From shore to land: a comparative isotopic study of Neolithic dietary practices in coastal and inland Croatia

IF 2.1 2区 地球科学 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY
Valentina Martinoia, Mario Novak, Ivor Janković, Dinko Tresić Pavičić, Maja Krznarić Škrivanko, Darko Komšo, Dženi Los, Goran Tomac, Dragana Rajković, Siniša Radović, Michael Richards
{"title":"From shore to land: a comparative isotopic study of Neolithic dietary practices in coastal and inland Croatia","authors":"Valentina Martinoia,&nbsp;Mario Novak,&nbsp;Ivor Janković,&nbsp;Dinko Tresić Pavičić,&nbsp;Maja Krznarić Škrivanko,&nbsp;Darko Komšo,&nbsp;Dženi Los,&nbsp;Goran Tomac,&nbsp;Dragana Rajković,&nbsp;Siniša Radović,&nbsp;Michael Richards","doi":"10.1007/s12520-025-02219-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The territory of present-day Croatia, spanning the Western Balkans and Adriatic Sea, was a key corridor for the Neolithic spread into Europe via two main routes: a maritime path along the Adriatic coast and a continental route through the Central Balkans and Pannonian Plain. Adaptation to local climatic and cultural conditions reinforced distinct inland and coastal cultural traditions. However, to date few studies have systematically examined the dietary practices of Neolithic populations in both inland and coastal areas, leaving questions about continuity or divergence in resource use unresolved. This study offers one of the most extensive isotopic analyses of the Neolithic period in the territory of present-day Croatia, examining 78 human (adult and subadult) and 46 faunal remains from eight Early, Middle, and Middle/Late Neolithic sites in coastal (Istria) and inland (Osijek-Baranja and Vukovar-Syrmia counties) regions. Using δ<sup>13</sup>C, δ<sup>15</sup>N, and δ<sup>34</sup>S isotope analyses, our findings reveal no significant differences in human subsistence strategies over time or between coastal and inland sites. Diets were primarily based on C<sub>3</sub> plants and terrestrial animals. Notably, most ovicaprids from our sample exhibit higher δ<sup>15</sup>N values than other herbivores from the sample, possibly reflecting distinct feeding or husbandry practices. This study enhances understanding of Neolithic dietary patterns in Croatia, shedding light on how agricultural practices were adopted and adapted in this region and contributing to broader discussions on the spread of the Neolithic across Southeastern Europe.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8214,"journal":{"name":"Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences","volume":"17 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12520-025-02219-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The territory of present-day Croatia, spanning the Western Balkans and Adriatic Sea, was a key corridor for the Neolithic spread into Europe via two main routes: a maritime path along the Adriatic coast and a continental route through the Central Balkans and Pannonian Plain. Adaptation to local climatic and cultural conditions reinforced distinct inland and coastal cultural traditions. However, to date few studies have systematically examined the dietary practices of Neolithic populations in both inland and coastal areas, leaving questions about continuity or divergence in resource use unresolved. This study offers one of the most extensive isotopic analyses of the Neolithic period in the territory of present-day Croatia, examining 78 human (adult and subadult) and 46 faunal remains from eight Early, Middle, and Middle/Late Neolithic sites in coastal (Istria) and inland (Osijek-Baranja and Vukovar-Syrmia counties) regions. Using δ13C, δ15N, and δ34S isotope analyses, our findings reveal no significant differences in human subsistence strategies over time or between coastal and inland sites. Diets were primarily based on C3 plants and terrestrial animals. Notably, most ovicaprids from our sample exhibit higher δ15N values than other herbivores from the sample, possibly reflecting distinct feeding or husbandry practices. This study enhances understanding of Neolithic dietary patterns in Croatia, shedding light on how agricultural practices were adopted and adapted in this region and contributing to broader discussions on the spread of the Neolithic across Southeastern Europe.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences
Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
18.20%
发文量
199
期刊介绍: Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences covers the full spectrum of natural scientific methods with an emphasis on the archaeological contexts and the questions being studied. It bridges the gap between archaeologists and natural scientists providing a forum to encourage the continued integration of scientific methodologies in archaeological research. Coverage in the journal includes: archaeology, geology/geophysical prospection, geoarchaeology, geochronology, palaeoanthropology, archaeozoology and archaeobotany, genetics and other biomolecules, material analysis and conservation science. The journal is endorsed by the German Society of Natural Scientific Archaeology and Archaeometry (GNAA), the Hellenic Society for Archaeometry (HSC), the Association of Italian Archaeometrists (AIAr) and the Society of Archaeological Sciences (SAS).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信