{"title":"Evaluating the hypothesis of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) presence in HDPE geomembranes","authors":"Xinyan Xiang, Abdelmalek Bouazza, Elissar Mikhael","doi":"10.1016/j.hazadv.2025.100723","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study examines the presence of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in high-density polyethylene (HDPE) geomembranes, which are commonly utilised in waste containment facilities, hydraulic infrastructure and other engineering applications. Three different HDPE geomembranes (GMBs) were analysed for PFAS content using targeted detection of six specific analytes and total fluorine (TF) measurements. To assess PFAS leachability under different conditions, extraction experiments were conducted using solutions with varying methanol concentrations. The results showed that perfluoropropionic acid (PFPrA), an ultra-short-chain PFAS, was detected in all tested geomembranes at concentrations ranging from below the limit of quantification (LOQ) to 0.44 µg/g. Importantly, PFPrA concentrations in two geomembranes (GMB2 and GMB3) manufactured at the same facility were comparable, whereas GMB1, produced at a different plant, exhibited concentrations nearly an order of magnitude higher. This disparity suggests potential differences in polymer processing aid (PPA) formulations, PFAS-containing additives, or variations in manufacturing processes. TF measurements for all samples fell below the reporting limit, indicating that large quantities of other PFAS were unlikely to be present. However, the high limit of quantification (LOQ) of 5 mg/kg for TF analysis likely resulted in excessive data censoring, highlighting the need for more sensitive TF detection methods. As regulatory pressures drive a transition toward PFAS-free polymer processing aids, a significant issue may arise if unregulated or unknown PFAS substitutes are used in place of regulated or guideline-referenced PFAS chemicals. Future research should investigate a broader range of geomembrane types and PFAS analytes, enabling more generalised conclusions to be drawn regarding the presence of PFAS in geomembranes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73763,"journal":{"name":"Journal of hazardous materials advances","volume":"18 ","pages":"Article 100723"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of hazardous materials advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772416625001354","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study examines the presence of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in high-density polyethylene (HDPE) geomembranes, which are commonly utilised in waste containment facilities, hydraulic infrastructure and other engineering applications. Three different HDPE geomembranes (GMBs) were analysed for PFAS content using targeted detection of six specific analytes and total fluorine (TF) measurements. To assess PFAS leachability under different conditions, extraction experiments were conducted using solutions with varying methanol concentrations. The results showed that perfluoropropionic acid (PFPrA), an ultra-short-chain PFAS, was detected in all tested geomembranes at concentrations ranging from below the limit of quantification (LOQ) to 0.44 µg/g. Importantly, PFPrA concentrations in two geomembranes (GMB2 and GMB3) manufactured at the same facility were comparable, whereas GMB1, produced at a different plant, exhibited concentrations nearly an order of magnitude higher. This disparity suggests potential differences in polymer processing aid (PPA) formulations, PFAS-containing additives, or variations in manufacturing processes. TF measurements for all samples fell below the reporting limit, indicating that large quantities of other PFAS were unlikely to be present. However, the high limit of quantification (LOQ) of 5 mg/kg for TF analysis likely resulted in excessive data censoring, highlighting the need for more sensitive TF detection methods. As regulatory pressures drive a transition toward PFAS-free polymer processing aids, a significant issue may arise if unregulated or unknown PFAS substitutes are used in place of regulated or guideline-referenced PFAS chemicals. Future research should investigate a broader range of geomembrane types and PFAS analytes, enabling more generalised conclusions to be drawn regarding the presence of PFAS in geomembranes.