. The highest XCO concentration was observed in spring, reaching 0.114 ± 0.014 ppmv in March 2024, while the lowest was recorded in fall at 0.102 ± 0.011 ppmv in September 2024. Additionally, the mFTIR measurements were compared to those obtained from HR-FTIR to evaluate the compatibility between the COCCON and TCCON measurement methods. Results indicated a strong correlation between the two measurement techniques, with instrument-specific calibration factors ranging from 0.9884 for XCO to 1.0017 for XH2O. These results demonstrate that the mFTIR is ready for use in measurements at the COCCON site and for measurement campaigns in South Korea.

在韩国一个新的温室气体监测站点,仪器线形校正及与TCCON测量的比较
为了有效地监测温室气体,韩国建立了一个新的合作碳柱观测网络(COCCON)站点。本研究的重点是通过精确测量仪器线形(ILS)参数并与TCCON测量结果进行比较,对COCCON观测仪器进行校准。COCCON网络采用Bruker的EM27/SUN移动傅里叶变换红外光谱仪(mFTIR),需要对高分辨率(HR-FTIR)仪器的数据进行验证。为了实现这一目标,我们将mFTIR数据与Bruker的IFS 125HR HR-FTIR数据进行了比较,以得出仪器特定的校准因子。利用开放路径(OP)法和C2H2充气电池(GFC)光谱分析了水蒸气光谱,得到了两个ILS值。ILS测量结果显示,GFC和OP方法的调制效率振幅(MEA)差异为0.712%,分别为(0.982±0.005)和(0.975±0.008)。值得注意的是,比较两组ILS参数得出的XGas值显示出高度的一致性,斜率接近1,这表明ILS参数的选择对XGas检索的准确性影响最小。在本研究中,MEA值每增加0.82%,XCO2浓度增加0.17%,XCH4浓度增加0.09%,XCH4_S5P浓度增加0.13%,XCO浓度增加0.14%。此外,XCO2、XCH4和XCO的mFTIR测量值也存在季节变化。年4月XCO2值最高,为427.82±0.56 ppmv,年9月最低,为415.23±0.58 ppmv。XCH4浓度最高的是2024年9月,为1.966±0.021 ppmv,最低的是2024年3月,为1.917±0.016 ppmv。春季XCO浓度最高,2024年3月达到0.114±0.014 ppmv,秋季最低,2024年9月为0.102±0.011 ppmv。此外,将mFTIR测量结果与HR-FTIR测量结果进行比较,以评估COCCON和TCCON测量方法之间的兼容性。结果表明,两种测量技术之间存在较强的相关性,XCO的特定仪器校准因子范围为0.9884 ~ 1.0017。这些结果表明,mFTIR已经准备好用于COCCON现场的测量和韩国的测量活动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Asia-Pacific Journal of Atmospheric Sciences
Asia-Pacific Journal of Atmospheric Sciences 地学-气象与大气科学
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
34
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Asia-Pacific Journal of Atmospheric Sciences (APJAS) is an international journal of the Korean Meteorological Society (KMS), published fully in English. It has started from 2008 by succeeding the KMS'' former journal, the Journal of the Korean Meteorological Society (JKMS), which published a total of 47 volumes as of 2011, in its time-honored tradition since 1965. Since 2008, the APJAS is included in the journal list of Thomson Reuters’ SCIE (Science Citation Index Expanded) and also in SCOPUS, the Elsevier Bibliographic Database, indicating the increased awareness and quality of the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信